Regional and super-regional banks are a useful lens for assessing how scale, geography, and business mix shape market positioning in today's rate environment. This stock comparison examines three publicly traded lenders of very different sizes: Associated Banc-Corp (ASB), Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT), and U.S. Bancorp (USB). Investors weighing relative performance, growth drivers, and risk tolerance may find the contrast instructive—from USB's national payments and capital-markets platform to the regional, acquisition-driven growth stories of ASB and FULT.
Associated Banc-Corp is the largest bank holding company based in Wisconsin, operating roughly 200 banking locations across the Midwest with total assets near $52 billion. The company has been pivoting toward higher-yielding commercial and industrial (C&I) lending while reducing lower-yielding residential balances. In recent quarters, ASB has reported rising net interest income (NII) and a higher net interest margin, alongside an improving efficiency ratio. Its pending integration of American National Corporation has meaningfully raised its loan and deposit growth outlook. The stock has delivered a strong multi-year total return, though near-term sentiment has cooled modestly around recent prime rate changes. A heavier commercial real estate tilt remains a key watch item for credit quality.
Fulton Financial Corporation is a Pennsylvania-based bank holding company serving the Mid-Atlantic through Fulton Bank, with roughly $35 billion in assets and more than 200 financial centers. FULT has reported record operating earnings in recent periods, supported by higher net interest income and the completed merger of Blue Foundry Bank. Its "Fulton First" initiative targets operational simplification and reinvestment for growth. The stock has posted strong year-to-date and multi-year returns, and analysts have raised price targets in recent weeks. CET1 capital of about 12.1% is among the strongest of the group. Potential headwinds include a more modest near-term loan growth outlook and sensitivity to credit costs.
U.S. Bancorp is one of the largest banks in the country, with roughly $700 billion in assets and a presence across 26 states. USB pairs traditional lending and deposits with a substantial payments, merchant-processing, and wealth-management franchise, giving it a more diversified revenue mix than most regional peers. Recent developments include the completed acquisition of institutional brokerage BTIG and the launch of a proprietary U.S. dollar-backed stablecoin pilot. The bank has lifted its quarterly dividend and maintains a CET1 ratio near 10.8%. Fee income now accounts for a large share of revenue, reducing reliance on net interest income. Its scale brings lower relative credit risk, though growth rates tend to trail smaller, acquisition-driven peers.
For investors seeking a more systematic approach to relative performance, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of AI-driven trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only a select group with the strongest current performance and the best fit for prevailing market conditions earns a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the specific tickers they trade—so no single approach suits every investor. Exploring the Trending AI Robots list can help traders identify strategies aligned with their own objectives and risk tolerance.
The three companies occupy distinct positions on the banking spectrum. USB offers scale, diversification, and a national payments franchise, with fee income cushioning earnings from rate swings—but its larger base means slower percentage growth. ASB and FULT are acquisition-driven regionals with higher growth potential but concentrated geographic and credit exposure. On valuation, FULT trades at a lower price-to-earnings multiple than USB, while ASB sits between them on efficiency and margin trends. Dividend yield favors USB, while FULT and ASB offer faster recent earnings momentum. Risk profiles differ too: USB's commercial real estate exposure is modest relative to its size, whereas ASB and FULT carry proportionally larger concentrations in regional commercial lending.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings momentum, capital strength, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely favor FULT in the current environment. Its record operating earnings, strong CET1 ratio, completed acquisition integration, and sustained positive momentum offer a combination of stability and growth catalysts. ASB presents a credible alternative given its margin expansion and acquisition-driven growth, while USB remains the most diversified and defensive choice. The AI's preference should be read as a probabilistic assessment of relative positioning rather than a definitive outcome.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ASB | FULT | USB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 84 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 25 Undervalued | 28 Undervalued | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 36 | 70 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 11 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 55 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 37 | 37 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASB's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (28) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as USB (39) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ASB's stock grew similarly to FULT’s and similarly to USB’s over the last 12 months.
ASB's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FULT (36) in the Regional Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for USB (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that ASB's stock grew similarly to FULT’s and somewhat faster than USB’s over the last 12 months.
USB's SMR Rating (4) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as ASB (11) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as FULT (11) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that USB's stock grew similarly to ASB’s and similarly to FULT’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (56) in the Major Banks industry, and is in the same range as ASB (56) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FULT's stock grew similarly to USB’s and similarly to ASB’s over the last 12 months.
FULT's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as USB (37) in the Major Banks industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for ASB (98) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FULT's stock grew similarly to USB’s and somewhat faster than ASB’s over the last 12 months.
| ASB | FULT | USB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 59% | 8 days ago 61% | 29 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 59% | 11 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 64% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FULT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s), and USB’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FULT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and USB’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.14% price change this week, while FULT (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.42% , and USB (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated -0.58% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.68%.
ASB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
FULT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.
USB is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VRP | 23.76 | 0.06 | +0.25% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) | |||
| BFRZ | 27.40 | -0.02 | -0.07% |
| Innovator Equity Managed 100 Buffer ETF | |||
| MYHD | 24.18 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| State Street My2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHD) | |||
| OVL | 57.42 | -0.24 | -0.42% |
| Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) | |||
| TCHI | 21.10 | -0.64 | -2.96% |
| iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF (TCHI) | |||