| SPEM | XCEM | SPEM / XCEM | |
| Gain YTD | 13.023 | 31.869 | 41% |
| Net Assets | 17.7B | 2.06B | 858% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.16 | 44% |
| Turnover | 1.00 | 32.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 2.54 | 2.58 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| SPEM | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 18 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IYH | 73.89 | 0.91 | +1.25% |
| iShares US Healthcare ETF | |||
| RBIL | 49.94 | 0.02 | +0.05% |
| F/m Ultrshrt Trs Infl-Protd Sec TIPS ETF | |||
| MYCG | 24.97 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| State Street® My2027 Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| QB | 48.72 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF | |||
| RSPU | 76.05 | -1.79 | -2.30% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPEM has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPEM jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEM | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| JD - SPEM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| BILI - SPEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| BIDU - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| BABA - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | -8.57% | ||
| BZUN - SPEM | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XCEM has been loosely correlated with Q. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XCEM jumps, then Q could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XCEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XCEM | 100% | +0.49% | ||
| Q - XCEM | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
| LTM - XCEM | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.10% | ||
| XP - XCEM | 48% Loosely correlated | +5.13% | ||
| GFI - XCEM | 45% Loosely correlated | +5.19% | ||
| CCU - XCEM | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||