BSBR
Price
$5.68
Change
+$0.01 (+0.18%)
Updated
Aug 3, 02:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.07B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IFS
Price
$58.31
Change
-$0.20 (-0.34%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.44B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BSBR vs IFS

BSBR vs IFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BSBR vs. IFS commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSBR is a StrongBuy and IFS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BSBR: $5.67 vs. IFS: $58.31)
Brand notoriety: BSBR and IFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BSBR: 626% vs. IFS: 119%
Market capitalization -- BSBR: $21.07B vs. IFS: $6.44B
BSBR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $21.07B. IFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BSBR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFS’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BSBR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, IFS is a better buy in the long-term than BSBR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BSBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BSBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BSBR and IFS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BSBR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.22% price change this week, while IFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BSBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

IFS is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BSBR($21.1B) has a higher market cap than IFS($6.44B). BSBR has higher P/E ratio than IFS: BSBR (16.42) vs IFS (10.80). IFS YTD gains are higher at: 43.257 vs. BSBR (1.784). IFS has less debt than BSBR: IFS (12.3B) vs BSBR (31.7B). BSBR has higher revenues than IFS: BSBR (49.5B) vs IFS (7.13B).
BSBRIFSBSBR / IFS
Capitalization21.1B6.44B328%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.78443.2574%
P/E Ratio16.4210.80152%
Revenue49.5B7.13B694%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt31.7B12.3B258%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BSBR vs IFS: Fundamental Ratings
BSBR
IFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2894
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
849
SMR RATING
1..100
310
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4155
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BSBR's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (29) in the null industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSBR (84) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BSBR’s over the last 12 months.

BSBR's SMR Rating (3) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (10) in the null industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

IFS's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as BSBR (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that IFS’s stock grew similarly to BSBR’s over the last 12 months.

BSBR's P/E Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as IFS (55) in the null industry. This means that BSBR’s stock grew similarly to IFS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BSBRIFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BSBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NKN.X0.0054790.000067
+1.24%
NKN cryptocurrency
SUSHI.X0.151243-0.000365
-0.24%
SushiSwap cryptocurrency
APT.X0.551508-0.004392
-0.79%
Aptos cryptocurrency
FLUX.X0.038626-0.000370
-0.95%
Flux cryptocurrency
OM.X0.006719-0.055648
-89.23%
MANTRA (old) cryptocurrency

IFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFS has been closely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IFS jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFS
1D Price
Change %
IFS100%
-0.34%
BAP - IFS
76%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
BSAC - IFS
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.31%
BCH - IFS
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
CIB - IFS
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
BSBR - IFS
45%
Loosely correlated
+12.28%
More