SIL
Price
$99.14
Change
-$4.00 (-3.88%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
5.34B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SILJ
Price
$31.71
Change
-$1.45 (-4.37%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Net Assets
4.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SIL vs SILJ

SIL vs SILJ Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) vs. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ)

Key Takeaways

  • Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) targets a broader mix of established silver producers and royalty/streaming companies, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) focuses on smaller, higher-risk junior miners and explorers.
  • SIL maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.65% compared with SILJ’s 0.69%, providing a modest long-term cost advantage for buy-and-hold investors.
  • SIL typically holds around 40 securities with greater concentration in large-cap names, whereas SILJ holds approximately 65–68 holdings skewed toward mid- and small-cap issuers.
  • Both ETFs are passive vehicles tracking silver-mining indices and exhibit high sensitivity to silver prices, industrial demand, and macroeconomic factors such as interest rates and inflation expectations.
  • SILJ generally displays higher volatility due to its junior-miner tilt, while SIL offers relatively more stable exposure within the same thematic sector.
  • Neither fund serves as a core portfolio holding; both function best as satellite allocations for investors seeking targeted silver-sector exposure.

Introduction

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) provide complementary yet distinct routes to silver-mining equities. They do not compete directly as identical products; instead, they offer investors alternative risk-return profiles within the same underlying sector. SIL emphasizes larger, more established operators, while SILJ targets smaller companies with greater operational leverage to silver prices. Comparing the two helps investors align their silver-sector allocation with specific objectives around cost, diversification, and volatility tolerance in the current environment of rising industrial silver demand.

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) Overview

Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) seeks to track the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. The fund holds approximately 40 securities and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with periodic rebalancing. Top holdings typically include Wheaton Precious Metals Corp (WPM), Pan American Silver Corp (PAAS), and Coeur Mining Inc (CDE), which together can represent a significant portion of assets. Sector allocation concentrates overwhelmingly in basic materials. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. SIL provides exposure across global silver miners, including producers and streaming/royalty firms, offering a relatively diversified approach within the silver-mining theme.

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) Overview

Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) seeks to track the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. The fund holds approximately 65–68 securities and follows a passive indexing approach with quarterly rebalancing and semi-annual reconstitution. Top holdings commonly feature Hecla Mining Company (HL), First Majestic Silver Corp (AG), and SSR Mining Inc (SSRM). Sector allocation remains concentrated in basic materials, with a clear emphasis on smaller-capitalization issuers. The expense ratio is 0.69%. SILJ delivers targeted exposure to junior silver miners and exploration-stage companies, resulting in a higher-beta profile relative to larger producers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The silver-mining sector benefits from dual demand drivers: traditional investment and industrial applications such as solar panels, electronics, and electric vehicles. Macroeconomic factors including interest-rate expectations, inflation trends, and global economic growth influence capital flows into precious-metals equities. Regulatory developments around mining permits and environmental standards, along with geopolitical supply risks in key producing regions, can affect sector performance. Both ETFs remain sensitive to silver-price movements and broader commodity cycles, though their differing market-capitalization biases create distinct responses to these catalysts.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent market cycles, Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has tended to deliver more moderate returns with lower volatility, reflecting its allocation to larger, cash-flow-stable producers. Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has shown greater sensitivity to silver-price rallies and sector rotations, delivering amplified gains during favorable periods but also sharper drawdowns when sentiment turns. Relative positioning hinges on investor preference for established operators versus junior leverage. SIL’s lower expense ratio and broader holdings may support more consistent long-term compounding, while SILJ’s junior focus can enhance upside capture during strong silver bull markets.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking silver-sector exposure can leverage the tool to refine comparisons between funds like Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural characteristics including a modestly lower expense ratio, greater allocation to established producers, and a slightly broader holdings profile, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and relative stability within the silver-mining theme. SILJ may appeal to those seeking higher-beta exposure to junior miners, but the observable factors of cost and diversification tilt the probabilistic assessment toward SIL in the present market environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SIL vs. SILJ commentary
Aug 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SIL is a Hold and SILJ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SIL has more net assets: 5.34B vs. SILJ (4.19B). SIL has a higher annual dividend yield than SILJ: SIL (18.866) vs SILJ (14.601). SIL was incepted earlier than SILJ: SIL (16 years) vs SILJ (14 years). SIL (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than SILJ (0.69). SILJ has a higher turnover SIL (27.57) vs SIL (27.57).
SILSILJSIL / SILJ
Gain YTD18.86614.601129%
Net Assets5.34B4.19B127%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.6994%
Turnover27.5747.0059%
Yield1.382.3060%
Fund Existence16 years14 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SILSILJ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SIL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SILJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RCLR51.55N/A
N/A
Reckoner BBB-B Clo Reinvesting ETF
QNXT32.03-0.41
-1.25%
iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
FVC42.25-0.74
-1.72%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Dynamic Foc 5
AMDY42.15-0.86
-2.00%
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
ARKG47.64-2.23
-4.47%
ARK Genomic Revolution ETF

SIL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SIL has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 95% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SIL jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIL
1D Price
Change %
SIL100%
-3.88%
PAAS - SIL
95%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
WPM - SIL
94%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
CDE - SIL
91%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
OR - SIL
88%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
VZLA - SIL
82%
Closely correlated
-3.85%
More

SILJ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SILJ
1D Price
Change %
SILJ100%
-4.37%
PAAS - SILJ
93%
Closely correlated
-3.68%
CDE - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
-4.86%
WPM - SILJ
91%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
SKE - SILJ
88%
Closely correlated
-5.35%
OR - SILJ
87%
Closely correlated
-3.21%
More