Regional and community banks occupy a distinctive space in the U.S. financial sector—balancing localized relationship banking with the pressures of interest rate cycles, credit risk management, and evolving regulatory frameworks. This stock comparison examines two bank holding companies that operate at different ends of the regional-bank spectrum: SRCE (1st Source Corporation), a diversified Midwest-based institution with a national specialty finance arm, and TSBK (Timberland Bancorp), a tightly focused community bank serving Washington state. For investors evaluating regional bank exposure, understanding the trade-offs between scale, diversification, asset quality, and yield can help clarify which profile better matches a given portfolio strategy. This comparison draws on recent financial disclosures, market performance data, and observable business trends to provide a balanced, data-driven perspective.
SRCE, 1st Source Corporation, is a bank holding company founded in 1863 and headquartered in South Bend, Indiana, with approximately $9.1 billion in total assets and roughly 1,190 employees. Its subsidiary, 1st Source Bank, operates 78 banking centers across northern Indiana and southwestern Michigan, while its Specialty Finance Group provides equipment, aircraft, and vehicle financing on a national scale. The company also maintains a growing renewable energy finance division, with more than $652 million in renewable energy loans and leases and over $198 million in tax equity investments as of late 2025.
In recent market activity, SRCE shares have demonstrated a gradual upward trajectory, reflecting consecutive quarters of net interest margin (NIM) expansion—the difference between what a bank earns on loans and pays on deposits. For the full year 2025, the company reported net income of $158.28 million, a 19.3% increase year-over-year, with earnings per share reaching $6.41. Return on average assets (ROA)—a core measure of how efficiently a bank uses its assets to generate profit—improved to 1.76%. The Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio, a key regulatory measure of a bank's financial strength, ended the year at 15.52%, well above required minimums. However, asset quality has drawn market attention: nonperforming assets rose to 1.10% of loans and leases, up from 0.46% a year earlier, driven primarily by a troubled relationship in the auto and light truck portfolio within the Specialty Finance Group.
TSBK, Timberland Bancorp, is the holding company for Timberland Bank, a community-oriented institution founded in 1915 and headquartered in Hoquiam, Washington. With roughly $2.01 billion in total assets, 23 branches, and approximately 281 employees, TSBK operates across six Washington counties—Grays Harbor, Thurston, Pierce, King, Kitsap, and Lewis—providing deposit products, mortgage lending, construction financing, and commercial business loans. Its loan portfolio is overwhelmingly real-estate-focused, with mortgage loans comprising approximately 89% of total loans, including a substantial commercial real estate (CRE) allocation of 39%.
TSBK's fiscal year ended September 30, 2025, produced record results: net income grew 20% to $29.16 million, diluted earnings per share rose 22% to $3.67, and the company surpassed the $2 billion asset threshold for the first time in its history. The NIM expanded to 3.82% in the fourth fiscal quarter—a 24-basis-point improvement year-over-year. Quarterly ROA reached 1.68% and return on average equity (ROE) hit 12.97%. Credit quality remains a relative bright spot: nonperforming assets represented just 0.23% of total assets, and the bank recorded no net charge-offs during the most recent quarter. The company also announced an 8% dividend increase and plans to open a new branch in University Place, signaling management confidence in continued organic growth. TSBK shares have rallied in recent months, reflecting the market's favorable reception to consistent earnings improvement, margin expansion, and strong credit discipline.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in navigating comparisons like this one, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI Trading Bots covering thousands of tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. The bots span a wide range of trading styles—from 5-minute and 15-minute high-frequency agents to longer-swing 60-minute strategies—with annualized returns among top performers ranging from roughly 75% to well over 500%. Key statistics such as Sharpe ratios (a measure of risk-adjusted return), profit factors, win rates, and maximum drawdowns are transparently displayed for each bot, enabling users to evaluate performance beyond headline numbers. All bots operate with different strategies, timeframes, risk parameters, and sets of tickers they actively trade. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to discover which AI-driven strategies are currently capturing opportunities across the market.
