STZ
Price
$184.31
Change
-$0.26 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
48.62B
75 days until earnings call
TAP
Price
$55.23
Change
+$0.25 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
14.3B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

STZ vs TAP

Header iconSTZ vs TAP Comparison
Open Charts STZ vs TAPBanner chart's image
Constellation Brands
Price$184.31
Change-$0.26 (-0.14%)
Volume$2.84M
Capitalization48.62B
Molson Coors Beverage
Price$55.23
Change+$0.25 (+0.45%)
Volume$1.94M
Capitalization14.3B
STZ vs TAP Comparison Chart
Loading...
STZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
STZ vs. TAP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is STZ is a Hold and TAP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (STZ: $184.31 vs. TAP: $55.23)
Brand notoriety: STZ and TAP are both notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: STZ: 149% vs. TAP: 109%
Market capitalization -- STZ: $48.62B vs. TAP: $14.3B
STZ [@Beverages: Alcoholic] is valued at $48.62B. TAP’s [@Beverages: Alcoholic] market capitalization is $14.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry ranges from $19.33T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Alcoholic] industry is $20.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

STZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • STZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the long-term than TAP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

STZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • STZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • TAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STZ is a better buy in the short-term than TAP.

Price Growth

STZ (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а +1.38% price change this week, while TAP (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was +5.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was +7.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

STZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 03, 2025.

TAP is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Alcoholic (+7.57% weekly)

The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STZ($48.6B) has a higher market cap than TAP($14.3B). STZ has higher P/E ratio than TAP: STZ (30.86) vs TAP (15.41). TAP YTD gains are higher at: -3.646 vs. STZ (-16.602). STZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.86B vs. TAP (2.17B). TAP has more cash in the bank: 869M vs. STZ (200M). TAP has less debt than STZ: TAP (6.27B) vs STZ (11.7B). TAP has higher revenues than STZ: TAP (11.7B) vs STZ (9.82B).
STZTAPSTZ / TAP
Capitalization48.6B14.3B340%
EBITDA2.86B2.17B132%
Gain YTD-16.602-3.646455%
P/E Ratio30.8615.41200%
Revenue9.82B11.7B84%
Total Cash200M869M23%
Total Debt11.7B6.27B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STZ vs TAP: Fundamental Ratings
STZ
TAP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8463
SMR RATING
1..100
8079
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1499
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TAP's Valuation (30) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (42). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (84). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's SMR Rating (79) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (80). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

TAP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is in the same range as STZ (65). This means that TAP’s stock grew similarly to STZ’s over the last 12 months.

STZ's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Beverages Alcoholic industry is significantly better than the same rating for TAP (99). This means that STZ’s stock grew significantly faster than TAP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
STZTAP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
44%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
STZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLX2.270.07
+3.18%
RLX Technology
PFG81.660.52
+0.64%
Principal Financial Group
BTMD5.64N/A
N/A
Biote Corp
BFS36.88-0.08
-0.22%
Saul Centers
JCTC4.52-0.18
-3.73%
Jewett-Cameron Trading Company Ltd

STZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STZ has been loosely correlated with TAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STZ jumps, then TAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STZ
1D Price
Change %
STZ100%
-0.14%
TAP - STZ
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
DEO - STZ
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
BUD - STZ
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
SAM - STZ
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
NAPA - STZ
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More