SSO
Price
$67.00
Change
-$0.21 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
8.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UYG
Price
$91.83
Change
+$2.52 (+2.82%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
796.54M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SSO vs UYG

SSO vs UYG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) vs. ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG)

Key Takeaways

  • Both SSO and UYG are leveraged ETFs from ProShares that seek 2x daily returns of their benchmarks, making them suitable primarily for short-term tactical use rather than long-term holding due to daily rebalancing and potential volatility decay.
  • SSO provides amplified exposure to the broad S&P 500 Index with approximately 500 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.87%, offering diversified access across technology, financial services, and other major sectors.
  • UYG delivers 2x daily exposure specifically to the S&P Financial Select Sector Index, concentrating on roughly 76 financial companies with a net expense ratio of 0.94%, resulting in higher sector-specific risk and reward potential.
  • Structural differences center on diversification: SSO spreads risk across the entire large-cap U.S. equity market, while UYG focuses exclusively on banks, insurance, capital markets, and related financial services firms.
  • Cost efficiency favors SSO slightly due to its lower expense ratio, though both carry higher fees than unleveraged equity ETFs because of the derivatives and daily reset mechanics required to maintain leverage.
  • In the current market environment, relative positioning depends on investor views on broad economic growth versus financial sector momentum driven by interest rates, regulatory changes, and credit cycles.

Introduction

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) and ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) represent two distinct leveraged strategies within the ProShares lineup. They do not compete directly as substitutes; instead, they offer investors alternative ways to express bullish views on either the broad U.S. large-cap market or the financial sector specifically. Both target 2x daily performance of their respective indices using derivatives and daily rebalancing, appealing to traders seeking amplified short-term exposure. This comparison highlights their structural differences, risk profiles, and suitability within varying market conditions, helping investors align choices with objectives such as broad equity participation versus targeted financials sector conviction.

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) Overview

ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P 500 Index. The fund maintains a passive leveraged structure with daily rebalancing to achieve its target exposure. It typically holds a large number of positions, around 500, mirroring the broad market-cap-weighted composition of its benchmark. Top holdings generally include major technology and growth companies such as NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet. Sector allocations reflect the S&P 500, with significant weights in technology, financial services, consumer discretionary, and communication services. The net expense ratio stands at 0.87%. As a geared product, SSO uses swaps, futures, and other derivatives rather than direct equity ownership, distinguishing it from traditional unleveraged index ETFs. Liquidity remains strong given its substantial assets and trading volume.

ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) Overview

ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the S&P Financial Select Sector Index. This passive leveraged ETF also employs daily rebalancing and derivative instruments to deliver its target. The underlying index contains approximately 76 companies focused on the financial sector. Top holdings typically feature leading institutions such as Berkshire Hathaway, JPMorgan Chase, Visa, Mastercard, and Bank of America. Sector allocation is concentrated entirely within financials, encompassing banks, insurance, capital markets, consumer finance, and mortgage real estate investment trusts. The net expense ratio is 0.94%. Like its counterpart, UYG relies on swaps and similar tools rather than physical stock holdings, resulting in a more concentrated risk profile tied to interest rate sensitivity, regulatory developments, and credit conditions. Trading liquidity is adequate but generally lower than broader-market leveraged peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the leveraged equity space, with SSO tied to overall U.S. large-cap equity performance and UYG linked specifically to the financial services sector. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate expectations from the Federal Reserve, inflation trends, and corporate earnings growth. The financial sector faces catalysts such as potential rate cuts that could boost lending margins and capital markets activity, alongside regulatory scrutiny and credit quality developments. Broader market exposure in SSO benefits from technology sector strength and overall economic expansion, while UYG amplifies sensitivity to banking profitability, insurance underwriting results, and asset management flows. Sector risks for financials include higher volatility from policy shifts and economic cycles compared with the diversified S&P 500. Capital flows into leveraged products often increase during periods of strong momentum or anticipated volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SSO has generally delivered amplified returns aligned with broad equity advances driven by technology leadership and resilient corporate earnings. Its diversified holdings provide relative stability compared with sector-concentrated peers during rotations away from financials. UYG exhibits higher volatility and stronger sensitivity to interest rate movements, financial earnings reports, and regulatory news, leading to more pronounced swings in periods of sector rotation or credit market stress. Over broader timeframes, relative positioning favors SSO for investors seeking leveraged participation in overall market growth, while UYG suits those with a tactical bullish outlook on banks and financial intermediaries. Both products experience compounding effects from daily resets that can cause returns to diverge from simple 2x multiples over multi-day periods, particularly in volatile or sideways markets. Liquidity profiles support tactical trading in both, though SSO typically offers tighter spreads and higher volume.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on structural strength, cost efficiency, diversification profile, and broader sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to ProShares Ultra S&P500 (SSO). Its slightly lower expense ratio, extensive holdings across multiple sectors, and exposure to resilient large-cap growth drivers provide a more balanced risk-reward framework within the leveraged category compared with the concentrated financials focus of UYG. This assessment reflects observable characteristics rather than short-term price action.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SSO vs. UYG commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSO is a StrongBuy and UYG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSO has more net assets: 8.02B vs. UYG (797M). SSO has a higher annual dividend yield than UYG: SSO (16.156) vs UYG (0.461). SSO was incepted earlier than UYG: SSO (20 years) vs UYG (19 years). SSO (0.87) has a lower expense ratio than UYG (0.94). UYG has a higher turnover SSO (4.00) vs SSO (4.00).
SSOUYGSSO / UYG
Gain YTD16.1560.4613,505%
Net Assets8.02B797M1,007%
Total Expense Ratio0.870.9493%
Turnover4.0012.0033%
Yield0.670.8876%
Fund Existence20 years19 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSOUYG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SSO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGSLX138.961.78
+1.30%
Vanguard Real Estate Index Admiral
MDDIX9.380.12
+1.30%
MassMutual Diversified Value I
SVFKX96.960.96
+1.00%
Smead Value R2
IVEIX13.010.11
+0.85%
Nomura Climate Solutions I
PJARX12.15-0.04
-0.33%
Principal SmallCap Value II R3

SSO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SSO has been loosely correlated with MSFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SSO jumps, then MSFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSO
1D Price
Change %
SSO100%
-0.31%
MSFT - SSO
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AAPL - SSO
62%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMZN - SSO
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NVDA - SSO
56%
Loosely correlated
N/A

UYG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UYG has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UYG jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UYG
1D Price
Change %
UYG100%
+2.82%
SF - UYG
78%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
BAC - UYG
75%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
JPM - UYG
73%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
AXP - UYG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
COF - UYG
72%
Closely correlated
+0.15%
More