While both SRCE and TSBK are bank holding companies, their underlying exposures and growth drivers differ substantially. SRCE's business model blends traditional community banking with a national specialty finance operation spanning construction equipment, aircraft, auto and truck leasing, and renewable energy project finance. This diversification provides multiple revenue levers but also introduces credit complexity—as evidenced by the recent uptick in nonperforming assets tied to the auto and truck portfolio. In contrast, TSBK's model is simpler and more concentrated: real estate lending in the Pacific Northwest, with steady deposit gathering from a loyal community base. That simplicity has translated into superior asset quality metrics, with TSBK's NPA ratio running at roughly one-fifth of SRCE's level.
On profitability, the two are closer than their size disparity suggests. SRCE's NIM of 4.07% for fiscal 2025 compares favorably to TSBK's 3.76%, reflecting SRCE's higher-yielding specialty loan mix. SRCE's efficiency ratio—a measure of non-interest expense relative to revenue—also ran lower (in the 48% range), indicating tighter cost control relative to TSBK's approximately 55%. However, TSBK's forward-looking momentum appears stronger on a relative basis: record earnings, accelerating quarterly NIM, zero net charge-offs, branch expansion, and a steadily climbing tangible book value per share. SRCE, meanwhile, faces the near-term headwind of managing credit deterioration in its specialty auto portfolio, which could pressure provisioning and earnings if economic conditions soften further.
From a market positioning standpoint, SRCE carries a beta of approximately 0.57 and TSBK approximately 0.35—both below the broader market, consistent with regional bank stocks—but TSBK's lower beta reflects its insulated community-bank character. For income-focused investors, TSBK's dividend yield of roughly 2.8–3.0% slightly exceeds SRCE's ~2.35%, though SRCE's 38-year streak of annual dividend increases carries its own appeal for long-term income compounding. Liquidity is another point of differentiation: TSBK's average daily trading volume is notably thin (around 15,000 shares), while SRCE trades roughly 90,000–140,000 shares daily, offering greater ease of entry and exit for institutional and active investors.
Based on observable trend consistency, asset quality stability, and forward-looking catalysts, a probabilistic assessment suggests that Tickeron's AI would likely tilt in favor of TSBK under current conditions. TSBK's combination of record earnings, expanding NIM, near-zero credit stress, dividend growth, and branch expansion offers a cleaner, more predictable trajectory. While SRCE possesses a more diversified revenue base, a longer dividend growth history, and a compelling renewable energy finance narrative, the rising nonperforming asset trend in its specialty auto and truck portfolio introduces an element of uncertainty that may weigh on near-term relative momentum. In the context of an AI-driven evaluation—where consistency of trend signals, manageable drawdown risk, and fundamental stability are weighted heavily—TSBK's steadier credit profile and sequential improvement across key metrics provide a more favorable risk-reward calculus at this juncture. This assessment reflects a probabilistic, data-oriented view and should not be interpreted as a definitive prediction of future stock price movement.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SRCE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTSBK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SRCE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
SRCE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.01% price change this week, while TSBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.83% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.70%.
SRCE is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| SRCE | TSBK | SRCE / TSBK | |
| Capitalization | 2.18B | 352M | 618% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.213 | 27.553 | 168% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.97 | 11.54 | 112% |
| Revenue | 443M | 81.6M | 543% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 23.2M | - |
| Total Debt | 230M | 22.9M | 1,004% |
SRCE | TSBK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | 61 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TSBK's Valuation (51) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (71) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TSBK’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TSBK (25) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to TSBK’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TSBK (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to TSBK’s over the last 12 months.
SRCE's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TSBK (44) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SRCE’s stock grew similarly to TSBK’s over the last 12 months.
TSBK's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SRCE (30) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TSBK’s stock grew similarly to SRCE’s over the last 12 months.
| SRCE | TSBK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 56% | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 65% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TSBK has been closely correlated with FBIZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TSBK jumps, then FBIZ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSBK | 100% | +1.31% | ||
| FBIZ - TSBK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.61% | ||
| FMBH - TSBK | 76% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| IBCP - TSBK | 74% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| ORRF - TSBK | 74% Closely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| SRCE - TSBK | 73% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||