Advertisement
BAP or BSAC or IFS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) vs. Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) vs. Intercorp Financial Services (IFS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Credicorp (BAP) is the largest and most diversified of the three, combining universal banking, microfinance, insurance, and a fast-growing digital ecosystem anchored by its Yape wallet.
- Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) stands out for efficiency and capital returns, with a best-in-class efficiency ratio and a dividend yield above 4%.
- Intercorp Financial Services (IFS) is the smallest by market capitalization but delivered record earnings and the lowest cost of risk in years, supported by banking, insurance, and wealth management.
- Both BAP and IFS are tied to Peru's macro cycle, while BSAC offers exposure to Chile and a more rate-sensitive balance sheet.
- Relative performance diverges meaningfully: BAP has shown the strongest momentum, while BSAC and IFS trade at lower valuation multiples with more mixed analyst sentiment.
Introduction
Investors evaluating Latin American financials often face a choice between scale, efficiency, and valuation. This stock comparison examines three regional banks and financial groups — Credicorp Ltd. (BAP), Banco Santander Chile (BSAC), and Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) — that share a presence in the Andean region yet occupy very different positions in the market. Two are Peru-centric financial groups, while the third is Chile's largest private bank. Understanding how their business models, growth drivers, and risk profiles compare can help traders and investors weigh relative performance and market positioning across distinct, commodity-sensitive Latin American economies.
BAP Overview and Recent Performance
Credicorp Ltd. (BAP) is Peru's largest financial holding company, operating universal banking (Banco de Crédito del Perú, or BCP), microfinance (Mibanco), insurance and pensions (Grupo Pacifico), and investment management. Its digital wallet, Yape, has become a defining growth driver, surpassing 15 million monthly active users and contributing a growing share of group fee income. In recent quarters, Credicorp has reported record net income and a return on equity (ROE) above 20%, supported by loan growth, improved asset quality, and a healthy net interest margin (NIM). Analysts have responded favorably, with at least one major institution upgrading the stock and raising price targets. In recent market activity, BAP shares have continued a strong upward trajectory over the trailing year, though the stock has cooled modestly from recent highs as investors weigh valuation after a prolonged run. Peru's political transition, weather-related risks, and the scaling of Yape's higher-yield lending remain the key variables shaping sentiment.
BSAC Overview and Recent Performance
Banco Santander Chile (BSAC) is the largest bank in Chile and a subsidiary of Spain's Banco Santander. It operates across retail banking, middle-market lending, and corporate and investment banking, with a strong franchise in current accounts and a growing digital customer base of close to five million clients. In recent quarters, BSAC has delivered a return on average equity (ROAE) in the low-to-mid 20% range and a sector-leading efficiency ratio near 32%, reflecting disciplined cost control following its core-banking cloud migration. The bank maintains a solid CET1 (Common Equity Tier 1) capital ratio and has distributed a substantial share of profits as dividends, supporting a yield above 4%. In recent market activity, BSAC shares have been more range-bound and modestly weaker over recent weeks, as lower inflation has compressed its inflation-linked margin. Analyst views remain divided, with sell-side targets spanning a wide range and reflecting differing expectations for Chile's rate environment and economic growth.
IFS Overview and Recent Performance
Intercorp Financial Services Inc. (IFS) is a Peru-based financial group operating banking (Interbank), insurance (Interseguro), and wealth management (Inteligo). In recent quarters, IFS has reported record net income with an ROE above 19%, driven by lower credit costs, strong foreign-exchange and investment results, and double-digit growth in insurance and wealth management. Its cost of risk fell to roughly 1.4%, a multi-year low, while its digital payments platform, Plin, has expanded user engagement. The group has also deepened its consumer-finance ecosystem through a partnership with retailer InRetail to acquire a consumer-finance business, adding scale in payments and consumer credit. In recent market activity, IFS shares have rallied strongly from earlier levels, leading some analysts to reassess the risk-reward and move to a more neutral stance. Peru's political cycle, potential El Niño weather impacts, and the expected normalization of credit costs are the principal factors investors are monitoring.
Trending AI Robots
For traders who want to apply a data-driven, systematic lens to opportunities like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively monitor thousands of different tickers, but only a subset earns a place in the Trending section — those judged most suitable for current market conditions. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance record, statistics, and set of tickers it trades, so no two are alike. Browsing the section can help investors compare automated approaches alongside their own fundamental research. To explore which bots are currently aligned with prevailing market conditions, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The three names diverge sharply on business model and geographic exposure. BAP is the most diversified, blending banking with microfinance, insurance, and wealth management, all dominated by a single large digital asset in Yape. IFS offers a similar Peru-focused mix but at a smaller scale, with banking, insurance, and wealth management each contributing. BSAC, by contrast, is a pure-play Chilean bank whose earnings are more directly tied to inflation-linked assets and the local rate cycle.
