SEAT
Price
$4.68
Change
-$0.27 (-5.45%)
Updated
Sep 14 closing price
Capitalization
52.83M
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZG
Price
$33.83
Change
+$0.60 (+1.81%)
Updated
Sep 14 closing price
Capitalization
7.49B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SEAT vs ZG

SEAT vs ZG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SEAT vs. ZG commentary
Sep 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SEAT is a Buy and ZG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZG($7.49B) has a higher market cap than SEAT($52.8M). ZG has higher P/E ratio than SEAT: ZG (147.04) vs SEAT (46.50). SEAT YTD gains are higher at: -35.090 vs. ZG (-50.418). ZG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 348M vs. SEAT (-411.55M). ZG has more cash in the bank: 682M vs. SEAT (137M). SEAT has less debt than ZG: SEAT (401M) vs ZG (558M). ZG has higher revenues than SEAT: ZG (2.81B) vs SEAT (519M).
SEATZGSEAT / ZG
Capitalization52.8M7.49B1%
EBITDA-411.55M348M-118%
Gain YTD-35.090-50.41870%
P/E Ratio46.50147.0432%
Revenue519M2.81B18%
Total Cash137M682M20%
Total Debt401M558M72%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZG: Fundamental Ratings
ZG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SEATZG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 15, 2026
Stock price -- (SEAT: $4.68 vs. ZG: $33.83)
Brand notoriety: SEAT and ZG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SEAT: 168% vs. ZG: 90%
Market capitalization -- SEAT: $52.83M vs. ZG: $7.49B
SEAT [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $52.83M. ZG’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $7.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $2.69K to $4.25T. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $146.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SEAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while ZG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SEAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ZG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEAT is a better buy in the long-term than ZG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SEAT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SEAT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • ZG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ZG is a better buy in the short-term than SEAT.

Price Growth

SEAT (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -22.52% price change this week, while ZG (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -4.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -1.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

ZG is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (-1.80% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

View a ticker or compare two or three
SEAT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHSCX46.83N/A
N/A
BlackRock Health Sciences Opps Inv C
PGILX43.25N/A
N/A
Putnam Focused Equity Y
RYWVX97.71N/A
N/A
Rydex Emerging Markets 2X Strategy H
PKAIX18.71N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US Instl
FSSEX15.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI Sustainable Intl Eq

SEAT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEAT has been loosely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SEAT jumps, then Z could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEAT
1D Price
Change %
SEAT100%
-5.45%
Z - SEAT
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
ZG - SEAT
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
TEAD - SEAT
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPLI - SEAT
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.89%
CARS - SEAT
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
More

ZG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZG has been closely correlated with Z. These tickers have moved in lockstep 99% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZG jumps, then Z could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZG
1D Price
Change %
ZG100%
+1.81%
Z - ZG
99%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
NRDS - ZG
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
CARG - ZG
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
MTCH - ZG
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
PPLI - ZG
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.89%
More