Advertisement
BRZE or CRM or HUBS
CRM | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (17) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (73) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (76) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (59) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's P/E Growth Rating (86) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as HUBS (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| BRZE | CRM | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 6 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% | 1 day ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% | 1 day ago 69% | 6 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 77% | 7 days ago 67% | 1 day ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BRZE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and HUBS’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- BRZE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BRZE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and HUBS’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BRZE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BRZE (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.83% price change this week, while CRM (@Packaged Software) price change was +5.79% , and HUBS (@Packaged Software) price fluctuated +1.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
BRZE is expected to report earnings on Dec 15, 2026.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-1.85% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDFJ | 20.23 | 0.03 | +0.15% |
| Innovator Equity Dual Directional 15 Buffer ETF - January (DDFJ) | |||
| RSP | 213.30 | 0.11 | +0.05% |
| Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) | |||
| QAI | 36.08 | N/A | N/A |
| NYLIM Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) | |||
| RAAR | 51.72 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| Reckoner Yield Enhanced AAA Clo Reinvesting ETF | |||
| BCTK | 30.86 | -0.23 | -0.72% |
| Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) | |||
BRZE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRZE has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BRZE jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BRZE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRZE | 100% | -0.45% | ||
| HUBS - BRZE | 67% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| CRM - BRZE | 66% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| FRSH - BRZE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| TTAN - BRZE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| ASAN - BRZE | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
CRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 76% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| ADBE - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
HUBS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HUBS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUBS | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| CRM - HUBS | 76% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| ASAN - HUBS | 74% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| TEAM - HUBS | 73% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| NOW - HUBS | 72% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| DOCU - HUBS | 70% Closely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||