APA
Price
$43.39
Change
-$1.00 (-2.25%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
15.2B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CNQ
Price
$51.40
Change
+$0.37 (+0.73%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
105.91B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MGY
Price
$28.14
Change
-$0.08 (-0.28%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.67B
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APA or CNQ or MGY

APA vs CNQ vs MGY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 24, 2026
Stock price -- (APA: $43.39CNQ: $51.40MGY: $28.14)
Brand notoriety: APA and CNQ are notable and MGY is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APA: 105%, CNQ: 49%, MGY: 64%
Market capitalization -- APA: $15.2B, CNQ: $105.91B, MGY: $6.67B
$APA is valued at $15.2B, while CNQ has a market capitalization of $105.91B, and MGY's market capitalization is $6.67B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Production ranges from $162.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Production industry is $10.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCNQ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and MGY’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CNQ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGY is a better buy in the long-term than APA, which in turn is a better option than CNQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CNQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s), and MGY’s TA Score reflects 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CNQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MGY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNQ is a better buy in the short-term than APA and MGY.

Price Growth

APA (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +7.22% price change this week, while CNQ (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +7.15% , and MGY (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated +7.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

APA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

CNQ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

MGY is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.60% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CNQ($106B) has a higher market cap than APA($15.2B) and MGY($6.67B). CNQ and MGY has higher P/E ratio than APA: CNQ (12.63) and MGY (12.29) vs APA (9.15). APA YTD gains are higher at: 81.546 vs. CNQ (51.846) and MGY (31.036). CNQ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.5B vs. APA (5.32B) and MGY (1.02B). APA has more cash in the bank: 154M vs. CNQ (113M) and MGY (96.7M). MGY has less debt than APA and CNQ: MGY (413M) vs APA (4.54B) and CNQ (17.3B). CNQ has higher revenues than APA and MGY: CNQ (44.5B) vs APA (8.61B) and MGY (1.48B).
APACNQMGY
Capitalization15.2B106B6.67B
EBITDA5.32B17.5B1.02B
Gain YTD81.54651.84631.036
P/E Ratio9.1512.6312.29
Revenue8.61B44.5B1.48B
Total Cash154M113M96.7M
Total Debt4.54B17.3B413M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APA vs CNQ vs MGY: Fundamental Ratings
APA
CNQ
MGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
501742
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
542033
SMR RATING
1..100
375345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
242847
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
495050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APA's Valuation (39) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (47) and is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (76). This means that APA's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

CNQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (33) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APA (54). This means that CNQ's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and somewhat faster than APA’s over the last 12 months.

APA's SMR Rating (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as MGY (45) and is in the same range as CNQ (53). This means that APA's stock grew similarly to MGY’s and similarly to CNQ’s over the last 12 months.

APA's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CNQ (41) and is somewhat better than the same rating for MGY (48). This means that APA's stock grew somewhat faster than CNQ’s and somewhat faster than MGY’s over the last 12 months.

APA's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as CNQ (28) and is in the same range as MGY (47). This means that APA's stock grew similarly to CNQ’s and similarly to MGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APACNQMGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CNQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DINO97.324.60
+4.96%
HF Sinclair Corp
LUNR18.320.39
+2.18%
Intuitive Machines
CEPF10.430.08
+0.77%
Cantor Equity Partners IV Inc.
MHH7.500.04
+0.54%
Mastech Digital
CDTG1.18-0.65
-35.52%
CDT Environmental Technology Investment Holdings Limited

APA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APA has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APA jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APA
1D Price
Change %
APA100%
-2.25%
OVV - APA
81%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
DVN - APA
81%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
CHRD - APA
80%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
MGY - APA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
COP - APA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.01%
More