MLM
Price
$583.39
Change
+$6.46 (+1.12%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.28B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
USLM
Price
$106.52
Change
-$0.77 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.19B
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MLM vs USLM

Header iconMLM vs USLM Comparison
Open Charts MLM vs USLMBanner chart's image
MLM vs USLM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MLM vs. USLM commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MLM is a Buy and USLM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (MLM: $576.93 vs. USLM: $107.14)
Brand notoriety: MLM and USLM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MLM: 95% vs. USLM: 219%
Market capitalization -- MLM: $34.28B vs. USLM: $3.19B
MLM [@Construction Materials] is valued at $34.28B. USLM’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $71.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $13.4B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MLM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUSLM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • USLM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLM is a better buy in the long-term than USLM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USLM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • USLM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, USLM is a better buy in the short-term than MLM.

Price Growth

MLM (@Construction Materials) experienced а +3.00% price change this week, while USLM (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

MLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

USLM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.86% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLM($34.3B) has a higher market cap than USLM($3.19B). MLM has higher P/E ratio than USLM: MLM (36.17) vs USLM (23.60). MLM YTD gains are higher at: -7.098 vs. USLM (-10.422). MLM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.09B vs. USLM (179M). USLM has less debt than MLM: USLM (3.63M) vs MLM (5.69B). MLM has higher revenues than USLM: MLM (6.35B) vs USLM (369M).
MLMUSLMMLM / USLM
Capitalization34.3B3.19B1,075%
EBITDA2.09B179M1,168%
Gain YTD-7.098-10.42268%
P/E Ratio36.1723.60153%
Revenue6.35B369M1,721%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.69B3.63M156,867%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MLM vs USLM: Fundamental Ratings
MLM
USLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1024
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4044
SMR RATING
1..100
3943
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USLM's Valuation (69) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (77). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (44). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's SMR Rating (39) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (43). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

USLM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as MLM (61). This means that USLM’s stock grew similarly to MLM’s over the last 12 months.

MLM's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as USLM (54). This means that MLM’s stock grew similarly to USLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MLMUSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
USLM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBRE127.863.22
+2.58%
Cbre Group
CVCO545.8010.91
+2.04%
Cavco Industries
TRST52.001.03
+2.02%
TrustCo Bank Corp
SJT3.82-0.02
-0.52%
San Juan Basin Royalty Trust UBI
TAOP1.35-0.03
-2.05%
Taoping Inc

MLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLM has been closely correlated with VMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLM jumps, then VMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLM
1D Price
Change %
MLM100%
+1.05%
VMC - MLM
88%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
EXP - MLM
68%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
CRH - MLM
67%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
TTAM - MLM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
BCC - MLM
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More

USLM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USLM has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USLM jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USLM
1D Price
Change %
USLM100%
-3.67%
BCC - USLM
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
TTAM - USLM
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
VMC - USLM
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
EXP - USLM
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
MLM - USLM
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More