CIBR
Price
$85.47
Change
+$2.22 (+2.67%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
12.7B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTEC
Price
$277.23
Change
+$8.80 (+3.28%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
19.65B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGV
Price
$90.92
Change
-$0.66 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Net Assets
14.25B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR or FTEC or IGV

Header iconCIBR vs FTEC vs IGV Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs FTEC vs IGVBanner chart's image
CIBR vs FTEC vs IGV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)

Key Takeaways

  • CIBR offers targeted thematic exposure to cybersecurity with 42-46 holdings and higher concentration risk (top 10 at ~59-61%), contrasting FTEC's broad technology sector diversification across 284+ holdings.
  • FTEC provides the lowest expense ratio at 0.08%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors compared to CIBR's 0.58% and IGV's 0.39%.
  • IGV focuses narrowly on software with 111 holdings, emphasizing application (58%) and systems software (38%), while CIBR tilts heavily to technology (94%).
  • In recent months, FTEC has shown stronger trend consistency driven by mega-cap leaders, while CIBR exhibits higher volatility due to niche focus; IGV faces software sector headwinds.
  • All three are passive index trackers, but CIBR's quarterly rebalancing supports dynamic cybersecurity positioning amid rising threats.
  • Risk profiles tier from FTEC's lower beta broad exposure to CIBR's elevated volatility in thematic cybersecurity plays.

Introduction

Investors navigating the technology sector in today's environment compare CIBR, FTEC, and IGV to balance broad exposure, thematic purity, and subsector specialization. CIBR targets cybersecurity via the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, FTEC tracks the broad MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index (covering all IT market caps), and IGV follows the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index for software-focused equities. These ETFs represent tiered approaches: FTEC offers comprehensive IT diversification, CIBR provides high-conviction cybersecurity tilt, and IGV hones in on software growth. Amid AI-driven innovation, escalating cyber threats, and sector rotations, this comparison highlights structural differences in diversification, costs, and sensitivity to macro tech trends.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) seeks investment results tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, a modified equal-weighted benchmark of companies deriving significant revenue from cybersecurity products and services. It holds approximately 42-46 stocks, with top holdings including AVGO (9.6%), PANW (8.8%), CRWD (8.8%), CSCO (8.4%), and FTNT (7.1%), comprising about 59% of assets. Sector allocation skews heavily to information technology (94%), with minor industrials (3%). The expense ratio is 0.58%, and the fund employs quarterly rebalancing with semi-annual reconstitution using liquidity- and market cap-weighted methodology, capping top weights for risk control. As a non-diversified passive ETF, CIBR suits investors seeking thematic cybersecurity exposure.

Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview

The Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) aims to replicate the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, providing broad U.S. IT sector exposure across large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks. It features 284-286 holdings, led by NVDA (18.8%), AAPL (14.3%), MSFT (9.9%), AVGO (4.9%), and MU (2.6%), accounting for ~59% of assets. Nearly 98-99% allocates to information technology, with representative sampling for efficiency. The expense ratio is a low 0.084% (often rounded to 0.08%), reflecting its passive, non-diversified structure. FTEC emphasizes market-cap weighting with 25/50 caps on top constituents, ideal for cost-effective broad tech benchmarking.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, focusing on U.S.- and Canadian-listed software firms plus select interactive entertainment/media companies. It maintains 111 holdings, with top positions ORCL (9.7%), MSFT (8.2%), PLTR (7.3%), CRM (6.3%), and PANW (6.3%), totaling ~59%. Allocation breaks down to application software (58%), systems software (38%), interactive home entertainment (3%), and minor media/services. The 0.39% expense ratio supports its passive, non-diversified design with 8.5% individual caps and semi-annual rebalancing, targeting software industry growth.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology sector, encompassing cybersecurity and software, faces robust macro tailwinds from AI proliferation, cloud migration, and digital transformation, driving capital flows into resilient subsectors. Cybersecurity demand surges amid geopolitical tensions and AI-enabled threats, with global spending projected over $500 billion annually by late decade; regulatory mandates like enhanced data privacy bolster earnings for leaders. Software benefits from enterprise AI integration but contends with valuation pressures from high interest rates and sector rotation. Broader IT thrives on semiconductor and hardware innovation, though risks include supply chain disruptions, M&A consolidation, and policy shifts on AI governance. Recent market cycles highlight capital inflows to cyber and AI infrastructure amid volatility in pure software plays.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, FTEC has outperformed with strong gains from mega-cap hardware leaders like NVDA, exhibiting lower relative volatility (beta ~1.3) and trend stability versus the S&P 500. CIBR shows moderate resilience in cybersecurity, with YTD returns around 2-6% and 1-year ~8-11%, but higher volatility (~22-25% annualized) due to concentration and thematic sensitivity to threat cycles. IGV lags amid software rotation, posting negative YTD (-14%) and 1-year (~-8-12%) amid growth stock drawdowns, with elevated volatility (beta ~1.1-1.12). Differences stem from FTEC's diversification mitigating drawdowns, CIBR's niche momentum in threats, and IGV's exposure to high-valuation software multiples amid macro caution.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors FTEC with 70% probability due to superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), extensive diversification (284+ holdings reducing single-stock risk), stable momentum from broad IT exposure, and favorable risk-adjusted positioning in recent market cycles. While CIBR offers thematic strength in cybersecurity and IGV targets software growth, FTEC's structure aligns best with enduring tech sector tailwinds.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FTEC has more net assets: 19.6B vs. IGV (14.3B) and CIBR (12.7B). FTEC has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR and IGV: FTEC (23.521) vs CIBR (19.830) and IGV (-13.975). CIBR was incepted earlier than FTEC and IGV: CIBR (11 years) vs FTEC (13 years) and IGV (25 years). FTEC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than IGV (0.39) and CIBR (0.58). CIBR and IGV has a higher turnover FTEC (9.00) vs FTEC (9.00).
CIBRFTECIGV
Gain YTD19.83023.521-13.975
Net Assets12.7B19.6B14.3B
Total Expense Ratio0.580.080.39
Turnover21.009.0020.00
Yield0.460.330.00
Fund Existence11 years13 years25 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRFTECIGV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTEC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLJP39.341.08
+2.82%
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
TJAN28.060.10
+0.34%
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027
SHYD22.810.02
+0.09%
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
BCFN20.91N/A
-0.01%
Baron Financials ETF
MSFO11.02-0.17
-1.50%
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF

CIBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBR
1D Price
Change %
CIBR100%
+2.67%
CRWD - CIBR
86%
Closely correlated
+6.76%
PANW - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
+6.20%
OKTA - CIBR
78%
Closely correlated
+2.25%
TENB - CIBR
72%
Closely correlated
+0.26%
RBRK - CIBR
69%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More

IGV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IGV has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IGV jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IGV
1D Price
Change %
IGV100%
-0.72%
CRWD - IGV
76%
Closely correlated
+6.76%
CRM - IGV
76%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
MSFT - IGV
72%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
PANW - IGV
70%
Closely correlated
+6.20%
DSGX - IGV
69%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
More