CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD), Fortinet (FTNT), and Palo Alto Networks (PANW) dominate the cybersecurity sector, offering endpoint detection, network security, and comprehensive platforms amid escalating threats. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, growth drivers, and valuations in the current market, where AI-enabled attacks have surged 389% in ransomware victims year-over-year. Traders seeking momentum and investors eyeing long-term stability in a $248 billion global cybersecurity spend environment will find these insights on relative positioning valuable.
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) specializes in cloud-native endpoint protection via its Falcon platform, emphasizing AI-powered threat detection and response. In recent market activity, shares traded around $456, with a year-to-date gain of 2.80% despite sector pressures. Fiscal Q4 2026 results highlighted record annual recurring revenue (ARR) of $5.25 billion, up 24% year-over-year, and net new ARR growth of 47%, driven by AI module adoption and partnerships like Anthropic's Claude integration. Sentiment has improved with analyst upgrades, including Mizuho's Outperform rating and $520 price target, amid expanding Falcon Flex financing options. However, lingering SaaS valuation concerns have capped upside in recent weeks.
Fortinet (FTNT) provides integrated network security solutions, including firewalls and secure access service edge (SASE), blending hardware and software for broad enterprise appeal. Shares recently hovered near $86, leading peers with an 8.66% year-to-date return. Recent weeks saw gains ahead of Q1 2026 earnings on May 6, following a Q4 beat with $1.91 billion revenue. The 2026 Global Threat Landscape Report underscored AI-enabled cybercrime surges, reinforcing demand. Analysts maintain a consensus price target of $89, citing profitability (TTM net margin ~27%) and hardware refresh cycles as sentiment drivers, though hiring pushback in cybersecurity noted in surveys tempers broader optimism.
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) delivers a platform-based approach to network security, firewalls, and cloud protection, focusing on next-generation capabilities. Trading around $181, it posted a 1.69% year-to-date increase. Fiscal Q2 2026 revenue rose 15% to $2.6 billion, with Next-Generation Security ARR up 33% to $6.3 billion, fueled by platformization and acquisitions like Portkey for AI agent security. Recent AI partnerships and a Benchmark Buy initiation with $200 target have lifted sentiment, though high valuations and sector AI jitters caused intermittent pullbacks. Upcoming Q3 results on June 2 remain a key focus.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing trading, scalping, and sector-specific plays. These bots deliver impressive stats, including annualized returns from 32% to 127%, win rates of 51-88%, profit factors up to 7.12, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17 in some cases, often outperforming the S&P 500. Selected for current market conditions, they target hot areas like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, and small caps with real-time signals for copy trading. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your strategy across stocks like CRWD, FTNT, and PANW.
CRWD excels in pure SaaS endpoint security with rapid ARR growth but trades at a premium without GAAP profits, contrasting FTNT's hybrid model yielding strong margins and buybacks at lower multiples. PANW offers the broadest platform exposure, including SASE and cloud, but sensitivity to growth deceleration risks higher valuations. Recent momentum favors FTNT on YTD gains, while CRWD and PANW show superior AI catalysts. All face sector risks from macroeconomic tightening, but diversified revenue shields them better than peers.
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward Fortinet (FTNT) based on consistent trend strength, leading YTD performance, attractive valuation relative to growth, and near-term earnings catalysts in a resilient cybersecurity landscape. While CRWD offers superior ARR momentum and PANW platform scale, FTNT's stability positions it favorably probabilistically for the near term.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTNT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s), and PANW’s FA Score reflects 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTNT’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s), and PANW’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +14.62% price change this week, while FTNT (@Computer Communications) price change was +26.63% , and PANW (@Computer Communications) price fluctuated +17.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2026.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Jun 02, 2026.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | FTNT | PANW | |
| Capitalization | 139B | 83.4B | 175B |
| EBITDA | 182M | 2.6B | 2.22B |
| Gain YTD | 16.516 | 43.395 | 17.047 |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 44.14 | 119.78 |
| Revenue | 4.81B | 7.11B | 9.89B |
| Total Cash | 5.23B | 3.3B | 4.54B |
| Total Debt | 820M | 497M | 372M |
CRWD | FTNT | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 29 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 27 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 12 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 12 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 42 | 40 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 39 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANW's Valuation (86) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (90) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that PANW's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (27) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (32) in the null industry. This means that PANW's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (52) in the Computer Communications industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s and significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (39) in the null industry, and is in the same range as PANW (43) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that FTNT's stock grew similarly to CRWD’s and similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (42) in the Computer Communications industry, and is in the same range as CRWD (66) in the null industry. This means that PANW's stock grew similarly to FTNT’s and similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | FTNT | PANW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 73% | N/A | 7 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ADVE | 47.26 | N/A | N/A |
| Matthews Asia Dividend Active ETF | |||
| CAM | 25.01 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | |||
| WEA | 10.55 | -0.04 | -0.34% |
| Western Asset Premier | |||
| DFIC | 37.92 | -0.15 | -0.39% |
| Dimensional International Core Eq 2 ETF | |||
| VUSE | 70.05 | -0.39 | -0.56% |
| Vident U.S. Equity Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CRM - FTNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PANW has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PANW jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANW | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| CRWD - PANW | 71% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| NOW - PANW | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.72% | ||
| ZS - PANW | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| ADSK - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
| EXSPF - PANW | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||