Advertisement
TZOO vs UPWK
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is TZOO is a StrongBuy and UPWK is a Hold.
TZOO | UPWK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 9 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 34 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UPWK's Valuation (57) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TZOO (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that UPWK’s stock grew somewhat faster than TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
UPWK's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TZOO (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that UPWK’s stock grew similarly to TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's SMR Rating (9) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UPWK (52) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than UPWK’s over the last 12 months.
UPWK's Price Growth Rating (80) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TZOO (86) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that UPWK’s stock grew similarly to TZOO’s over the last 12 months.
TZOO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UPWK (45) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TZOO’s stock grew somewhat faster than UPWK’s over the last 12 months.
| TZOO | UPWK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
TZOO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while UPWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- TZOO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UPWK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
TZOO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UPWK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- TZOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- UPWK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
TZOO (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -4.90% price change this week, while UPWK (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +3.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.67%.
Reported Earning Dates
TZOO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
UPWK is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-2.71% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISMD | 46.61 | 0.26 | +0.56% |
| Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF (ISMD) | |||
| NVBW | 36.59 | 0.07 | +0.20% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer20 Nov ETF (NVBW) | |||
| SQS | 28.17 | N/A | N/A |
| Sapient Quality Select ETF | |||
| XIMR | 31.24 | -0.19 | -0.62% |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March (XIMR) | |||
| SMCZ | 4.42 | -0.20 | -4.33% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Short SMCI ETF (SMCZ) | |||
TZOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TZOO has been loosely correlated with QNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TZOO jumps, then QNST could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TZOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TZOO | 100% | -4.73% | ||
| QNST - TZOO | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| MGNI - TZOO | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| ZD - TZOO | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| UPWK - TZOO | 27% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| DLX - TZOO | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
More | ||||
UPWK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPWK has been loosely correlated with CARG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPWK jumps, then CARG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UPWK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UPWK | 100% | +2.21% | ||
| CARG - UPWK | 39% Loosely correlated | -4.59% | ||
| Z - UPWK | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.29% | ||
| ZG - UPWK | 38% Loosely correlated | +2.56% | ||
| NRDS - UPWK | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.39% | ||
| YELP - UPWK | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||