It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBCH’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and NU’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BCH’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and NU’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBD (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.91% price change this week, while BCH (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.80% , and NU (@Regional Banks) price fluctuated +5.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.59%.
BBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
BCH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
NU is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
| BBD | BCH | NU | |
| Capitalization | 32.5B | 20.8B | 73.1B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Gain YTD | 0.407 | 26.804 | -9.558 |
| P/E Ratio | 7.63 | 16.33 | 20.62 |
| Revenue | 121B | 3.11T | 11.9B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 1.21B |
| Total Debt | N/A | 13.49T | 1.92B |
BBD | BCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 1 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 3 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBD's Valuation (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBD’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBD (92) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew significantly faster than BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (3) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBD (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to BBD’s over the last 12 months.
BCH's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBD (62) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBD’s over the last 12 months.
| BBD | BCH | NU | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 52% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 2 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 2 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 14 days ago 54% | 8 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% | 1 day ago 76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BCH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCH | 100% | -0.91% | ||
| BSAC - BCH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| BBD - BCH | 62% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| INTR - BCH | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| DB - BCH | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.61% | ||
| BSBR - BCH | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||