BULZ
Price
$37.32
Change
-$3.25 (-8.01%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
3.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TECL
Price
$188.60
Change
-$14.24 (-7.02%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
5.96B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TQQQ
Price
$69.27
Change
-$4.45 (-6.04%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Net Assets
34.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BULZ or TECL or TQQQ

Header iconBULZ vs TECL vs TQQQ Comparison
Open Charts BULZ vs TECL vs TQQQBanner chart's image
BULZ vs TECL vs TQQQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? MicroSectors Solactive FANG Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) vs. Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) vs. ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ)

Key Takeaways

  • BULZ, TECL, and TQQQ are all 3x daily leveraged products targeting technology and growth themes but differ in underlying indexes, diversification, and structure.
  • TQQQ offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.82% and broadest exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index with approximately 100 holdings.
  • TECL provides the most concentrated pure-play technology exposure through the Technology Select Sector Index, with nearly 100% allocation to the sector.
  • BULZ delivers thematic exposure to the Solactive FANG Innovation Index via an ETN structure with roughly 15 holdings and carries issuer credit risk.
  • Structural differences in index construction and leverage reset mechanics drive variations in volatility, concentration risk, and sensitivity to specific market leaders.
  • Cost efficiency and diversification depth position TQQQ favorably for investors seeking balanced leveraged growth exposure compared to the narrower or more thematic alternatives.

Introduction

These three exchange-traded funds attract attention from investors seeking amplified exposure to technology and innovation-driven growth. BULZ, TECL, and TQQQ do not track identical benchmarks; instead, they represent distinct leveraged approaches to overlapping yet differentiated segments of the equity market. BULZ emphasizes a curated FANG-plus-innovation basket, TECL targets the broad technology sector, and TQQQ delivers leveraged access to the Nasdaq-100. This comparison highlights how structural choices in indexes, holdings, costs, and product types influence risk profiles and positioning within the current technology-centric market environment.

MicroSectors Solactive FANG Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs (BULZ) Overview

BULZ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the performance of the Solactive FANG Innovation Index. The index comprises 15 large-capitalization U.S. technology and innovation-focused equities, including eight core components such as Apple, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix, NVIDIA, and Tesla, plus seven additional high-liquidity names from relevant FactSet industries. The product is structured as an exchange-traded note issued by Bank of Montreal, which introduces issuer credit risk distinct from traditional ETF structures. It maintains approximately 15 holdings with equal or near-equal weighting emphasis. Sector allocations typically show technology around 62%, communication services near 25%, and consumer cyclical approximately 13%. The expense ratio stands at 0.95%. The index rebalances monthly and reconstitutes quarterly to maintain exposure to leading tech innovators.

Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) Overview

TECL aims to deliver daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the Technology Select Sector Index. This index tracks U.S. large-cap technology companies and serves as the basis for a market-capitalization-weighted portfolio. The fund employs swaps and other derivatives rather than direct equity ownership, resulting in roughly 70 to 100 effective holdings. Top positions frequently include NVIDIA, Apple, Microsoft, Broadcom, and Micron Technology. Sector exposure concentrates almost entirely in technology at approximately 99%, with minimal allocation elsewhere. The net expense ratio is 0.87%. As an open-end ETF, it resets leverage daily and provides a focused, sector-specific leveraged vehicle without the credit risk associated with ETNs.

ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) Overview

TQQQ seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 300% of the Nasdaq-100 Index. The underlying index includes the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange, weighted by modified market capitalization. The fund utilizes derivatives such as swaps to achieve leverage, resulting in exposure equivalent to approximately 100 holdings. Prominent positions typically feature NVIDIA, Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, and Broadcom. Sector breakdowns generally allocate technology around 54%, communication services near 16%, consumer cyclical about 12%, with smaller weights in consumer defensive and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.82%, the lowest among the three. TQQQ operates as an open-end ETF with daily leverage reset and offers the broadest diversification among the compared products.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector continues to dominate investor focus amid ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, semiconductors, cloud computing, and digital infrastructure. Major holdings across these ETFs benefit from robust earnings growth in these areas, supported by capital expenditures from hyperscalers and enterprise adoption. Macroeconomic drivers include interest rate trajectories, inflation trends, and supply-chain stability, while geopolitical factors influence semiconductor trade and global technology supply. Regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms and antitrust considerations represent ongoing risks. Capital flows into growth-oriented equities have remained resilient in recent market cycles, though sector concentration elevates sensitivity to valuation adjustments and shifts in risk appetite.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, performance differentials among the three have stemmed primarily from variations in index composition and concentration levels. TQQQ’s broader Nasdaq-100 exposure has provided relatively more stable trend consistency compared to the narrower technology-sector focus of TECL or the thematic FANG-innovation tilt of BULZ. TECL’s near-100% technology weighting amplifies sensitivity to semiconductor and software leaders, contributing to higher volatility during sector-specific rotations. BULZ’s smaller number of holdings and equal-weight elements introduce distinct concentration dynamics and potential for outsized moves tied to its specific basket. All three exhibit elevated drawdown potential due to daily 3x leverage reset, with differences arising from underlying index breadth and sector tilts rather than short-term price fluctuations alone.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into leveraged products or sector themes may find the platform useful for refining research.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to TQQQ. Its lowest expense ratio, broadest holdings count of approximately 100, and diversified Nasdaq-100 exposure provide a comparatively balanced risk-adjusted profile relative to TECL’s sector concentration and BULZ’s narrower thematic basket with added ETN credit considerations. Momentum stability and cost efficiency further support this positioning in a technology-driven environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations
Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TQQQ has more net assets: 34.8B vs. TECL (5.96B) and BULZ (3.45B). TECL has a higher annual dividend yield than BULZ and TQQQ: TECL (60.692) vs BULZ (43.787) and TQQQ (31.608). BULZ was incepted earlier than TECL and TQQQ: BULZ (5 years) vs TECL (17 years) and TQQQ (16 years). TQQQ (0.82) has a lower expense ratio than TECL (0.87) and BULZ (0.95).
BULZTECLTQQQ
Gain YTD43.78760.69231.608
Net Assets3.45B5.96B34.8B
Total Expense Ratio0.950.870.82
TurnoverN/A94.0025.00
Yield0.003.400.37
Fund Existence5 years17 years16 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BULZTECLTQQQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BULZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TECL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWSM29.54N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley SMID Cap Divers Val Fd
EVSD50.85-0.02
-0.04%
Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF
IRTR31.57-0.17
-0.54%
iShares LifePath Retirement ETF
DFEV40.84-0.57
-1.38%
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
YMAG11.65-0.24
-2.01%
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fd Of Opt IncETFs

TECL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECL has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TECL jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TECL
1D Price
Change %
TECL100%
-7.02%
NVDA - TECL
73%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
LRCX - TECL
71%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
AVGO - TECL
68%
Closely correlated
-5.12%
AMAT - TECL
68%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
MU - TECL
67%
Closely correlated
-4.70%
More

TQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TQQQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TQQQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TQQQ
1D Price
Change %
TQQQ100%
-6.04%
LRCX - TQQQ
71%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
NVDA - TQQQ
69%
Closely correlated
-3.73%
KLAC - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
AMAT - TQQQ
67%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
ASML - TQQQ
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
More