In the water solutions sector, PNR and ZWS stand out as key players amid growing demand for sustainable water management and infrastructure upgrades. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning to aid investors and traders evaluating sector opportunities. With both companies benefiting from trends in water treatment and conservation, yet facing distinct challenges like earnings anticipation and economic sensitivities, understanding their relative strengths helps in portfolio allocation or short-term trading decisions in the current market environment.
Pentair plc (PNR), headquartered in London, designs and manufactures water solutions across Flow, Water Solutions, and Pool segments, serving residential, commercial, and industrial markets globally. Recent market activity has shown mixed results for PNR, with shares rallying from around $84 to $92 amid broader industrial recovery, yet facing headwinds from analyst downgrades. Bank of America and others reduced price targets ahead of Q1 earnings on April 28, citing potential weakness, contributing to cautious sentiment. Year-to-date gains hover near 11%, underperforming the one-year return of about 3%, influenced by sector volatility and anticipation of results. Technical indicators like RSI and Momentum suggest upward shifts, but Aroon signals a possible downward trend, balancing optimism with risks.
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS), based in Milwaukee, specializes in water dispensing, safety, and flow control products for commercial and institutional use. In recent weeks, ZWS has demonstrated robust performance, surpassing revenue expectations in its latest quarterly results with sales up over 11%, boosting investor confidence. Shares have climbed steadily, crossing above the 50-day moving average and showing bullish MACD and Momentum crossovers. Year-to-date returns stand at about 13%, with one-year gains exceeding 57%, driven by strong demand in water infrastructure. While overbought RSI and Stochastic levels hint at near-term pullbacks, overall trend strength supports positive sentiment in recent market activity.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, tailored for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto in varying market conditions. These bots showcase impressive stats, including annualized returns from 15% to over 167%, win rates between 48% and 88%, and profit factors up to 6.94. Diverse strategies range from trend-following in semiconductors and industrials to multi-ticker agents spanning energy, tech, and defense sectors, with average trade durations from 1 day to 55 days. Virtual and brokerage agents incorporate risk management like corridor take-profits and stop-losses. Traders can explore these high-conviction options to align with current trends—visit the page for live performance details and to start copying top bots.
PNR and ZWS share sector exposure to water technologies but differ in business models: PNR's diversified portfolio includes consumer pool products alongside industrial pumps, offering resilience but cyclicality, while ZWS emphasizes commercial plumbing and safety solutions with steadier institutional demand. Growth drivers for ZWS include infrastructure spending, evident in recent sales beats, versus PNR's reliance on housing and industrial recovery. Momentum favors ZWS with stronger recent technicals, though PNR holds a lower valuation (P/E 23 vs. 43) and larger market cap ($15B vs. $9B). Risk factors include earnings volatility for PNR and overbought conditions for ZWS; sentiment leans positive for both amid water scarcity themes.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward ZWS due to its consistent upward trend signals, including bullish moving average crossovers and positive MACD, alongside superior recent momentum and sales performance. While PNR shows recovery potential post-earnings with higher analyst targets, its mixed technicals like Aroon downtrends introduce more uncertainty. Probabilistic edge favors ZWS for trend continuation in the near term, though both merit monitoring for sector catalysts.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PNR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileZWS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PNR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PNR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +0.89% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +2.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.95%.
PNR is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
@Industrial Specialties (-4.36% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
| PNR | ZWS | PNR / ZWS | |
| Capitalization | 11.9B | 8.08B | 147% |
| EBITDA | 952M | 392M | 243% |
| Gain YTD | -28.740 | 4.560 | -630% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.54 | 39.34 | 47% |
| Revenue | 4.2B | 1.74B | 241% |
| Total Cash | 67.7M | 274M | 25% |
| Total Debt | 2.08B | 552M | 377% |
PNR | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 54 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PNR's Valuation (19) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZWS (54) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that PNR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNR (83) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNR’s over the last 12 months.
PNR's SMR Rating (48) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as ZWS (62) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that PNR’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PNR (63) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to PNR’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as PNR (79) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to PNR’s over the last 12 months.
| PNR | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 48% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 62% | 7 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | +0.54% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
More | ||||