These three exchange-traded funds attract attention from investors seeking amplified exposure to technology and innovation-driven growth. BULZ, TECL, and TQQQ do not track identical benchmarks; instead, they represent distinct leveraged approaches to overlapping yet differentiated segments of the equity market. BULZ emphasizes a curated FANG-plus-innovation basket, TECL targets the broad technology sector, and TQQQ delivers leveraged access to the Nasdaq-100. This comparison highlights how structural choices in indexes, holdings, costs, and product types influence risk profiles and positioning within the current technology-centric market environment.
BULZ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. The index comprises 15 large-capitalization U.S. technology and innovation-focused equities, including eight core components such as Apple, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla, plus seven additional high-liquidity names from relevant FactSet industries. The product is structured as an exchange-traded note issued by Bank of Montreal, which introduces issuer credit risk distinct from traditional ETF structures. It maintains approximately 15 holdings with equal or near-equal weighting emphasis. Sector allocations typically show technology around 62%, communication services near 25%, and consumer cyclical approximately 13%. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. The index rebalances monthly and reconstitutes quarterly to maintain exposure to leading tech innovators.
TECL aims to deliver daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the Technology Select Sector Index. This index tracks U.S. large-cap technology companies and serves as the basis for a market-capitalization-weighted portfolio. The fund employs swaps and other derivatives rather than direct equity ownership, resulting in roughly 70 to 100 effective holdings. Top positions frequently include NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, and Micron Technology. Sector exposure concentrates almost entirely in technology at approximately 99%, with minimal allocation elsewhere. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. As an open-end ETF, it resets leverage daily and provides a focused, sector-specific leveraged vehicle without the credit risk associated with ETNs.
TQQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The underlying index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, weighted by modified market capitalization. The fund utilizes derivatives such as swaps to achieve leverage, resulting in exposure equivalent to approximately 100 holdings. Prominent positions typically feature NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Broadcom. Sector breakdowns generally allocate technology around 54%, communication services near 16%, consumer cyclical about 12%, with smaller weights in consumer defensive and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.82%, the lowest among the three. TQQQ operates as an open-end ETF with daily leverage reset and offers the broadest diversification among the compared products.
The technology sector continues to dominate investor focus amid ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. Major holdings across these ETFs benefit from robust earnings growth in these areas, supported by capital expenditures from hyperscalers and enterprise adoption. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate trajectories, inflation trends, and supply-chain stability, while geopolitical factors influence semiconductor trade and global technology supply. Regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms and antitrust considerations represent ongoing risks. Capital flows into growth-oriented equities have remained resilient in recent market cycles, though sector concentration elevates sensitivity to valuation adjustments and shifts in risk appetite.
In recent weeks and months, performance differentials among the three have stemmed primarily from variations in index composition and concentration levels. TQQQ’s broader Nasdaq-100 exposure has provided relatively more stable trend consistency compared to the narrower technology-sector focus of TECL or the thematic FANG-innovation tilt of BULZ. TECL’s near-100% technology weighting amplifies sensitivity to semiconductor and software leaders, contributing to higher volatility during sector-specific rotations. BULZ’s smaller number of holdings and equal-weight elements introduce distinct concentration dynamics and potential for outsized moves tied to its specific basket. All three exhibit elevated drawdown potential due to daily 3x leverage reset, with differences arising from underlying index breadth and sector tilts rather than short-term price fluctuations alone.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged products or sector themes may find the platform useful for refining research.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to TQQQ. Its lowest expense ratio, broadest holdings count of approximately 100, and diversified Nasdaq-100 exposure provide a comparatively balanced risk-adjusted profile relative to TECL’s sector concentration and BULZ’s narrower thematic basket with added ETN credit considerations. Momentum stability and cost efficiency further support this positioning in a technology-driven environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Disclaimers and Limitations| BULZ | TECL | TQQQ | |
| Gain YTD | 43.787 | 60.692 | 31.608 |
| Net Assets | 3.45B | 5.96B | 34.8B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.87 | 0.82 |
| Turnover | N/A | 94.00 | 25.00 |
| Yield | 0.00 | 3.40 | 0.37 |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 17 years | 16 years |
| BULZ | TECL | TQQQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HWSM | 29.54 | N/A | N/A |
| Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd | |||
| EVSD | 50.85 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF | |||
| IRTR | 31.57 | -0.17 | -0.54% |
| iShares LifePath Retirement ETF | |||
| DFEV | 40.84 | -0.57 | -1.38% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | |||
| YMAG | 11.65 | -0.24 | -2.01% |
| YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fd Of Opt IncETFs | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECL has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TECL jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TECL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECL | 100% | -7.02% | ||
| NVDA - TECL | 73% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| LRCX - TECL | 71% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| AVGO - TECL | 68% Closely correlated | -5.12% | ||
| AMAT - TECL | 68% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| MU - TECL | 67% Closely correlated | -4.70% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TQQQ | 100% | -6.04% | ||
| LRCX - TQQQ | 71% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NVDA - TQQQ | 69% Closely correlated | -3.73% | ||
| KLAC - TQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| AMAT - TQQQ | 67% Closely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| ASML - TQQQ | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||