Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) provide complementary yet distinct routes to silver-mining equities. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer investors alternative risk-return profiles within the same underlying sector. SIL emphasizes larger, more established operators, while SILJ targets smaller companies with greater operational leverage to silver prices. Comparing the two helps investors align their silver-sector allocation with specific objectives around cost, diversification, and volatility tolerance in the current environment of rising industrial silver demand.
Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) seeks to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 40 securities and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS), and Coeur Mining Inc (CDE), which together can represent a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation concentrates overwhelmingly in basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. SIL provides exposure across global silver miners, including producers and streaming/royalty firms, offering a relatively diversified approach within the silver-mining theme.
Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) seeks to track the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. The fund holds approximately 65–68 securities and follows a passive indexing approach with quarterly rebalancing and semi-annual reconstitution. Top holdings commonly feature Hecla Mining Company (HL), First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), and SSR Mining Inc (SSRM). Sector allocation remains concentrated in basic materials, with a clear emphasis on smaller-capitalization issuers. The expense ratio is 0.69%. SILJ delivers targeted exposure to junior silver miners and exploration-stage companies, resulting in a higher-beta profile relative to larger producers.
The silver-mining sector benefits from dual demand drivers: traditional investment and industrial applications such as solar panels, electronics, and electric vehicles. Macroeconomic factors including interest-rate expectations, inflation trends, and global economic growth influence capital flows into precious-metals equities. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with geopolitical supply risks in key producing regions, can affect sector performance. Both ETFs remain sensitive to silver-price movements and broader commodity cycles, though their differing market-capitalization biases create distinct responses to these catalysts.
Over recent market cycles, Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has tended to deliver more moderate returns with lower volatility, reflecting its allocation to larger, cash-flow-stable producers. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has shown greater sensitivity to silver-price rallies and sector rotations, delivering amplified gains during favorable periods but also sharper drawdowns when sentiment turns. Relative positioning hinges on investor preference for established operators versus junior leverage. SIL’s lower expense ratio and broader holdings may support more consistent long-term compounding, while SILJ’s junior focus can enhance upside capture during strong silver bull markets.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking silver-sector exposure can leverage the tool to refine comparisons between funds like Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).
Based on structural characteristics including a modestly lower expense ratio, greater allocation to established producers, and a slightly broader holdings profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and relative stability within the silver-mining theme. SILJ may appeal to those seeking higher-beta exposure to junior miners, but the observable factors of cost and diversification tilt the probabilistic assessment toward SIL in the present market environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| SIL | SILJ | SIL / SILJ | |
| Gain YTD | 18.866 | 14.601 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 5.34B | 4.19B | 127% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.69 | 94% |
| Turnover | 27.57 | 47.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 1.38 | 2.30 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| SIL | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RCLR | 51.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF | |||
| QNXT | 32.03 | -0.41 | -1.25% |
| iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | |||
| FVC | 42.25 | -0.74 | -1.72% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5 | |||
| AMDY | 42.15 | -0.86 | -2.00% |
| YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| ARKG | 47.64 | -2.23 | -4.47% |
| ARK Genomic Revolution ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SIL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIL | 100% | -3.88% | ||
| PAAS - SIL | 95% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| WPM - SIL | 94% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| CDE - SIL | 91% Closely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| OR - SIL | 88% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| VZLA - SIL | 82% Closely correlated | -3.85% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | -4.37% | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 93% Closely correlated | -3.68% | ||
| CDE - SILJ | 91% Closely correlated | -4.86% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 91% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| SKE - SILJ | 88% Closely correlated | -5.35% | ||
| OR - SILJ | 87% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
More | ||||