Advertisement
HLMN vs ZWS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HLMN is a Hold and ZWS is a StrongBuy.
HLMN | ZWS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 21 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 86 | 51 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 84 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HLMN's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as ZWS (75) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that HLMN’s stock grew similarly to ZWS’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLMN (100) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLMN’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's SMR Rating (51) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLMN (86) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLMN’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HLMN (74) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to HLMN’s over the last 12 months.
ZWS's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as HLMN (95) in the null industry. This means that ZWS’s stock grew similarly to HLMN’s over the last 12 months.
| HLMN | ZWS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 9 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HLMN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while ZWS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- HLMN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- ZWS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HLMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZWS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HLMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- ZWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HLMN (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while ZWS (@Industrial Specialties) price change was +1.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +1.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.64%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Specialties industry was -4.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
HLMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
ZWS is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (+1.54% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Specialties (-4.80% weekly)Companies in the industrial specialties industry process basic materials and minerals into various specialty products, such as flat and safety glass, fire retardant products, paints and coatings. Examples of companies operating in this industry are Sherwin-Williams Company, PPG Industries, Inc. and RPM International Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OILU | 47.94 | 2.62 | +5.78% |
| MicroSectors Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. 3x Leveraged ETN (OILU) | |||
| FTXR | 41.17 | 0.41 | +1.01% |
| First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) | |||
| IWB | 416.97 | 0.84 | +0.20% |
| iShares Russell 1000 ETF (IWB) | |||
| GOCT | 42.71 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - October (GOCT) | |||
| SPIT | 30.59 | -0.05 | -0.17% |
| F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT) | |||
HLMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLMN has been closely correlated with HLIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLMN jumps, then HLIO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLMN | 100% | -0.72% | ||
| HLIO - HLMN | 71% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| SWK - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| DCI - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| GGG - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| NDSN - HLMN | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
ZWS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZWS has been closely correlated with XYL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ZWS jumps, then XYL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ZWS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZWS | 100% | +1.57% | ||
| XYL - ZWS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| LECO - ZWS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| HLIO - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| HLMN - ZWS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| PNR - ZWS | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
More | ||||