Consolidated Edison (ED), Fortis (FTS), and Southern Company (SO) are major players in the regulated electric utilities sector, known for stability and reliable dividends. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business drivers, and relative positioning, helping income-oriented investors and traders evaluate defensive options amid fluctuating energy demands and interest rate sensitivity. With utilities offering resilience in uncertain markets, understanding contrasts in regional exposure, growth catalysts, and momentum aids informed stock selection.
Consolidated Edison (ED), a New York-based utility serving millions in the metro area, focuses on electric, gas, and steam distribution. In recent market activity, its stock has traded around $110-$111, reflecting a one-month decline of about 3.6% but year-to-date gains exceeding 11%. Sentiment has been influenced by anticipation for upcoming quarterly earnings, expected to show modest EPS growth, alongside a steady dividend payout of $0.887 per share (yield ~3.1%). Broader factors like regional demand stability and interest rate pressures on high-debt utilities have tempered momentum, though its defensive profile supports resilience.
Fortis (FTS), a Canadian utility holding company with operations across North America, emphasizes regulated electric and gas assets for consistent cash flows. Trading near $57, the stock has shown one-month gains of nearly 1% and three-month returns of 8.5%, underscoring stability. Key influences include its low beta of 0.44 (a measure of volatility relative to the market) and 52 consecutive years of dividend increases, with a forward yield around 3.2%. Recent weeks reflect positive sentiment from diversified geographic exposure and reliable performance in a rate-sensitive sector.
Southern Company (SO), a leading U.S. utility serving the Southeast, operates extensive electric generation including nuclear assets. Its stock hovers around $97, with a slight 0.4% dip over recent four weeks but strong quarterly results featuring adjusted EPS of $1.32 beating estimates. Surge in data center usage—up 42%—has boosted outlook, alongside a 3.1% dividend yield. Performance reflects growth from rising electricity demand, offsetting sector headwinds like higher rates.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform’s top-performing AI trading bots, curated from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and styles. Only those excelling in current market conditions—such as trend-following with 73% success rates or high-return models achieving up to 279% annualized gains—earn a spot here, with averages around 127% returns in select sectors. These bots leverage advanced pattern recognition for stocks like utilities, offering stats on win rates, drawdowns, and Sharpe ratios. Traders can explore and copy these for automated execution. Visit the page to discover bots suited to today’s volatility.
ED, FTS, and SO share regulated utility models prioritizing dividends over growth, but differ in scale and drivers. SO’s $109B market cap dwarfs peers, with higher P/E (~24.7 trailing) reflecting data center catalysts, versus ED’s ~19 P/E and urban focus. FTS offers lowest risk (beta 0.44) and diversification, trading at stable valuations. Recent momentum favors FTS, while SO shows growth potential amid AI-driven demand; ED lags short-term but leads YTD. All face interest rate risks but benefit from sector defensiveness.
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward SO for its earnings beat, data center momentum, and relative stability in recent weeks, positioning it favorably amid rising demand trends. FTS trails closely for low volatility, while ED suits pre-earnings plays. Outcomes depend on evolving catalysts like rates and usage growth.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ED’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and SO’s FA Score reflects 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ED’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SO’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ED (@Electric Utilities) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while FTS (@Electric Utilities) price change was -1.90% , and SO (@Electric Utilities) price fluctuated -2.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.
ED is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
FTS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
SO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.
| ED | FTS | SO | |
| Capitalization | 39.4B | 28.7B | 105B |
| EBITDA | 6.35B | 5.91B | 14.5B |
| Gain YTD | 8.477 | 8.491 | 8.032 |
| P/E Ratio | 18.03 | 22.75 | 23.91 |
| Revenue | 17.2B | 12.2B | 30.2B |
| Total Cash | 147M | 359M | 981M |
| Total Debt | 27.2B | 35.4B | 76B |
ED | FTS | SO | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 62 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 61 Fair valued | 63 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | 57 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 78 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 52 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 34 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ED's Valuation (57) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as FTS (61) in the null industry, and is in the same range as SO (63) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that ED's stock grew similarly to FTS’s and similarly to SO’s over the last 12 months.
SO's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (22) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for FTS (57) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew similarly to ED’s and somewhat faster than FTS’s over the last 12 months.
SO's SMR Rating (63) in the Electric Utilities industry is in the same range as ED (75) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as FTS (78) in the null industry. This means that SO's stock grew similarly to ED’s and similarly to FTS’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (55) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (58) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to SO’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
FTS's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SO (35) in the Electric Utilities industry, and is in the same range as ED (57) in the Electric Utilities industry. This means that FTS's stock grew similarly to SO’s and similarly to ED’s over the last 12 months.
| ED | FTS | SO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | N/A | 1 day ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 37% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 35% | 1 day ago 29% | 1 day ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 39% | 1 day ago 51% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 10 days ago 34% | 6 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 24% | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HDLB | 16.56 | 0.23 | +1.42% |
| ETRACS Mny Py 2xLgd US Hg Dv Lw Vl ETN B | |||
| SPMC | 11.37 | 0.09 | +0.80% |
| Sound Point Meridian Capital, Inc. | |||
| UJUL | 40.25 | N/A | -0.01% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jul | |||
| SKOR | 48.46 | -0.09 | -0.18% |
| FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corp Bd ETF | |||
| SPMO | 144.45 | -1.62 | -1.11% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Momentum ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ED has been closely correlated with DUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ED jumps, then DUK could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTS has been closely correlated with ED. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTS jumps, then ED could also see price increases.