Advertisement
CB or CCB or EAT
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCCB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and EAT’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
- CB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CCB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- EAT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CCB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s), and EAT’s TA Score reflects 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- CCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- EAT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CB (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.81% price change this week, while CCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.22% , and EAT (@Restaurants) price fluctuated +0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +1.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.65%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.78%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
CB is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.
CCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
EAT is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+1.42% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Regional Banks (+0.54% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
@Restaurants (+0.44% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| CB | CCB | EAT | |
| Capitalization | 139B | 1.1B | 8.38B |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | 818M |
| Gain YTD | 15.690 | -36.844 | 36.176 |
| P/E Ratio | 12.72 | 22.55 | 19.05 |
| Revenue | 61.2B | 409M | 5.73B |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | 57.1M |
| Total Debt | 17.5B | 52.9M | 1.75B |
CB | CCB | EAT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 83 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 55 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 47 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 74 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 77 | 65 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CB's Valuation (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as EAT (77) in the Restaurants industry, and is in the same range as CCB (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CB's stock grew similarly to EAT’s and similarly to CCB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as EAT (33) in the Restaurants industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCB (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CB's stock grew similarly to EAT’s and somewhat faster than CCB’s over the last 12 months.
EAT's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CCB (47) in the Regional Banks industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CB (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that EAT's stock grew somewhat faster than CCB’s and significantly faster than CB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's Price Growth Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as EAT (39) in the Restaurants industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCB (74) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CB's stock grew similarly to EAT’s and somewhat faster than CCB’s over the last 12 months.
CB's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as EAT (65) in the Restaurants industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for CCB (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CB's stock grew similarly to EAT’s and somewhat faster than CCB’s over the last 12 months.
| CB | CCB | EAT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 62% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 49% | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 40% | 7 days ago 64% | 5 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
Advertisement
CB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CB has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CB jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.
CCB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCB has been loosely correlated with BANC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CCB jumps, then BANC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CCB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCB | 100% | +0.25% | ||
| BANC - CCB | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
| HOPE - CCB | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
| FNB - CCB | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| FHB - CCB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| CNOB - CCB | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
EAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EAT has been loosely correlated with CAKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EAT jumps, then CAKE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EAT | 100% | +4.52% | ||
| CAKE - EAT | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.73% | ||
| DRI - EAT | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.97% | ||
| FRSH - EAT | 49% Loosely correlated | +5.36% | ||
| BJRI - EAT | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.98% | ||
| DIN - EAT | 40% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
More | ||||