| SPEM | XCEM | SPEM / XCEM | |
| Gain YTD | 9.894 | 23.540 | 42% |
| Net Assets | 17.3B | 1.95B | 888% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.07 | 0.16 | 44% |
| Turnover | 1.00 | 32.00 | 3% |
| Yield | 2.54 | 2.58 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| SPEM | XCEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XLYI | 22.75 | 0.63 | +2.83% |
| State Street®CnsmrDiscSelSectSPDR®PrmETF | |||
| USMC | 74.11 | 0.32 | +0.44% |
| Principal US Mega-Cap ETF | |||
| PIPE | 30.48 | 0.13 | +0.42% |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| SDHY | 16.14 | 0.02 | +0.12% |
| PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund | |||
| INKM | 34.44 | -0.03 | -0.08% |
| State Street® Income Allocation ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPEM has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPEM jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEM | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| JD - SPEM | 71% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| BILI - SPEM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| BIDU - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +3.38% | ||
| BABA - SPEM | 67% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| BZUN - SPEM | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.69% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XCEM has been loosely correlated with Q. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XCEM jumps, then Q could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XCEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XCEM | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| Q - XCEM | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| LTM - XCEM | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| XP - XCEM | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| GFI - XCEM | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
| CCU - XCEM | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||