SCHV vs VYM

Key Takeaways

• Different strategies, overlapping goals: SCHV is a broad large-cap value fund, while VYM is an income-oriented fund that screens for above-average dividend yield.
• Identical ultra-low cost: Both now carry a 0.04% expense ratio, removing fees as a differentiator in this ETF comparison.
• Diversification differs: SCHV's largest position is roughly 3% of assets, whereas VYM holds about 7–8% in a single name, AVGO, adding concentration risk.
• Income and scale favor VYM: VYM yields around 2.3% and manages roughly $79 billion in ETF assets, versus a lower yield and roughly $15 billion for SCHV.
• Similar sector tilts: Both lean heavily on financials, technology, healthcare, and energy, so relative positioning depends more on dividend and valuation dynamics.
• Tickeron AI Verdict: VYM is the favored ticker, reflecting comparable cost, deeper liquidity, and stronger income characteristics.

Introduction

SCHV and VYM are frequently compared because they occupy adjacent territory within the large-cap value and dividend-income segments of the U.S. equity market. They are not identical products: SCHV pursues a pure value style tilt, while VYM targets stocks with above-average dividend yields. Yet both appeal to investors seeking defensive, cash-generating exposure away from high-multiple growth names. With Vanguard's recent fee reduction bringing VYM to the same 0.04% expense ratio as SCHV, the two funds are more evenly matched than ever, making a structural and relative positioning comparison especially timely.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV) Overview

SCHV is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. It holds roughly 559 stocks selected for value characteristics such as lower price-to-book and price-to-earnings ratios, weighted by market capitalization. The fund, launched in December 2009, charges a 0.04% expense ratio.

Top holdings include BRK.B, JPM, MU, XOM, JNJ, WMT, ABBV, and CSCO, with no single position exceeding roughly 3% of assets. Sector exposure is led by financials (about 19%), followed by information technology, industrials, healthcare, consumer staples, energy, and utilities. Because SCHV does not apply a dividend screen, it retains a broader value universe, including some real estate investment trusts (REITs) and lower-yielding value names.

Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) Overview

VYM is a passively managed, full-replication ETF that seeks to track the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. The index selects U.S. companies forecast to pay above-average dividends, excludes REITs, and applies buffer zones during annual rebalancing to limit turnover. VYM was launched in November 2006 and currently charges a 0.04% expense ratio.

The fund holds roughly 605 stocks and yields about 2.3%. Its top holdings are AVGO (approximately 7–8% of assets), JPM, XOM, JNJ, ABBV, CSCO, CVX, and CAT. Sector allocation is dominated by financial services (about 21%), with meaningful weight in technology, healthcare, industrials, and energy. The fund's scale—around $79 billion in ETF assets—supports tight spreads and robust liquidity.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs are heavily influenced by the same macro forces: a higher-for-longer interest-rate environment that favors financials and dividend-paying energy producers, persistent demand for income amid equity-market concentration in growth names, and a cyclical rotation toward value-oriented sectors. Banks and energy companies, which feature prominently in both funds, benefit from elevated net interest margins and steady cash generation. Conversely, both funds carry exposure to rate-sensitive utilities and economically cyclical industrials, meaning their performance is sensitive to shifts in rate expectations and the economic cycle. Income-oriented capital flows remain a structural tailwind for dividend strategies, while the value tilt keeps both funds exposed to earnings-cycle risks in their largest holdings.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VYM and SCHV have moved largely in tandem, reflecting overlapping sector exposure and similar valuation profiles. VYM's heavier energy allocation and its large semiconductor position in AVGO have periodically amplified both upside and downside, while SCHV's more balanced construction—including REITs and a lower single-stock concentration—has produced somewhat steadier relative positioning. VYM's higher dividend yield has supported resilient income flows, whereas SCHV's pure value methodology has captured a broader swath of cheap large-caps. Volatility differences remain modest, with VYM exhibiting slightly lower beta (a measure of sensitivity to the broad market) and a marginally higher top-10 concentration. Neither fund is structurally advantaged on cost, so relative performance has hinged on sector rotation, dividend demand, and the earnings cycles of shared holdings such as JPM and XOM.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to bring data-driven precision to your own ETF comparison workflow.

Tickeron AI Verdict

On balance, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VYM. The rationale rests on observable structural factors rather than a single data point: VYM matches SCHV's 0.04% cost while offering a meaningfully higher dividend yield and a far larger asset base, which supports deeper liquidity and tighter trading spreads. Its sector mix—led by financials and energy—aligns well with the current income-oriented, rate-sensitive environment, and its trend consistency has been supported by persistent capital flows into dividend strategies. The principal caveat is VYM's elevated single-stock concentration in AVGO, which introduces idiosyncratic risk absent in the more diversified SCHV. Probabilistically, however, VYM's combination of cost efficiency, income, scale, and sector momentum gives it the edge in this matchup.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations