APA
Price
$37.63
Change
+$1.10 (+3.01%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
13.18B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EOG
Price
$134.74
Change
-$1.46 (-1.07%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
70.68B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PR
Price
$20.15
Change
-$0.13 (-0.64%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APA or EOG or PR

APA vs EOG vs PR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? APA Corporation (APA) vs. EOG Resources (EOG) vs. Permian Resources Corporation (PR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • APA Corporation, EOG Resources, and Permian Resources Corporation operate as upstream energy producers focused on oil and natural gas, with varying geographic exposure and operational scales.
  • In recent market activity, EOG Resources has demonstrated stronger price levels near $148.69 alongside earnings beats in Q1 2026, while APA Corporation traded around $37.35 and Permian Resources Corporation near $21.31.
  • Valuation metrics show differences in price-to-earnings ratios, with APA Corporation at approximately 8.7 and EOG Resources around 14.5-14.6, reflecting distinct market perceptions of growth and stability.
  • Dividend policies vary, with EOG Resources maintaining a higher indicated annual rate and Permian Resources Corporation offering a quarterly base dividend of $0.16 per share.
  • Analyst sentiment remains constructive across the group, with multiple buy ratings noted for EOG Resources and Permian Resources Corporation in recent weeks.
  • Sector exposure centers on commodity price sensitivity, where operational efficiency and free cash flow generation differentiate relative positioning.

Introduction

This comparison examines APA Corporation (APA), EOG Resources (EOG), and Permian Resources Corporation (PR), three companies in the upstream oil and natural gas sector. The analysis highlights differences in business models, recent stock behavior, and market positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating energy equities. Participants in the energy sector, including those monitoring commodity cycles or seeking exposure to U.S. production assets, may find the relative performance and operational contrasts informative for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions.

APA Overview and Recent Performance

APA Corporation engages in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas across multiple basins, including international operations. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in a range near $34 to $37.89, closing around $37.35 amid broader energy market fluctuations. Performance has reflected sensitivity to commodity prices and operational updates, with a market capitalization near $13.6 billion and a trailing price-to-earnings ratio of approximately 8.7. Dividend yield stands near 2.68 percent, providing income support during periods of price volatility. Sentiment has been influenced by general sector dynamics rather than isolated company-specific catalysts in the latest reporting period.

EOG Overview and Recent Performance

EOG Resources focuses on exploration and production with an emphasis on premium assets and operational efficiency, primarily in U.S. shale plays. Recent market activity showed the stock advancing to levels near $148.69 following Q1 2026 results that exceeded estimates with adjusted earnings per share of $3.41. The company reported strong free cash flow generation and continued share repurchases alongside dividend declarations. Valuation metrics include a trailing price-to-earnings ratio around 14.5-14.6, with analyst commentary noting consistent outperformance in price realizations compared to peers. Market positioning has benefited from demonstrated execution on volume guidance and capital discipline in recent periods.

PR Overview and Recent Performance

Permian Resources Corporation concentrates on oil and natural gas development within the Permian Basin, leveraging scale in a high-productivity region. In recent weeks, shares have moved around the $20 to $21.50 range, closing near $21.31 with positive intraday momentum. The company has highlighted record free cash flow outlooks and maintained a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Multiple analyst firms have issued buy ratings with price targets in the mid-$20s, citing operational strengths and conservative leverage. Performance reflects basin-specific advantages amid fluctuating energy prices, with volume growth and cost management supporting relative stability.

