CNP
Price
$40.68
Change
+$0.01 (+0.02%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
26.8B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ED
Price
$107.98
Change
-$0.97 (-0.89%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
39.93B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PNW
Price
$101.03
Change
+$0.21 (+0.21%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
12.24B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CNP or ED or PNW

CNP vs ED vs PNW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? CenterPoint Energy (CNP) vs. Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CenterPoint Energy (CNP), Consolidated Edison (ED), and Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) are regulated utilities with exposure to electric and gas distribution, offering defensive characteristics in volatile markets.
  • Recent weeks show CNP reporting strong second-quarter results with earnings beats and expanded capital plans, while ED reaffirmed full-year guidance amid stable regulated operations.
  • PNW delivered solid year-to-date performance and positive first-quarter results, with its second-quarter earnings release scheduled imminently.
  • All three stocks exhibit sensitivity to interest rates and regulatory decisions, with varying degrees of load growth from data centers and electrification trends.
  • Relative momentum favors names with recent positive catalysts, though sector-wide valuation remains influenced by broader fixed-income movements.
  • Market sentiment across the group reflects cautious optimism tied to earnings visibility rather than aggressive growth projections.

Introduction

CenterPoint Energy (CNP), Consolidated Edison (ED), and Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) represent established players in the regulated utilities sector. Investors and traders often compare these stocks when seeking defensive exposure with predictable cash flows, dividend yields, and resilience during economic uncertainty. The comparison proves relevant for income-focused portfolios, sector rotation strategies, and those assessing relative value within electric and gas distribution businesses. Recent market activity highlights differences in earnings delivery, capital expenditure plans, and positioning for demand growth from electrification and data centers. This analysis examines observable performance metrics, business models, and sentiment shifts to aid informed evaluation.

CNP Overview and Recent Performance

CenterPoint Energy (CNP) operates as a holding company focused on electric transmission and distribution, as well as natural gas services, primarily in Texas and other regions. In recent market activity, the stock has reflected strength from second-quarter 2026 earnings that surpassed consensus estimates, supported by revenue growth and operational improvements. Analysts noted expanded capital investment plans and reiterated full-year guidance, contributing to positive sentiment. Broader influences include load growth in key service territories and regulatory updates related to grid infrastructure. Performance in recent weeks aligned with sector peers amid stable interest-rate expectations, with the company maintaining emphasis on reliability and infrastructure upgrades.

ED Overview and Recent Performance

Consolidated Edison (ED) provides electric, gas, and steam services in the New York metropolitan area through regulated subsidiaries. Recent market activity featured first-quarter 2026 results that supported reaffirmed adjusted earnings guidance for the full year, driven by consistent performance in core regulated segments. The company declared its quarterly dividend and prepared for second-quarter reporting scheduled shortly. Sentiment has remained steady, influenced by operational reliability metrics and limited exposure to commodity price swings. In recent weeks, the stock tracked broader utilities movements while benefiting from visibility into long-term rate-base growth opportunities.

