STT
Price
$113.97
Change
+$0.77 (+0.68%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.84B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TETAA
Price
$15.87
Change
+$0.17 (+1.08%)
Updated
Nov 6 closing price
Capitalization
24.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

STT vs TETAA

Header iconSTT vs TETAA Comparison
Open Charts STT vs TETAABanner chart's image
State Street
Price$113.97
Change+$0.77 (+0.68%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization31.84B
Teton Advisors
Price$15.87
Change+$0.17 (+1.08%)
Volume$640
Capitalization24.68M
STT vs TETAA Comparison Chart in %
STT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TETAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STT vs. TETAA commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STT is a Hold and TETAA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (STT: $113.20 vs. TETAA: $15.87)
Brand notoriety: STT and TETAA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STT: 78% vs. TETAA: 178%
Market capitalization -- STT: $31.84B vs. TETAA: $24.68M
STT [@Investment Managers] is valued at $31.84B. TETAA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $24.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $157.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STT’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileTETAA’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • STT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • TETAA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than TETAA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TETAA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TETAA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TETAA is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

STT (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.22% price change this week, while TETAA (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

STT is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.52% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($31.8B) has a higher market cap than TETAA($24.7M). TETAA has higher P/E ratio than STT: TETAA (20.88) vs STT (12.10). STT YTD gains are higher at: 19.774 vs. TETAA (17.730). STT has more cash in the bank: 4.02B vs. TETAA (30.5M). TETAA has less debt than STT: TETAA (67.8K) vs STT (34.5B). STT has higher revenues than TETAA: STT (13.7B) vs TETAA (9.75M).
STTTETAASTT / TETAA
Capitalization31.8B24.7M128,745%
EBITDAN/A416K-
Gain YTD19.77417.730112%
P/E Ratio12.1020.8858%
Revenue13.7B9.75M140,513%
Total Cash4.02B30.5M13,180%
Total Debt34.5B67.8K50,884,956%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STT vs TETAA: Fundamental Ratings
STT
TETAA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
31100
SMR RATING
1..100
989
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (99) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (100) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for TETAA (89) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as TETAA (52) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to TETAA’s over the last 12 months.

TETAA's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as STT (69) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that TETAA’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STTTETAA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
25%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
STT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TETAA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIL68.421.18
+1.75%
Global X Silver Miners ETF
FEUS71.760.15
+0.22%
FlexShares ESG & Clmt US Lrg Cap Cr Idx
DNL39.850.06
+0.15%
WisdomTree Global ex-U.S. Quality Gr ETF
LOCT23.720.02
+0.07%
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buf ETF -Oct
CNAV29.47-0.07
-0.23%
Mohr Company Nav ETF

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
+0.71%
NTRS - STT
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
BLK - STT
78%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
BN - STT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
JHG - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
AMP - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
More

TETAA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TETAA and SRXXF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TETAA and SRXXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TETAA
1D Price
Change %
TETAA100%
N/A
SRXXF - TETAA
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTRS - TETAA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
STT - TETAA
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
STJPF - TETAA
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VSQTF - TETAA
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
More