Advertisement
ASAN or CRM or TEAM
ASAN | CRM | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 62 | 81 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 17 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 40 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (17) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASAN (62) in the null industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew somewhat faster than ASAN’s and significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ASAN (100) in the null industry, and is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM's stock grew similarly to ASAN’s and similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (92) in the Information Technology Services industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ASAN (98) in the null industry. This means that CRM's stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s and somewhat faster than ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as ASAN (37) in the null industry, and is in the same range as CRM (40) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM's stock grew similarly to ASAN’s and similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (86) in the Packaged Software industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for ASAN (100) in the null industry. This means that TEAM's stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s and significantly faster than ASAN’s over the last 12 months.
| ASAN | CRM | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 67% | 12 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASAN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and TEAM’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASAN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASAN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and TEAM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASAN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ASAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а +16.82% price change this week, while CRM (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.37% , and TEAM (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +10.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASAN is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+0.26% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
ASAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASAN has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ASAN jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ASAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASAN | 100% | +2.03% | ||
| WDAY - ASAN | 76% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FRSH - ASAN | 75% Closely correlated | +2.05% | ||
| HUBS - ASAN | 74% Closely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| TEAM - ASAN | 72% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| NOW - ASAN | 71% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
More | ||||