Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RSQCX vs UBVVX
RSQCX vs UBVVX Comparison
Open Charts RSQCX vs UBVVX
RSQCX vs UBVVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RSQCX vs. UBVVX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RSQCX is a Buy and UBVVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVVX has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. RSQCX (495M). UBVVX pays higher dividends than RSQCX: UBVVX (1.59) vs RSQCX (1.24). RSQCX was incepted earlier than UBVVX: RSQCX (23 years) vs UBVVX (9 years). RSQCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than UBVVX (0.94). UBVVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RSQCX (12.00). UBVVX has a lower initial minimum investment than RSQCX: UBVVX (0) vs RSQCX (2000). RSQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. UBVVX (9.60). UBVVX return over 5 years is better than : 18.82 vs. RSQCX (-11.07).
| RSQCX | UBVVX | RSQCX / UBVVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.24 | 0.90 | 249% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.45 | 0.94 | 261% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.005 | 14.187 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 495M | 9.02B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.24 | 1.59 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.95 | 9.60 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.25 | 14.27 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.07 | 18.82 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.14 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement