ACLS
Price
$155.18
Change
-$6.46 (-4.00%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
4.77B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FORM
Price
$126.27
Change
-$1.72 (-1.34%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.84B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QCOM
Price
$201.49
Change
+$1.41 (+0.70%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
212.37B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACLS or FORM or QCOM

Header iconACLS vs FORM vs QCOM Comparison
Open Charts ACLS vs FORM vs QCOMBanner chart's image
ACLS vs FORM vs QCOM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) vs. FormFactor (FORM) vs. QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ACLS has delivered strong YTD gains of approximately 74%, driven by semiconductor equipment demand, though recent volatility reflects sector swings.
  • FORM leads with over 160% YTD return, fueled by record Q1 revenue and AI-related probe card growth in testing.
  • QCOM shows steadier performance with recent surges from AI catalysts and a $20 billion buyback, amid diversified revenue streams.
  • All three benefit from semiconductor tailwinds, but FORM exhibits superior recent momentum, while QCOM offers scale and stability.
  • Relative performance highlights equipment makers (ACLS, FORM) outpacing chip designer QCOM YTD, tied to AI chip production ramps.
  • Market sentiment favors testing and implantation tools amid memory and logic demand recovery.

Introduction

This comparison examines ACLS, FORM, and QCOM, key players in the semiconductor ecosystem benefiting from AI-driven demand for advanced chips. ACLS and FORM provide critical equipment for chip fabrication and testing, while QCOM designs chips and licensing IP. Traders seeking exposure to semiconductor growth, particularly in memory, logic, and edge AI, will find value in analyzing their relative performance, momentum, and sector positioning amid recent market rallies.

ACLS Overview and Recent Performance

Axcelis Technologies (ACLS) designs, manufactures, and services ion implantation equipment essential for semiconductor fabrication, serving power device, memory, and logic markets. In recent market activity, ACLS shares have surged over 70% YTD and nearly 170% over the past year, reflecting robust demand for high-energy implanters amid AI chip production. Q4 2025 earnings beat expectations with $238 million in revenue and non-GAAP EPS of $1.49, supported by strong customer service and implant bookings. Sentiment has been buoyed by memory market optimism and a pending Veeco merger, though shares experienced pullbacks amid broader sector volatility.

FORM Overview and Recent Performance

FormFactor (FORM) specializes in probe cards, analytical probes, and systems for semiconductor testing across the product lifecycle, with emphasis on DRAM, NAND, and logic devices. Recent weeks have seen explosive gains, with shares up over 160% YTD and 380% annually, propelled by record Q1 2026 revenue of $226 million (up 32% YoY) and non-GAAP EPS of $0.56, exceeding forecasts. Strong DRAM demand and foundry/logic growth drove margins to 49%, while guidance for $240 million in Q2 underscores AI testing tailwinds. Performance reflects heightened investor focus on wafer-level probing for advanced nodes.

QCOM Overview and Recent Performance

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) develops wireless technologies, semiconductors, and IP licensing, spanning handsets, automotive, IoT, and edge AI via Snapdragon platforms. In recent market activity, shares have advanced amid AI optimism, with Q2 2026 revenue at $10.6 billion and EPS of $2.65 beating estimates, alongside a $20 billion buyback. Automotive revenue jumped 38% YoY, offsetting flat handsets. YTD gains trail peers at around 10%, but 1-year returns exceed 30%, supported by diversification into data centers and on-device AI, enhancing long-term sentiment despite cyclical wireless exposure.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from a total of 351 bots, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and ticker sets to navigate current market conditions. These bots target growth sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, leveraged ETFs, and finance, delivering impressive stats such as annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.70. For instance, semiconductor-focused agents have posted +95% annualized gains with high profit-to-drawdown ratios. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI bots trading thousands of tickers, but only the most suitable based on real-time performance earn a spot here. Explore these bots for potential edge in volatile markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ACLS and FORM focus on upstream equipment—ion implantation and probe testing—tied to fab expansions for AI chips, contrasting QCOM’s downstream chip design and QTL (Qualcomm Technology Licensing) royalties. Growth drivers differ: FORM leverages DRAM testing surges, ACLS power/SiC devices, while QCOM diversifies via automotive (38% growth) and edge AI. Recent momentum favors FORM (160%+ YTD) over ACLS (74%) and QCOM (10%), but QCOM’s $177B market cap dwarfs peers’ $4B each, offering liquidity.

Risks include cyclical fab spending for equipment stocks versus QCOM’s handset exposure; all share semiconductor volatility. Valuation sensitivity is high for ACLS and FORM amid elevated P/E ratios post-rallies, while QCOM trades more reasonably with buybacks. Sentiment tilts toward testing/equipment on AI ramps, but QCOM’s scale provides trade-offs in stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors FORM due to superior trend consistency, record earnings momentum, and positioning in AI-driven semiconductor testing demand. With 160%+ YTD gains and raised guidance, it shows higher probability of near-term outperformance versus ACLS’s solid but volatile equipment play and QCOM’s steadier diversification, based on observable catalysts and relative strength.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 17, 2026
Stock price -- (ACLS: $155.18FORM: $126.26QCOM: $201.49)
Brand notoriety: ACLS and FORM are not notable and QCOM is notable
ACLS and FORM are part of the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and QCOM is in the Semiconductors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACLS: 75%, FORM: 145%, QCOM: 128%
Market capitalization -- ACLS: $4.77B, FORM: $9.84B, QCOM: $212.37B
$ACLS [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $4.77B. $FORM’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $ $9.84B. $QCOM [@Semiconductors] has a market capitalization of $ $212.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $ $617.25B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Semiconductors] industry ranges from $ $5.46T to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $ $52.88B. The average market capitalization across the [@Semiconductors] industry is $ $143.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACLS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFORM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and QCOM’s FA Score reflects 4 green FA rating(s).

  • ACLS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FORM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QCOM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the long-term than FORM, which in turn is a better option than ACLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACLS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FORM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and QCOM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FORM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • QCOM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QCOM is a better buy in the short-term than FORM, which in turn is a better option than ACLS.

Price Growth

ACLS (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -4.82% price change this week, while FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was -14.61% , and QCOM (@Semiconductors) price fluctuated -8.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACLS is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

FORM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

QCOM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)

The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QCOM($212B) has a higher market cap than FORM($9.84B) and ACLS($4.77B). FORM has higher P/E ratio than ACLS and QCOM: FORM (145.13) vs ACLS (48.19) and QCOM (21.67). FORM YTD gains are higher at: 126.354 vs. ACLS (93.154) and QCOM (18.552). QCOM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14B vs. ACLS (139M) and FORM (128M). QCOM has more cash in the bank: 9.8B vs. ACLS (367M) and FORM (303M). FORM has less debt than ACLS and QCOM: FORM (31.9M) vs ACLS (42M) and QCOM (15.3B). QCOM has higher revenues than ACLS and FORM: QCOM (44.5B) vs ACLS (845M) and FORM (840M).
ACLSFORMQCOM
Capitalization4.77B9.84B212B
EBITDA139M128M14B
Gain YTD93.154126.35418.552
P/E Ratio48.19145.1321.67
Revenue845M840M44.5B
Total Cash367M303M9.8B
Total Debt42M31.9M15.3B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACLS vs FORM vs QCOM: Fundamental Ratings
ACLS
FORM
QCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
818025
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
582353
SMR RATING
1..100
718026
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36367
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3519
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
315050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QCOM's Valuation (27) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACLS (59) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to ACLS’s and somewhat faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.

FORM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as QCOM (53) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ACLS (58) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that FORM's stock grew similarly to QCOM’s and somewhat faster than ACLS’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's SMR Rating (26) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACLS (71) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FORM (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew somewhat faster than ACLS’s and somewhat faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.

QCOM's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as ACLS (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as FORM (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that QCOM's stock grew similarly to ACLS’s and similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.

ACLS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as FORM (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry, and is in the same range as QCOM (19) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry. This means that ACLS's stock grew similarly to FORM’s and similarly to QCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACLSFORMQCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FORM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SIXG81.28N/A
N/A
DEFIANCE CONNECTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ETF
CSSD25.16-0.05
-0.18%
Cohen & Steers Sh Dur Pref & Inc Act ETF
NAPR58.71-0.19
-0.32%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
NOVZ46.63-0.19
-0.40%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Nov ETF
VCEB62.27-0.32
-0.51%
Vanguard ESG US Corporate Bond ETF

ACLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACLS has been closely correlated with VECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ACLS jumps, then VECO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACLS
1D Price
Change %
ACLS100%
-4.00%
VECO - ACLS
86%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
NXPI - ACLS
71%
Closely correlated
-0.91%
ADI - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
QCOM - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
POWI - ACLS
70%
Closely correlated
+2.19%
More

FORM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FORM
1D Price
Change %
FORM100%
-1.35%
RMBS - FORM
74%
Closely correlated
-2.70%
SLAB - FORM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
ADI - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
-2.18%
ARM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
-8.46%
QCOM - FORM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

QCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QCOM has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QCOM jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QCOM
1D Price
Change %
QCOM100%
+0.70%
LRCX - QCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
KLAC - QCOM
78%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
AMKR - QCOM
76%
Closely correlated
-2.41%
AMAT - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
KLIC - QCOM
74%
Closely correlated
-1.97%
More