Ad is loading...
STZ
Price
$237.51
Change
-$4.49 (-1.86%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
46 days until earnings call
TAP
Price
$62.42
Change
-$0.31 (-0.49%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

STZ vs TAP

Header iconSTZ vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts STZ vs TAPBanner chart's image
Constellation Brands
Price$237.51
Change-$4.49 (-1.86%)
Volume$1.43M
CapitalizationN/A
Molson Coors Beverage
Price$62.42
Change-$0.31 (-0.49%)
Volume$2.25M
CapitalizationN/A
STZ vs TAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
STZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STZ vs. TAP commentary
Nov 17, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Sell and TAP is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 17, 2024
Stock price -- (STZ: $237.51 vs. TAP: $62.42)
Brand notoriety: STZ and TAP are both notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STZ: 113% vs. TAP: 126%
Market capitalization -- STZ: $48.62B vs. TAP: $14.3B
STZ [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $48.62B. TAP’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $14.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $20.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the short-term than TAP.

Price Growth

STZ (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +1.34% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +4.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

STZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 02, 2025.

TAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (-2.04% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STZ($48.6B) has a higher market cap than TAP($14.3B). STZ has higher P/E ratio than TAP: STZ (30.86) vs TAP (15.41). TAP YTD gains are higher at: 4.414 vs. STZ (-0.168). STZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.86B vs. TAP (2.17B). TAP has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. STZ (200M). TAP has less debt than STZ: TAP (6.27B) vs STZ (11.7B). TAP has higher revenues than STZ: TAP (11.7B) vs STZ (9.82B).
STZTAPSTZ / TAP
Capitalization48.6B14.3B340%
EBITDA2.86B2.17B132%
Gain YTD-0.1684.414-4%
P/E Ratio30.8615.41200%
Revenue9.82B11.7B84%
Total Cash200M869M23%
Total Debt11.7B6.27B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STZ vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
STZ
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1442
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5159
SMR RATING
1..100
7672
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5723
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (33) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (48). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as TAP (59). This means that STZ’s stock grew similarly to TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's SMR Rating (72) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (76). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Price Growth Rating (23) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STZ (57). This means that TAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAP (99). This means that STZ’s stock grew significantly faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STZTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
STZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PROF8.01N/A
-0.02%
Profound Medical Corp
MKL1707.64-2.39
-0.14%
Markel Group
GHC926.00-11.11
-1.19%
Graham Holdings Company
MRNS0.30-0.01
-2.24%
Marinus Pharmaceuticals
KIND2.37-0.07
-2.87%
Nextdoor Holdings

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
-1.86%
TAP - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
DEO - STZ
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
BUD - STZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
SAM - STZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
NAPA - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

TAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAP has been loosely correlated with STZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAP jumps, then STZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAP
1D Price
Change %
TAP100%
-0.49%
STZ - TAP
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.86%
SAM - TAP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
DEO - TAP
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
NAPA - TAP
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
CCU - TAP
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
More