SAFT
Price
$70.62
Change
-$1.18 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.22B
5 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$26.90
Change
-$0.92 (-3.31%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
550.29M
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SAFT vs UFCS

Header iconSAFT vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts SAFT vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Safety Insurance Group
Price$70.62
Change-$1.18 (-1.64%)
Volume$55.64K
Capitalization1.22B
United Fire Group
Price$26.90
Change-$0.92 (-3.31%)
Volume$126.65K
Capitalization550.29M
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAFT vs. UFCS commentary
Jul 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAFT is a StrongBuy and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2025
Stock price -- (SAFT: $70.62 vs. UFCS: $26.90)
Brand notoriety: SAFT and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAFT: 73% vs. UFCS: 108%
Market capitalization -- SAFT: $1.22B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
SAFT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.22B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAFT is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.02% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.11% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.22B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: SAFT (63.23) vs UFCS (41.53). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: -4.372 vs. SAFT (-12.310). SAFT has more cash in the bank: 518M vs. UFCS (102M). SAFT (49.8M) and UFCS (50M) have identical debt. UFCS has higher revenues than SAFT: UFCS (1.1B) vs SAFT (926M).
SAFTUFCSSAFT / UFCS
Capitalization1.22B550M221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.310-4.372282%
P/E Ratio63.2341.53152%
Revenue926M1.1B84%
Total Cash518M102M508%
Total Debt49.8M50M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAFT vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
SAFT
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6779
SMR RATING
1..100
7579
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9175
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (40). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (79). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (79). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (81). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (91). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAFTUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIDAX8.33N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem A
BMPIX113.81N/A
N/A
ProFunds Materials UltraSector Inv
FERGX16.24N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Emerging Markets Index
FGIAX12.89N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Infrastructure A
WFINX57.83N/A
N/A
Allspring Index C

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been closely correlated with CNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then CNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
-1.64%
CNA - SAFT
69%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
HMN - SAFT
68%
Closely correlated
-0.70%
UFCS - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
L - SAFT
67%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
CINF - SAFT
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-3.31%
SAFT - UFCS
66%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
CINF - UFCS
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
L - UFCS
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
AFG - UFCS
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
THG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.22%
More