RH
Price
$173.39
Change
+$2.34 (+1.37%)
Updated
Aug 19, 12:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.24B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TLF
Price
$2.60
Change
+$0.04 (+1.56%)
Updated
Aug 19, 11:55 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.01M
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RH vs TLF

RH vs TLF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RH vs. TLF commentary
Aug 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RH is a Hold and TLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2026
Stock price -- (RH: $171.05 vs. TLF: $2.56)
Brand notoriety: RH: Notable vs. TLF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RH: 61% vs. TLF: 42%
Market capitalization -- RH: $3.24B vs. TLF: $21.01M
RH [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $3.24B. TLF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $21.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $52.32B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $4.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the long-term than RH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TLF is a better buy in the short-term than RH.

Price Growth

RH (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.45% price change this week, while TLF (@Specialty Stores) price change was +4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

RH is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

TLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.31% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RH($3.24B) has a higher market cap than TLF($21M). RH has higher P/E ratio than TLF: RH (33.02) vs TLF (2.18). TLF YTD gains are higher at: 61.793 vs. RH (-4.521). RH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 520M vs. TLF (5.69M). RH has more cash in the bank: 53.8M vs. TLF (10.1M). TLF has less debt than RH: TLF (27.7M) vs RH (4.02B). RH has higher revenues than TLF: RH (3.43B) vs TLF (76.9M).
RHTLFRH / TLF
Capitalization3.24B21M15,414%
EBITDA520M5.69M9,142%
Gain YTD-4.52161.793-7%
P/E Ratio33.022.181,513%
Revenue3.43B76.9M4,455%
Total Cash53.8M10.1M533%
Total Debt4.02B27.7M14,509%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RH vs TLF: Fundamental Ratings
RH
TLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5743
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10069
SMR RATING
1..100
3492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TLF's Valuation (27) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (85) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's SMR Rating (34) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLF (92) in the null industry. This means that RH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as RH (53) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that TLF’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.

RH's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as TLF (100) in the null industry. This means that RH’s stock grew similarly to TLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RHTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TLF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLI64.281.86
+2.98%
RLI Corp
BMR1.29N/A
N/A
Beamr Imaging Ltd
MCGA10.29-0.01
-0.05%
Yorkville Acquisition Corp.
OMER17.19-0.17
-0.98%
Omeros Corp
BCS27.37-0.43
-1.55%
Barclays PLC

RH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RH
1D Price
Change %
RH100%
-2.76%
FND - RH
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
WSM - RH
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CPRT - RH
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
ARHS - RH
59%
Loosely correlated
+5.25%
HVT - RH
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More

TLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TLF has been loosely correlated with HTLM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TLF jumps, then HTLM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLF
1D Price
Change %
TLF100%
-1.54%
HTLM - TLF
46%
Loosely correlated
+4.30%
RH - TLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.76%
SVV - TLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
ONEW - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
ARKO - TLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.88%
More