FCOM, VOX, and XLC provide targeted access to the U.S. communication services sector, encompassing interactive media, entertainment, telecom, and advertising firms. These passive ETFs compete within the same thematic space but differ structurally: FCOM and VOX track MSCI Investable Market Indexes covering large-, mid-, and small-caps for broader diversification, while XLC follows the S&P Select Sector Index limited to S&P 500 large-caps for concentrated exposure to sector leaders. Amid AI integration, streaming growth, and digital ad resilience, comparing them reveals trade-offs in diversification, liquidity, and mega-cap tilt—key for investors navigating sector rotation in recent market cycles.
The Fidelity MSCI Communication Services Index ETF (FCOM) is a passively managed fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Communication Services 25/50 Index, which includes U.S. large-, mid-, and small-cap stocks in the sector with issuer caps at 25%/50% to promote diversification. It holds 91 securities, offering broad exposure across market caps (90% large, 8% mid, 2% small/micro). Top holdings include META Platforms (~20%), GOOGL, and GOOG. Sector allocation is nearly 100% communication services, emphasizing interactive media, telecom, and entertainment. The expense ratio is 0.08%, with quarterly rebalancing. AUM stands at ~$1.8 billion, supporting solid liquidity (avg. daily volume ~124K shares). Key features include low costs and inclusive market-cap coverage for comprehensive sector representation.
The Vanguard Communication Services ETF (VOX) passively tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Communication Services 25/50 Index, capturing U.S. equities from large- to small-cap within the sector, subject to 25%/50% issuer limits. Featuring 116 holdings (90% large, 7% mid, 2% small/micro), it provides deep diversification. Top holdings feature META Platforms (20.6%), GOOGL (13.1%), GOOG (8.7%), NFLX (5.7%), and VZ (4.7%). Allocation is fully sector-focused, spanning interactive media (46%), entertainment (19%), and telecom (13%). Expense ratio of 0.09% pairs with ~12% annual turnover and quarterly distributions. AUM ~$5.9 billion enables strong liquidity (~247K avg. daily volume). Distinguishing traits: veteran status (since 2004) and balanced mid/small-cap tilt.
The State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) is a passive ETF replicating the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, comprising ~25 large-cap S&P 500 constituents (96% large-cap). Top holdings: META (13.4%), GOOGL (10.3%), GOOG (8.2%), DIS (4.8%), and TTWO (4.8%). Fully allocated to communication services (interactive media 32%, entertainment 30%, media 23%), it emphasizes blue-chip stability. Expense ratio of 0.08% supports quarterly rebalancing. Boasting ~$25.6 billion AUM and exceptional liquidity (~6.9M avg. daily volume), it's favored for tight spreads. Standout: elite liquidity and mega-cap purity since 2018 inception.
The communication services sector faces a dynamic environment shaped by AI infrastructure demands, streaming competition, and digital advertising resilience. Capital flows favor AI-enabling firms, with hyperscalers investing in compute amid a multiyear super-cycle, boosting related telecom and content providers. Macro drivers include steady global telecom revenue growth (~2.8% CAGR to 2029) from 5G maturation and edge computing, tempered by flat ARPU (average revenue per user). Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and data privacy persists, alongside geopolitical tensions impacting supply chains. Earnings trends highlight ad recovery and subscriber growth, but risks from consumer spending slowdowns loom. Major events like Olympics drive cyclical uplift, while AI monetization evolves across platforms.
In recent months, all three ETFs have shown trend consistency tied to mega-cap leaders like META and Alphabet, with YTD gains around 2-2.5% reflecting sector resilience amid broader volatility. Over recent quarters, broader FCOM and VOX displayed marginally higher volatility (~4% monthly) and drawdowns due to mid/small-cap sensitivity, while XLC's large-cap focus yielded steadier returns and lower beta (~0.98). Concentration risk elevates in XLC (top 10 ~63%), amplifying upside from AI/advertising tailwinds but heightening mega-cap drawdown exposure. Structure drives differences: IMI trackers (FCOM/VOX) benefit from mid-cap momentum in risk-on phases, versus XLC's quality tilt suiting defensive positioning. Macro sensitivity aligns, with all responsive to ad cycles and tech spending.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like communication services.
Tickeron’s AI favors XLC with moderate conviction (~60% probability edge over peers) due to unmatched liquidity, cost parity, and optimal risk-adjusted positioning from large-cap focus amid AI capital flows and mega-cap dominance. While FCOM/VOX excel in diversification, XLC's scale and stability better align with current momentum and lower volatility profile.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FCOM | VOX | XLC | |
| Gain YTD | -3.171 | -3.162 | -4.999 |
| Net Assets | 1.74B | 6.29B | 23.8B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.08 |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 12.00 | 40.00 |
| Yield | 0.91 | 0.96 | 1.21 |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | 8 years |
| FCOM | VOX | XLC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BBMC | 121.91 | 0.61 | +0.50% |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Mid Cap Eq ETF | |||
| ISVL | 51.51 | 0.13 | +0.25% |
| iShares Intl Dev Sm Cp Val Fctr ETF | |||
| PWRD | 110.49 | -0.79 | -0.71% |
| TCW Transform Systems ETF | |||
| QQQA | 76.49 | -1.76 | -2.25% |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF | |||
| OKLL | 5.99 | -0.53 | -8.13% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OKLO ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCOM has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCOM jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCOM | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| META - FCOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| GOOG - FCOM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| GOOGL - FCOM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| ROKU - FCOM | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| SKLZ - FCOM | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VOX has been closely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VOX jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VOX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VOX | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| META - VOX | 74% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| GOOGL - VOX | 68% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| GOOG - VOX | 67% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| ROKU - VOX | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| GTM - VOX | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.81% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLC | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| META - XLC | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| GOOG - XLC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| GOOGL - XLC | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| DIS - XLC | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NWSA - XLC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||