SMH
Price
$436.88
Change
+$6.57 (+1.53%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
48.19B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$142.62
Change
+$0.55 (+0.39%)
Updated
Apr 10 closing price
Net Assets
90.77B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMH vs XLK

Header iconSMH vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs XLKBanner chart's image
SMH vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • SMH offers concentrated exposure to 25 semiconductor companies via the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, while XLK provides broader technology sector coverage with 71 holdings tracking the Technology Select Sector Index.
  • SMH's top 10 holdings represent over 70% of assets, led by NVDA (~18%), TSM (~11%), and AVGO, emphasizing high-purity semiconductor plays.
  • XLK features diversified tech allocations: semiconductors (~42%), software (~28%), hardware (~16%), with top holdings including NVDA (15%), AAPL (13%), and MSFT (10%).
  • Expense ratio advantage to XLK at 0.08% versus SMH's 0.35%, making XLK more cost-efficient for long-term holding.
  • SMH exhibits higher volatility due to sector concentration, suiting aggressive growth seekers; XLK offers lower risk through diversification across tech subsectors.
  • Both funds benefit from AI-driven demand, but SMH's pure semiconductor focus positions it for outsized gains in chip cycles.

Introduction

SMH and XLK represent compelling options for investors eyeing technology exposure amid the AI infrastructure boom. SMH delivers targeted access to the semiconductor subsector, critical for chips powering data centers and devices, while XLK captures the broader S&P 500 technology sector, blending semiconductors with software and hardware giants. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies: SMH for concentrated bets on semiconductor momentum, XLK for diversified tech stability. In recent market cycles, semiconductors have driven tech outperformance, drawing capital flows and highlighting structural differences in exposure profiles, risk, and cost structures.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive fund seeking to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, a modified market-cap-weighted benchmark tracking the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-exchange-listed semiconductor firms generating at least 50% of revenue from semiconductors or equipment. It holds approximately 25-26 stocks, with top 10 comprising ~75% of assets, including NVDA (17-19%), TSM (11%), AVGO (7%), MU (6%), and ASML (6%). Sector allocation is 100% technology, focused on semiconductors. The expense ratio is 0.35%, with quarterly rebalancing and a 20% single-stock cap for diversification. Launched in 2011, SMH emphasizes liquidity via minimum market cap ($150M+), trading volume, and share requirements, appealing to thematic investors pursuing chip innovation.

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) Overview

The State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) passively tracks the Technology Select Sector Index, representing the technology portion of the S&P 500 across hardware, software, semiconductors, IT services, and equipment. It holds 71 stocks, with top 10 at ~61%, led by NVDA (15%), AAPL (13%), MSFT (10%), AVGO (5%), and MU (4%). Sector breakdown: semiconductors/equipment (42%), software (28%), hardware (16%), communications (5%), others (9%). Expense ratio is a low 0.08%. Inception in 1998, XLK suits investors seeking broad tech representation with high liquidity (tight 0.01% bid-ask spreads) and precise S&P 500 sector mirroring.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector, particularly semiconductors, thrives amid surging AI infrastructure demand, with global chip sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026, up 26% year-over-year. Catalysts include hyperscaler capex exceeding $650 billion for AI data centers, fueling needs for GPUs, memory, and foundry capacity. Capital flows favor semiconductors, evidenced by strong ETF inflows into funds like SMH amid sector rotation. Macro drivers such as interest rate stabilization support growth stocks, while risks encompass supply chain geopolitics (e.g., U.S.-China tensions), potential AI demand moderation, and cyclical downturns in non-AI chips. Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and export controls adds caution, yet AI's secular tailwinds dominate the environment for both ETFs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, SMH has outperformed XLK, with YTD 2026 returns around 10-12% versus XLK's -3% territory, reflecting semiconductor resilience amid broader tech pullbacks. Over multi-year cycles, SMH's annualized returns exceed XLK's (e.g., 30%+ vs. 20% over 10 years), driven by AI chip leaders like NVDA. SMH's higher volatility (~9-10% monthly) stems from concentration, contrasting XLK's steadier profile (~6%), bolstered by software stalwarts. Performance ties to semiconductor earnings strength, AI capex cycles, and sector rotation from mega-cap tech to cyclicals. SMH leads in momentum phases; XLK provides relative stability during rotations.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases top-performing AI trading bots from its platform of hundreds covering thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. This curated section highlights the strongest bots under prevailing market conditions, featuring over 25 agents excelling in sectors like semiconductors, energy, aerospace, and small caps. Metrics include annualized returns up to +214%, win rates to 94%, and profit factors over 22, with strategies spanning trend-following, hedging, volatility plays, and timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Examples trade symbols like SMH, SOXL, and sector baskets. Explore these for potential copy trading insights tailored to current dynamics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH for its structural alignment with AI/semiconductor momentum, superior trend consistency, and exposure to high-growth chip leaders, despite higher costs and volatility. XLK's diversification and efficiency suit balanced portfolios, but SMH's ~10% YTD edge and sector tailwinds suggest 60-70% probability of near-term outperformance in AI-driven cycles. Observable factors prioritize SMH's purity over XLK's breadth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMH vs. XLK commentary
Apr 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a StrongBuy and XLK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 90.8B vs. SMH (48.2B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: SMH (21.312) vs XLK (-0.815). SMH was incepted earlier than XLK: SMH (14 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). SMH has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
SMHXLKSMH / XLK
Gain YTD21.312-0.815-2,615%
Net Assets48.2B90.8B53%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.08438%
Turnover12.005.00240%
Yield0.290.5750%
Fund Existence14 years27 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMHXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KEMX43.800.26
+0.60%
KraneShares MSCI Em Mkts ex CHN ETF
TURF35.110.03
+0.09%
T. Rowe Price Natural Resources ETF
DWX46.880.01
+0.02%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Intl Div ETF
CGBL35.80N/A
N/A
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
PSWD28.73-1.27
-4.24%
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Eq ETF

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+1.53%
LRCX - SMH
89%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
TSM - SMH
87%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
KLAC - SMH
86%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
AMAT - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
MPWR - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More