ED
Price
$106.90
Change
+$0.69 (+0.65%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
39.4B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FTS
Price
$56.35
Change
+$0.12 (+0.21%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
28.7B
79 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SO
Price
$93.47
Change
+$0.37 (+0.40%)
Updated
May 12 closing price
Capitalization
105.37B
78 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ED or FTS or SO

Header iconED vs FTS vs SO Comparison
Open Charts ED vs FTS vs SOBanner chart's image
ED vs FTS vs SO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Consolidated Edison (ED) vs. Fortis (FTS) vs. Southern Company (SO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • All three stocks—ED, FTS, and SO—offer dividend yields around 3.1% to 3.3%, appealing to income-focused investors in the defensive utilities sector.
  • SO leads in market capitalization at approximately $109 billion, followed by ED at $40 billion and FTS at $29 billion.
  • Recent one-month performance shows FTS up nearly 1%, SO slightly down 0.4%, and ED down 3.6%, amid broader market activity.
  • SO benefits from strong data center demand growth, while FTS highlights stability with low beta (0.44) and long dividend history.
  • Year-to-date, ED has gained over 11%, outperforming peers in longer-term momentum.

Introduction

Consolidated Edison (ED), Fortis (FTS), and Southern Company (SO) are major players in the regulated electric utilities sector, known for stability and reliable dividends. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business drivers, and relative positioning, helping income-oriented investors and traders evaluate defensive options amid fluctuating energy demands and interest rate sensitivity. With utilities offering resilience in uncertain markets, understanding contrasts in regional exposure, growth catalysts, and momentum aids informed stock selection.

ED Overview and Recent Performance

Consolidated Edison (ED), a New York-based utility serving millions in the metro area, focuses on electric, gas, and steam distribution. In recent market activity, its stock has traded around $110-$111, reflecting a one-month decline of about 3.6% but year-to-date gains exceeding 11%. Sentiment has been influenced by anticipation for upcoming quarterly earnings, expected to show modest EPS growth, alongside a steady dividend payout of $0.887 per share (yield ~3.1%). Broader factors like regional demand stability and interest rate pressures on high-debt utilities have tempered momentum, though its defensive profile supports resilience.

FTS Overview and Recent Performance

Fortis (FTS), a Canadian utility holding company with operations across North America, emphasizes regulated electric and gas assets for consistent cash flows. Trading near $57, the stock has shown one-month gains of nearly 1% and three-month returns of 8.5%, underscoring stability. Key influences include its low beta of 0.44 (a measure of volatility relative to the market) and 52 consecutive years of dividend increases, with a forward yield around 3.2%. Recent weeks reflect positive sentiment from diversified geographic exposure and reliable performance in a rate-sensitive sector.

SO Overview and Recent Performance

Southern Company (SO), a leading U.S. utility serving the Southeast, operates extensive electric generation including nuclear assets. Its stock hovers around $97, with a slight 0.4% dip over recent four weeks but strong quarterly results featuring adjusted EPS of $1.32 beating estimates. Surge in data center usage—up 42%—has boosted outlook, alongside a 3.1% dividend yield. Performance reflects growth from rising electricity demand, offsetting sector headwinds like higher rates.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only those excelling in current market conditions—such as trend-following with 73% success rates or high-return models achieving up to 279% annualized gains—earn a spot here, with averages around 127% returns in select sectors. These bots leverage advanced pattern recognition for stocks like utilities, offering stats on win rates, drawdowns, and Sharpe ratios. Traders can explore and copy these for automated execution. Visit the page to discover bots suited to today’s volatility.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ED, FTS, and SO share regulated utility models prioritizing dividends over growth, but differ in scale and drivers. SO’s $109B market cap dwarfs peers, with higher P/E (~24.7 trailing) reflecting data center catalysts, versus ED’s ~19 P/E and urban focus. FTS offers lowest risk (beta 0.44) and diversification, trading at stable valuations. Recent momentum favors FTS, while SO shows growth potential amid AI-driven demand; ED lags short-term but leads YTD. All face interest rate risks but benefit from sector defensiveness.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward SO for its earnings beat, data center momentum, and relative stability in recent weeks, positioning it favorably amid rising demand trends. FTS trails closely for low volatility, while ED suits pre-earnings plays. Outcomes depend on evolving catalysts like rates and usage growth.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (ED: $106.90FTS: $56.35SO: $93.47)
Brand notoriety: ED and FTS are not notable and SO is notable
The three companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ED: 157%, FTS: 72%, SO: 90%
Market capitalization -- ED: $39.4B, FTS: $28.7B, SO: $105.37B
$ED is valued at $39.4B, while FTS has a market capitalization of $28.7B, and SO's market capitalization is $105.37B. The market cap for tickers in this @Electric Utilities ranges from $197.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the @Electric Utilities industry is $25.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and SO’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ED’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SO is a better buy in the long-term than ED and FTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ED’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SO is a better buy in the short-term than ED, which in turn is a better option than FTS.

Price Growth

ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.90% , and SO (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -2.53% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

SO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-1.15% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SO($105B) has a higher market cap than ED($39.4B) and FTS($28.7B). SO and FTS has higher P/E ratio than ED: SO (23.91) and FTS (22.75) vs ED (18.03). FTS and ED YTD gains are higher at: 8.491 and 8.477 vs. SO (8.032). SO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.5B vs. ED (6.35B) and FTS (5.91B). SO has more cash in the bank: 981M vs. FTS (359M) and ED (147M). ED has less debt than FTS and SO: ED (27.2B) vs FTS (35.4B) and SO (76B). SO has higher revenues than ED and FTS: SO (30.2B) vs ED (17.2B) and FTS (12.2B).
EDFTSSO
Capitalization39.4B28.7B105B
EBITDA6.35B5.91B14.5B
Gain YTD8.4778.4918.032
P/E Ratio18.0322.7523.91
Revenue17.2B12.2B30.2B
Total Cash147M359M981M
Total Debt27.2B35.4B76B
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ED vs FTS vs SO: Fundamental Ratings
ED
FTS
SO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
516261
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
61
Fair valued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
225718
SMR RATING
1..100
757863
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
585255
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
573435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
656550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ED's Valuation (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (61) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SO (63) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.

SO's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (22) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (57) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew similarly to ED’s and somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.

SO's SMR Rating (63) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (75) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (55) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to SO’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

FTS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (35) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to SO’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EDFTSSO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ED
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FTS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDLB16.560.23
+1.42%
ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B
SPMC11.370.09
+0.80%
Sound Point Meridian Capital, Inc.
UJUL40.25N/A
-0.01%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jul
SKOR48.46-0.09
-0.18%
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corp Bd ETF
SPMO144.45-1.62
-1.11%
Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF

ED and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ED
1D Price
Change %
ED100%
+0.65%
DUK - ED
83%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
WEC - ED
78%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
CMS - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
PNW - ED
76%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
SO - ED
73%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
More

FTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ED could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FTS
1D Price
Change %
FTS100%
+0.21%
ED - FTS
73%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
DUK - FTS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
EMA - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
NGG - FTS
68%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
AEE - FTS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More