SMID
Price
$30.37
Change
+$0.69 (+2.32%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
247.2M
USLM
Price
$106.15
Change
-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMID vs USLM

Header iconSMID vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts SMID vs USLMBanner chart's image
Smith-Midland
Price$30.37
Change+$0.69 (+2.32%)
Volume$17.31K
Capitalization247.2M
United States Lime & Minerals
Price$106.15
Change-$0.18 (-0.17%)
Volume$233.03K
Capitalization1.68B
SMID vs USLM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMID vs. USLM commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMID is a StrongBuy and USLM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SMID: $30.37 vs. USLM: $106.15)
Brand notoriety: SMID and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMID: 155% vs. USLM: 254%
Market capitalization -- SMID: $247.2M vs. USLM: $1.68B
SMID [@Construction Materials] is valued at $247.2M. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMID’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the long-term than SMID.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMID’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMID’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

SMID (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.76% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

SMID is expected to report earnings on May 27, 2025.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.05% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USLM($1.68B) has a higher market cap than SMID($247M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than USLM: SMID (427.45) vs USLM (22.59). USLM YTD gains are higher at: -19.938 vs. SMID (-31.691). USLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 109M vs. SMID (3.43M). USLM has more cash in the bank: 188M vs. SMID (5.85M). USLM has less debt than SMID: USLM (5.5M) vs SMID (5.94M). USLM has higher revenues than SMID: USLM (281M) vs SMID (57.7M).
SMIDUSLMSMID / USLM
Capitalization247M1.68B15%
EBITDA3.43M109M3%
Gain YTD-31.691-19.938159%
P/E Ratio427.4522.591,892%
Revenue57.7M281M21%
Total Cash5.85M188M3%
Total Debt5.94M5.5M108%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMID vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
SMID
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1162
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5132
SMR RATING
1..100
4939
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8345
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMID's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as USLM (73) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (51) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's SMR Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as SMID (49) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (83) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (100) in the null industry. This means that USLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMIDUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FREAX14.48N/A
N/A
Nuveen Real Estate Securities A
GEMSX22.64N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Eq Svc
AULRX79.22N/A
N/A
American Century Ultra® R
GLNIX24.43N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery I
MCEMX13.92N/A
N/A
Martin Currie Emerging Markets IS

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+2.32%
BCC - SMID
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
USLM - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
EXP - SMID
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
CRH - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
KNF - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with KNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then KNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
-0.17%
KNF - USLM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
EXP - USLM
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
VMC - USLM
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
BCC - USLM
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
SMID - USLM
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.32%
More