Advertisement
RUN vs ZEO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RUN is a StrongBuy and ZEO is a Hold.
| RUN | ZEO | RUN / ZEO | |
| Capitalization | 2.06B | 9.63M | 21,403% |
| EBITDA | 882M | -9.11M | -9,680% |
| Gain YTD | -53.478 | -78.202 | 68% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.82 | 2.25 | 258% |
| Revenue | 3.48B | 71.8M | 4,841% |
| Total Cash | 712M | 2.45M | 29,038% |
| Total Debt | 15.2B | 1.54M | 986,372% |
RUN | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RUN | ZEO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 53% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RUN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while ZEO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RUN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZEO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RUN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZEO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RUN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- ZEO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
RUN (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -3.71% price change this week, while ZEO (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -2.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
RUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-0.80% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AIBU | 66.40 | 2.02 | +3.13% |
| Direxion Daily AI And Big Data Bull 2X | |||
| FDIS | 98.75 | 1.09 | +1.11% |
| Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discret ETF | |||
| KRYP | 22.07 | 0.23 | +1.05% |
| Proshares Coindesk 20 Crypto ETF | |||
| FCOR | 45.64 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| MGOV | 19.61 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
| First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
ZEO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ZEO and ENPH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ZEO and ENPH's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZEO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZEO | 100% | -2.94% | ||
| ENPH - ZEO | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.38% | ||
| RUN - ZEO | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.81% | ||
| SEDG - ZEO | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.63% | ||
| NXT - ZEO | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| SHLS - ZEO | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||