Advertisement
VIR vs XNCR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is VIR is a Hold and XNCR is a Hold.
| VIR | XNCR | VIR / XNCR | |
| Capitalization | 1.8B | 1.81B | 99% |
| EBITDA | -268.68M | -123.6M | 217% |
| Gain YTD | 76.119 | 59.438 | 128% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 303M | 105M | 289% |
| Total Cash | 533M | 456M | 117% |
| Total Debt | 93.3M | 170M | 55% |
VIR | XNCR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 88 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VIR's Valuation (57) in the null industry is in the same range as XNCR (89) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that VIR’s stock grew similarly to XNCR’s over the last 12 months.
VIR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XNCR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that VIR’s stock grew similarly to XNCR’s over the last 12 months.
VIR's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as XNCR (97) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that VIR’s stock grew similarly to XNCR’s over the last 12 months.
XNCR's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as VIR (37) in the null industry. This means that XNCR’s stock grew similarly to VIR’s over the last 12 months.
XNCR's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as VIR (23) in the null industry. This means that XNCR’s stock grew similarly to VIR’s over the last 12 months.
| VIR | XNCR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 73% | 12 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
VIR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while XNCR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- VIR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XNCR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VIR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XNCR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- VIR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- XNCR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
VIR (@Biotechnology) experienced а -6.72% price change this week, while XNCR (@Biotechnology) price change was -8.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -6.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2531.70%.
Reported Earning Dates
VIR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
XNCR is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Biotechnology (-6.09% weekly)Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMEU | 6.87 | 0.45 | +7.01% |
| T-Rex 2X Long GME Daily Target ETF | |||
| DDWM | 46.89 | 0.41 | +0.87% |
| WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF | |||
| BCLO | 49.72 | 0.03 | +0.05% |
| iShares BBB-B CLO Active ETF | |||
| LGDX | 25.67 | N/A | N/A |
| Intech S&P Large Cap Diversified Alpha ETF | |||
| HYBB | 45.94 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | |||
VIR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VIR has been loosely correlated with BEAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VIR jumps, then BEAM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VIR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VIR | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| BEAM - VIR | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| DNLI - VIR | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
| EDIT - VIR | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| RCUS - VIR | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.97% | ||
| CRBU - VIR | 49% Loosely correlated | -7.30% | ||
More | ||||
XNCR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XNCR has been loosely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XNCR jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XNCR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XNCR | 100% | +0.62% | ||
| VCYT - XNCR | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.76% | ||
| KURA - XNCR | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| MLTX - XNCR | 49% Loosely correlated | -5.08% | ||
| RCUS - XNCR | 48% Loosely correlated | -5.97% | ||
| VIR - XNCR | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||