PNW Overview and Recent Performance

Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) serves as the parent of Arizona Public Service, delivering retail electricity across a large territory in Arizona. Recent market activity included first-quarter 2026 earnings that exceeded expectations, alongside anticipation for second-quarter results due in early August. Year-to-date returns have outpaced some peers, reflecting demand trends and clean-energy mix advantages. Sentiment draws from nuclear and renewable generation exposure, with regulatory proceedings shaping future rate outcomes. In recent weeks, the stock has shown resilience amid sector rotation, supported by customer growth in its service area.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated Trending AI Robots section highlighting select AI trading bots from its extensive library of hundreds of automated strategies. These bots trade thousands of tickers across equities, with only those demonstrating strong alignment to prevailing market conditions featured in the trending roster. Available bots span diverse styles, including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum approaches, with varying timeframes, win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics. Performance metrics often range across backtested and live results, allowing users to filter by ticker compatibility, risk parameters, and historical returns. The platform emphasizes transparency in strategy logic and statistical profiles. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed comparisons.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CenterPoint Energy (CNP), Consolidated Edison (ED), and Pinnacle West Capital (PNW) share regulated utility models centered on rate-base returns but differ in geographic exposure and growth drivers. CNP benefits from Texas-centric electric and gas operations with notable load-growth potential, while ED focuses on dense urban Northeast markets emphasizing reliability. PNW leverages Arizona demand and a diversified generation fleet including nuclear assets. Recent momentum shows CNP with earnings outperformance and capex expansion, ED with steady guidance reaffirmation, and PNW with stronger year-to-date returns. Risk factors include regulatory lag and interest-rate sensitivity for all, though valuation multiples reflect varying growth visibility. Sector exposure remains defensive, with CNP and PNW showing relatively higher sensitivity to regional economic expansion compared to ED’s more mature service territory.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, capital plan updates, and relative momentum within the utilities group, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign higher probabilistic favor to CenterPoint Energy (CNP) in the current environment. Strong second-quarter delivery and infrastructure initiatives provide clearer near-term catalysts relative to peers awaiting upcoming reports. This assessment remains probabilistic and tied to continued trend stability rather than guarantees.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CNP: $40.68ED: $107.98PNW: $101.03)
Brand notoriety: CNP, ED and PNW are all not notable
The three companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CNP: 110%, ED: 93%, PNW: 79%
Market capitalization -- CNP: $26.8B, ED: $39.93B, PNW: $12.24B
$CNP is valued at $26.8B, while ED has a market capitalization of $39.93B, and PNW's market capitalization is $12.24B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electric Utilities ranges from $176.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electric Utilities industry is $30.76B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CNP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileED’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and PNW’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CNP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CNP and ED are a better buy in the long-term than PNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CNP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ED’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and PNW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CNP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PNW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CNP is a better buy in the short-term than PNW, which in turn is a better option than ED.

Price Growth

CNP (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while ED (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.80% , and PNW (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated +0.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

CNP is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

ED is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PNW is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-0.28% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ED($39.9B) has a higher market cap than CNP($26.8B) and PNW($12.2B). CNP has higher P/E ratio than PNW and ED: CNP (24.21) vs PNW (19.39) and ED (17.76). PNW YTD gains are higher at: 17.094 vs. ED (10.490) and CNP (7.273). ED has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.35B vs. CNP (4B) and PNW (2.2B). CNP has more cash in the bank: 453M vs. ED (147M) and PNW (). PNW has less debt than CNP and ED: PNW (15.1B) vs CNP (24.6B) and ED (27.2B). ED has higher revenues than CNP and PNW: ED (17.2B) vs CNP (9.62B) and PNW (5.46B).
CNPEDPNW
Capitalization26.8B39.9B12.2B
EBITDA4B6.35B2.2B
Gain YTD7.27310.49017.094
P/E Ratio24.2117.7619.39
Revenue9.62B17.2B5.46B
Total Cash453M147MN/A
Total Debt24.6B27.2B15.1B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CNP vs ED vs PNW: Fundamental Ratings
CNP
ED
PNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
637264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
141725
SMR RATING
1..100
737675
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
595553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
646051
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
505075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ED's Valuation (60) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as CNP (66) and is in the same range as PNW (69). This means that ED's stock grew similarly to CNP’s and similarly to PNW’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (17) and is in the same range as PNW (25). This means that CNP's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to PNW’s over the last 12 months.

CNP's SMR Rating (73) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as PNW (75) and is in the same range as ED (76). This means that CNP's stock grew similarly to PNW’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (55) and is in the same range as CNP (59). This means that PNW's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.

PNW's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (60) and is in the same range as CNP (64). This means that PNW's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to CNP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CNPEDPNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CNP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGO0.700.03
+4.74%
Largo
COTY2.820.10
+3.68%
COTY
EXEL54.071.87
+3.58%
Exelixis
PFSA0.960.02
+2.53%
Profusa Inc.
FMAO34.920.64
+1.87%
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp

CNP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CNP has been closely correlated with WEC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CNP jumps, then WEC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CNP
1D Price
Change %
CNP100%
+0.02%
WEC - CNP
83%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
AEE - CNP
82%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
DTE - CNP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
LNT - CNP
80%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
DUK - CNP
79%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
More

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
-0.89%
DUK - ED
83%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
WEC - ED
78%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
CMS - ED
77%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
AEE - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
PNW - ED
75%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More

PNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNW has been closely correlated with LNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNW jumps, then LNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNW
1D Price
Change %
PNW100%
+0.21%
LNT - PNW
83%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
DUK - PNW
81%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
EVRG - PNW
80%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
OGE - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
+0.49%
DTE - PNW
79%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
More