SG
Price
$7.37
Change
-$0.33 (-4.29%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.01B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WING
Price
$144.49
Change
+$0.44 (+0.31%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.93B
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SG vs WING

Header iconSG vs WING Comparison
Open Charts SG vs WINGBanner chart's image
SG vs WING Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SG vs. WING commentary
Jun 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SG is a Hold and WING is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2026
Stock price -- (SG: $7.69 vs. WING: $144.18)
Brand notoriety: SG and WING are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SG: 143% vs. WING: 75%
Market capitalization -- SG: $1.01B vs. WING: $3.93B
SG [@Restaurants] is valued at $1.01B. WING’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $3.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $194.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $9.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWING’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WING’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SG is a better buy in the long-term than WING.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WING’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WING’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WING is a better buy in the short-term than SG.

Price Growth

SG (@Restaurants) experienced а -23.86% price change this week, while WING (@Restaurants) price change was -5.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -4.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

SG is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

WING is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-4.78% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WING($3.93B) has a higher market cap than SG($1.01B). SG has higher P/E ratio than WING: SG (64.08) vs WING (35.60). SG YTD gains are higher at: 13.757 vs. WING (-39.315). WING has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 217M vs. SG (92.6M). SG has less debt than WING: SG (356M) vs WING (1.27B). WING (709M) and SG (675M) have equivalent revenues.
SGWINGSG / WING
Capitalization1.01B3.93B26%
EBITDA92.6M217M43%
Gain YTD13.757-39.315-35%
P/E Ratio64.0835.60180%
Revenue675M709M95%
Total Cash157MN/A-
Total Debt356M1.27B28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SG vs WING: Fundamental Ratings
SG
WING
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
837
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
88100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4185
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WING's Valuation (69) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (96) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WING’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

WING's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as SG (100) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that WING’s stock grew similarly to SG’s over the last 12 months.

SG's SMR Rating (88) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as WING (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew similarly to WING’s over the last 12 months.

SG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WING (85) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WING’s over the last 12 months.

SG's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WING (86) in the Restaurants industry. This means that SG’s stock grew somewhat faster than WING’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SGWING
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QMID29.070.02
+0.08%
WisdomTree U.S. Mid Cap Quality Gr
VCRB76.86-0.14
-0.18%
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
WIP40.05-0.29
-0.72%
StateStreet®SPDR®FTSEIntGovInfProtdBdETF
AOTG65.33-0.89
-1.35%
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF
BLOX17.50-0.46
-2.56%
Nicholas Crypto Income ETF

SG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SG has been loosely correlated with CMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SG jumps, then CMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SG
1D Price
Change %
SG100%
-9.32%
CMG - SG
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.78%
CAVA - SG
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
FRSH - SG
48%
Loosely correlated
-6.00%
KRUS - SG
45%
Loosely correlated
-5.30%
BROS - SG
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
More