It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TOMZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TOMZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
TOMZ (@Industrial Specialties) experienced а +6.08% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was -3.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was +5.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +82.50%.
TOMZ is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.
Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
TOMZ | ZWS | TOMZ / ZWS | |
Capitalization | 21.1M | 7.73B | 0% |
EBITDA | -3.83M | 347M | -1% |
Gain YTD | 0.000 | 24.532 | - |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 46.60 | - |
Revenue | 6.22M | 1.61B | 0% |
Total Cash | 569K | 202M | 0% |
Total Debt | 3.36M | 556M | 1% |
TOMZ | ZWS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOMZ's Valuation (77) in the null industry is in the same range as ZWS (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that TOMZ’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Industrial Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for TOMZ (100) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew significantly faster than TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's SMR Rating (68) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TOMZ (99) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as TOMZ (45) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TOMZ (93) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than TOMZ’s over the last 12 months.
TOMZ | ZWS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago48% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago71% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago50% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 5 days ago55% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago77% | 19 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% | 3 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago67% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOMZ and BWEN have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOMZ and BWEN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOMZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TOMZ | 100% | +2.94% | ||
BWEN - TOMZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
KRNT - TOMZ | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.24% | ||
CSW - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
MIR - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.46% | ||
ZWS - TOMZ | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ZWS | 100% | +0.30% | ||
XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.13% | ||
HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More |