Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RGACX vs STNFX
RGACX vs STNFX Comparison
Open Charts RGACX vs STNFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst
Price$50.53
Change-$0.09 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.03B
RGACX vs STNFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RGACX vs. STNFX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RGACX is a Buy and STNFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. STNFX (1.03B). RGACX pays higher dividends than STNFX: RGACX (0.07) vs STNFX (0.00). RGACX was incepted earlier than STNFX: RGACX (23 years) vs STNFX (15 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than STNFX (0.86). STNFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than STNFX: RGACX (250) vs STNFX (1000000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. STNFX (10.71). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. STNFX (-6.89).
| RGACX | STNFX | RGACX / STNFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.70 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.86 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.516 | 15.050 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 1.03B | 32,233% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.83 | 10.71 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.53 | 34.75 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.02 | -6.89 | -581% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.93 | 6.64 | 1,446% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement