SAFT
Price
$82.12
Change
+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
72 days until earnings call
UFCS
Price
$28.96
Change
-$0.53 (-1.80%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SAFT vs UFCS

Header iconSAFT vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts SAFT vs UFCSBanner chart's image
Safety Insurance Group
Price$82.12
Change+$0.02 (+0.02%)
Volume$2.55K
CapitalizationN/A
United Fire Group
Price$28.96
Change-$0.53 (-1.80%)
Volume$6.28K
CapitalizationN/A
SAFT vs UFCS Comparison Chart
Loading...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SAFT vs. UFCS commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SAFT is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (SAFT: $82.12 vs. UFCS: $28.95)
Brand notoriety: SAFT and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SAFT: 321% vs. UFCS: 356%
Market capitalization -- SAFT: $1.22B vs. UFCS: $550.29M
SAFT [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.22B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $550.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SAFT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SAFT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than SAFT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SAFT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SAFT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the short-term than SAFT.

Price Growth

SAFT (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.90% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -6.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

SAFT is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.49% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAFT($1.22B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($550M). SAFT has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: SAFT (63.23) vs UFCS (41.53). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 47.870 vs. SAFT (12.868). SAFT has more cash in the bank: 518M vs. UFCS (102M). SAFT (49.8M) and UFCS (50M) have identical debt. UFCS has higher revenues than SAFT: UFCS (1.1B) vs SAFT (926M).
SAFTUFCSSAFT / UFCS
Capitalization1.22B550M221%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.86847.87027%
P/E Ratio63.2341.53152%
Revenue926M1.1B84%
Total Cash518M102M508%
Total Debt49.8M50M100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SAFT vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
SAFT
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82100
SMR RATING
1..100
7381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9738
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5018

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAFT's Valuation (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (42). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (100). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

SAFT's SMR Rating (73) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (81). This means that SAFT’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SAFT (49). This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAFT (97). This means that UFCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAFT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SAFTUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SAFT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UFCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HCMDX28.140.44
+1.59%
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
WFEIX59.530.73
+1.24%
Allspring Mid Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
FSEKX13.260.14
+1.03%
Fidelity Advisor Sustainable U.S. Eq A
NIEYX14.090.01
+0.07%
BNY Mellon International Equity Y
TEDSX27.90-2.18
-7.26%
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C

SAFT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAFT has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAFT jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAFT
1D Price
Change %
SAFT100%
+0.02%
L - SAFT
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
UFCS - SAFT
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
THG - SAFT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
AFG - SAFT
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
AXS - SAFT
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
-1.83%
SAFT - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
L - UFCS
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
CINF - UFCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
AFG - UFCS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
RLI - UFCS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
More