Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs UBVVX
RSQCX vs UBVVX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs UBVVX
RSQCX vs UBVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. UBVVX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Hold and UBVVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVVX has more cash in the bank: 8.48B vs. RSQCX (485M). UBVVX pays higher dividends than RSQCX: UBVVX (1.59) vs RSQCX (1.23). RSQCX was incepted earlier than UBVVX: RSQCX (23 years) vs UBVVX (10 years). RSQCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than UBVVX (0.94). UBVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RSQCX (12.00). UBVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: UBVVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). RSQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.30 vs. UBVVX (-0.18). UBVVX return over 5 years is better than : 15.59 vs. RSQCX (-12.23).
| RSQCX | UBVVX | RSQCX / UBVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.90 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 0.94 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.429 | 10.400 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 485M | 8.48B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 1.59 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.30 | -0.18 | -7,386% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.86 | 17.88 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.23 | 15.59 | -78% |
| Returns for 10 years | -10.27 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement