These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide distinct avenues for gaining exposure to precious metals. FGDL delivers direct physical gold ownership, while GOEX focuses on gold exploration and development companies and SILJ targets junior silver mining firms. They do not track similar indexes but instead represent tiered approaches to the same broad theme of precious metals investment, ranging from physical commodity exposure to equity-based thematic strategies. In the current market environment, where macroeconomic factors influence both gold and silver prices, comparing their structural differences helps investors align choices with specific risk tolerances and objectives.
FGDL is a grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion, less expenses. It holds physical gold sourced from LBMA-accredited refiners meeting responsible sourcing standards. The fund maintains one primary holding (gold bullion) with no equity components. Its expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a passively managed product, it requires no rebalancing of securities and provides direct exposure to gold price movements. Distinguishing features include its focus on responsibly sourced gold and grantor trust structure, which differs from mutual fund or open-end ETF formats.
GOEX seeks to track the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return Index, which focuses on companies engaged in gold exploration and development. The fund typically holds approximately 51 equity securities, with allocations concentrated in basic materials. Its expense ratio is 0.65%. The strategy is passive and market-capitalization weighted within the index methodology, with periodic index rebalancing. Key characteristics include exposure to smaller, earlier-stage gold mining firms across regions such as Canada, Australia, and the United States, introducing equity-specific risks alongside gold price sensitivity.
SILJ aims to deliver results that correspond to the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index, which targets companies deriving the majority of revenues from silver mining, exploration, or development. The fund holds approximately 59–68 securities, primarily in basic materials. Its expense ratio is 0.69%. The index employs thematic market-cap weighting and undergoes quarterly rebalancing. Distinguishing aspects include its emphasis on junior silver producers and explorers, resulting in concentrated exposure to smaller-capitalization silver-related equities with potential for higher volatility than broader precious metals vehicles.
The precious metals sector, encompassing gold and silver, responds to macroeconomic drivers such as inflation expectations, interest rate policies, geopolitical tensions, and currency movements. Capital flows into physical gold and mining equities often increase during periods of economic uncertainty. Regulatory considerations around responsible sourcing affect physical gold products, while mining companies face operational risks including permitting delays, labor costs, and environmental compliance. Silver’s dual role as both a monetary metal and industrial input (electronics, solar energy) adds sensitivity to manufacturing and technology sector trends. Gold exploration firms benefit from rising metal prices that improve project economics, yet they remain vulnerable to capital access and development timelines.
In recent market cycles, FGDL has exhibited price movements closely aligned with spot gold, resulting in lower relative volatility compared with equity-based peers. GOEX and SILJ have shown greater sensitivity to both commodity prices and equity market factors, often experiencing amplified drawdowns during risk-off periods due to their holdings in smaller mining companies. Performance differences arise from structural exposure: FGDL avoids company-specific operational risks, while GOEX and SILJ capture potential upside from successful exploration but carry higher concentration and liquidity risks within their respective indices. Over recent months, the equity ETFs have demonstrated more pronounced swings tied to sector sentiment and individual company developments.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to FGDL. Its lowest expense ratio, direct physical backing, and minimal operational complexity provide a more stable and cost-efficient framework for precious metals exposure relative to the higher-cost, equity-concentrated approaches of GOEX and SILJ.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The Aroon Indicator for FGDL entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 81 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 60 of the 81 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 74%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FGDL as a result. In 45 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 59%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FGDL turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 30 of the 47 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 64%.
FGDL moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FGDL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 5 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 45%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGDL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for FGDL's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.
Following a +2.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGDL advanced for three days, in 230 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
FGDL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The 10-day moving average for GOEX crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
GOEX moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GOEX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for GOEX entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The 50-day moving average for GOEX moved above the 200-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +0.44% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GOEX advanced for three days, in 276 of 310 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
GOEX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
SILJ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 36 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The 10-day moving average for SILJ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SILJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
The Aroon Indicator for SILJ entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +3.72% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SILJ advanced for three days, in 282 of 308 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
SILJ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
| FGDL | GOEX | SILJ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GOEX has been closely correlated with DRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GOEX jumps, then DRD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GOEX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOEX | 100% | -2.39% | ||
| DRD - GOEX | 83% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| EMR - GOEX | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| OSK - GOEX | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| SSRM - GOEX | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.81% | ||
| AUGO - GOEX | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.61% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SILJ has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SILJ jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SILJ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SILJ | 100% | -2.11% | ||
| PAAS - SILJ | 94% Closely correlated | -2.24% | ||
| WPM - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -2.14% | ||
| CDE - SILJ | 92% Closely correlated | -3.10% | ||
| SKE - SILJ | 90% Closely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| OR - SILJ | 88% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
More | ||||