On momentum, BAP has been the clear leader over the trailing year, benefiting from record earnings and a favorable copper and gold price backdrop. IFS has also recovered strongly but now faces more cautious analyst positioning after its run. BSAC has lagged in relative performance recently, pressured by disinflation and a wide dispersion in analyst opinions. On valuation, both IFS and BSAC trade at lower earnings multiples than BAP, though BAP's premium reflects its faster digital monetization and earnings momentum. Risk factors also differ: BAP and IFS carry concentrated Peru political and weather exposure, while BSAC is sensitive to Chilean inflation, copper-linked activity, and rate policy. Trade-offs center on whether investors prefer diversified growth (BAP), capital efficiency and income (BSAC), or a lower-multiple turnaround with expanding consumer finance (IFS).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would most likely favor BAP among the three. Credicorp has demonstrated the most persistent uptrend, the strongest earnings trajectory, and a distinctive digital growth catalyst in Yape, alongside improving analyst sentiment. That said, the AI would likely note that BAP's extended valuation and Peru-specific risks temper conviction. IFS presents a credible alternative given its lower multiple and record profitability, while BSAC offers income and efficiency but currently lacks the same directional momentum. The assessment is probabilistic and reflects current market conditions rather than a definitive forecast, and it can shift as new earnings, macro data, and price trends emerge.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
BAP in upward trend: 10-day moving average broke above 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026
The 10-day moving average for BAP crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 11 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +1.65% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BAP advanced for three days, in 233 of 336 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
BAP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 257 of 360 cases where BAP Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 71%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 33 of 57 cases where BAP's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on BAP as a result. In 46 of 81 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for BAP turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 24 of the 45 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 53%.
BAP moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BAP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 55, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 19 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.773) is normal, around the industry mean (1.268). P/E Ratio (3.996) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.372). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.040) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). BAP's Dividend Yield (0.156) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.035). P/S Ratio (4.088) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. BAP’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
BSAC saw its Stochastic Oscillator leaves the overbought zone
The Stochastic Oscillator for BSAC moved out of overbought territory on October 22, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock and investors may want to consider selling or taking a defensive position. A.I.dvisor looked at 70 similar instances where the indicator exited the overbought zone. In 41 of the 70 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 59%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
BSAC moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for BSAC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BSAC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
The Aroon Indicator for BSAC entered a downward trend on October 16, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where BSAC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 17 of 19 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BSAC as a result. In 56 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BSAC just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where BSAC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 38 of 51 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 75%.
Following a +1.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BSAC advanced for three days, in 242 of 351 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
BSAC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 55, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 15 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: BSAC's P/B Ratio (0.003) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.268). P/E Ratio (0.013) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.372). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (2.596) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). BSAC's Dividend Yield (0.164) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.035). P/S Ratio (5.236) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BSAC’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
IFS in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026
IFS may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 23 of 28 cases where IFS's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +2.94% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IFS advanced for three days, in 220 of 313 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 30 of 59 cases where IFS's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 51%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IFS as a result. In 44 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 48%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IFS turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 40 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 21 of the 40 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 52%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IFS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 58%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 55, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 13 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: IFS's P/B Ratio (0.443) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.268). P/E Ratio (2.734) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.372). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.030) is also within normal values, averaging (1.190). IFS's Dividend Yield (0.139) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.035). P/S Ratio (2.936) is also within normal values, averaging (3.738).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. IFS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
BAP | BSAC | IFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 77 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 4 | 1 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 52 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 97 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IFS's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as BSAC (15) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as BAP (19) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS's stock grew similarly to BSAC’s and similarly to BAP’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (2) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as IFS (11) in the null industry. This means that BSAC's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
BSAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BAP (4) in the Regional Banks industry, and is in the same range as IFS (7) in the null industry. This means that BSAC's stock grew similarly to BAP’s and similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (47) in the null industry, and is in the same range as BSAC (52) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to IFS’s and similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.
BAP's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (94) in the null industry, and is in the same range as BSAC (97) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BAP's stock grew similarly to IFS’s and similarly to BSAC’s over the last 12 months.
| BAP | BSAC | IFS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 9 days ago 69% | 15 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while BSAC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and IFS’s FA Score reflects 3 green FA rating(s).
- BAP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- BSAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BSAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and IFS’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- BSAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.47% price change this week, while BSAC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.62% , and IFS (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated -4.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAP is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
BSAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
IFS is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (+2.20% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
BAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAP has been closely correlated with IFS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAP jumps, then IFS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAP | 100% | -4.46% | ||
| IFS - BAP | 76% Closely correlated | -3.30% | ||
| BSAC - BAP | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.09% | ||
| BCH - BAP | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| CIB - BAP | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| INTR - BAP | 49% Loosely correlated | -4.55% | ||
More | ||||
IFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been closely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFS | 100% | -3.30% | ||
| BAP - IFS | 76% Closely correlated | -4.46% | ||
| BSAC - IFS | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.09% | ||
| BCH - IFS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| CIB - IFS | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| BSBR - IFS | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.00% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GMUB | 49.87 | 0.34 | +0.69% |
| Goldman Sachs Municipal Income ETF (GMUB) | |||
| SPTS | 28.78 | 0.08 | +0.28% |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio Short Term Treasury ETF (SPTS) | |||
| NBET | 41.18 | -0.34 | -0.83% |
| Neuberger Energy Transition & Infrastructure ETF (NBET) | |||
| SNDU | 13.00 | -2.67 | -17.04% |
| T-REX 2X Long SNDK Daily Target ETF (SNDU) | |||
| AXTU | 18.57 | -6.53 | -26.03% |
| T-REX 2X Long AXTI Daily Target ETF (AXTU) | |||