Trending AI Robots

Trending AI Robots showcases a curated selection from Tickeron’s extensive library of hundreds of AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, including favorable performance statistics, risk-adjusted metrics, and strategy robustness, earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, with historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown ranges varying by model to suit different risk tolerances. This resource allows users to explore data-driven options tailored to current environments. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and configurations.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models differ in scope: APA Corporation maintains broader geographic diversification, EOG Resources prioritizes high-margin U.S. assets with superior realizations, and Permian Resources Corporation derives advantages from concentrated Permian Basin exposure. Growth drivers include drilling efficiency for all three, though EOG Resources has posted stronger recent earnings beats and free cash flow metrics. Momentum in recent weeks favored EOG Resources at higher absolute price levels, while PR showed analyst-supported upside potential and APA traded at lower valuation multiples. Risk factors center on commodity price volatility and operational execution, with EOG Resources exhibiting lower relative leverage in some peer comparisons. Valuation sensitivity appears higher for APA Corporation given its lower price-to-earnings ratio, potentially offering more cushion in downturns but less premium for growth. Market sentiment reflects broad energy sector caution offset by individual operational positives, particularly for EOG Resources and Permian Resources Corporation.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency, free cash flow strength, and recent relative price stability, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign higher probabilistic weighting to EOG Resources in the current environment. Its demonstrated beat on Q1 2026 estimates and premium asset positioning provide a measurable edge in trend consistency and catalyst support compared with the valuation discount at APA Corporation or the basin-specific focus at Permian Resources Corporation. Outcomes remain contingent on commodity trends and execution metrics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (APA: $37.63EOG: $134.74PR: $20.15)
Brand notoriety: APA and EOG are notable and PR is not notable
The three companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APA: 70%, EOG: 92%, PR: 74%
Market capitalization -- APA: $13.18B, EOG: $70.68B, PR: $16.88B
$APA is valued at $13.18B, while EOG has a market capitalization of $70.68B, and PR's market capitalization is $16.88B. The market cap for tickers in this @Oil & Gas Production ranges from $141.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Oil & Gas Production industry is $9.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEOG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PR’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EOG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APA is a better buy in the long-term than EOG, which in turn is a better option than PR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APA’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EOG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and PR’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APA’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • EOG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APA is a better buy in the short-term than EOG and PR.

Price Growth

APA (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.83% price change this week, while EOG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.38% , and PR (@Oil & Gas Production) price fluctuated -5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -1.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

APA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

EOG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PR is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-1.94% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EOG($70.7B) has a higher market cap than PR($16.9B) and APA($13.2B). PR has higher P/E ratio than EOG and APA: PR (13.00) vs EOG (10.49) and APA (7.94). APA YTD gains are higher at: 57.446 vs. PR (46.062) and EOG (31.509). EOG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9B vs. APA (5.32B) and PR (3.31B). EOG has more cash in the bank: 5.27B vs. APA (154M) and PR (138K). PR has less debt than APA and EOG: PR (3.69B) vs APA (4.54B) and EOG (8.31B). EOG has higher revenues than APA and PR: EOG (23.5B) vs APA (8.61B) and PR (5.08B).
APAEOGPR
Capitalization13.2B70.7B16.9B
EBITDA5.32B11.9B3.31B
Gain YTD57.44631.50946.062
P/E Ratio7.9410.4913.00
Revenue8.61B23.5B5.08B
Total Cash154M5.27B138K
Total Debt4.54B8.31B3.69B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APA vs EOG vs PR: Fundamental Ratings
APA
EOG
PR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
507778
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
642820
SMR RATING
1..100
374983
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
355417
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APA's Valuation (33) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EOG (54) and is in the same range as PR (58). This means that APA's stock grew similarly to EOG’s and similarly to PR’s over the last 12 months.

PR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EOG (28) and is somewhat better than the same rating for APA (64). This means that PR's stock grew similarly to EOG’s and somewhat faster than APA’s over the last 12 months.

APA's SMR Rating (37) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as EOG (49) and is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (83). This means that APA's stock grew similarly to EOG’s and somewhat faster than PR’s over the last 12 months.

APA's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PR (44) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EOG (48). This means that APA's stock grew somewhat faster than PR’s and somewhat faster than EOG’s over the last 12 months.

PR's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as APA (35) and is somewhat better than the same rating for EOG (54). This means that PR's stock grew similarly to APA’s and somewhat faster than EOG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APAEOGPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EOG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMAB31.251.42
+4.76%
Genmab A/S ADS
CAPS0.280.01
+3.33%
Capstone Holding Corp
MLR54.540.13
+0.24%
Miller Industries
AGPU8.400.02
+0.24%
Axe Compute Inc.
DGII81.70-1.31
-1.58%
Digi International

APA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APA has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APA jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APA
1D Price
Change %
APA100%
+3.01%
OVV - APA
81%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
CHRD - APA
80%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
MUR - APA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
MGY - APA
79%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
DVN - APA
79%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
More

EOG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EOG has been closely correlated with COP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EOG jumps, then COP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EOG
1D Price
Change %
EOG100%
-1.07%
COP - EOG
85%
Closely correlated
+0.73%
DVN - EOG
84%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
CHRD - EOG
83%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
OVV - EOG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
MTDR - EOG
79%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More

PR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PR has been closely correlated with OVV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PR jumps, then OVV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PR
1D Price
Change %
PR100%
-0.64%
OVV - PR
87%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
CHRD - PR
85%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
FANG - PR
83%
Closely correlated
-0.84%
DVN - PR
82%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
MTDR - PR
82%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
More