Advertisement
FTEC or IETC or IYW
Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) vs. iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) vs. iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW)
Key Takeaways
- FTEC offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.08% among the three, tracking a broad MSCI index with approximately 295 holdings for greater diversification within the information technology sector.
- IETC employs an active strategy focused on U.S. technology companies with resilient domestic value chains, resulting in fewer holdings (around 87) and a higher expense ratio of 0.18%.
- IYW provides passive exposure to a Russell index of U.S. technology equities, with 148 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.38%, emphasizing larger-cap names with concentration caps.
- Structural differences include FTEC's passive index replication versus IETC's active management and IYW's capped index approach, influencing concentration risk and sector allocation depth.
- All three ETFs target U.S. technology exposure but vary in diversification breadth, cost efficiency, and sensitivity to large-cap technology leaders such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
- Investors seeking cost efficiency and broad holdings may favor FTEC, while those prioritizing active U.S.-centric selection may consider IETC.
Introduction
These three exchange-traded funds provide targeted exposure to the U.S. technology sector and serve as relevant comparison points for investors evaluating structural and strategic variations within the same thematic space. FTEC and IYW follow passive index strategies with differing benchmarks and holding counts, while IETC uses an active approach emphasizing domestic technology capabilities. The comparison highlights differences in index methodology, expense ratios, diversification, and positioning amid evolving technology sector dynamics.
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) Overview
FTEC seeks to track the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, investing at least 80% of assets in index securities classified under the information technology sector per Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). The fund holds approximately 295 securities and maintains a low expense ratio of 0.08%. Top holdings typically include major technology firms such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, with sector allocation concentrated in technology. As a passively managed, non-diversified fund, it replicates the index with low turnover and offers broad representation of U.S. information technology equities.
iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) Overview
IETC is an actively managed fund seeking long-term growth through exposure to U.S. technology companies with resilient value chains and domestic capabilities. It classifies holdings using a proprietary evolved sector system and typically maintains around 87 holdings with an expense ratio of 0.18%. Top positions often feature NVDA, AVGO, and AMD, with allocations across software, semiconductors, and tech hardware. The fund emphasizes U.S.-based production and revenues, distinguishing it through active selection rather than strict index replication.
iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview
IYW tracks the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, investing at least 80% of assets in the component securities of this benchmark. The fund holds approximately 148 equities and carries an expense ratio of 0.38%. Top holdings generally include NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, with sector weights led by semiconductors, software, and tech hardware. The index applies concentration caps, and the fund operates as a passively managed, non-diversified vehicle providing broad U.S. technology sector access.
Industry and Thematic Landscape
The U.S. technology sector continues to experience capital flows driven by advancements in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and software services. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate environments, supply chain resilience, and regulatory scrutiny on large technology platforms influence performance across related ETFs. Earnings trends among major holdings remain sensitive to global demand for computing hardware and digital infrastructure, while geopolitical tensions can affect semiconductor supply chains. Sector risks include valuation compression in high-growth names and shifts in capital expenditure by technology consumers.
Performance and Positioning Comparison
In recent market cycles, structural differences have contributed to variations in relative volatility and drawdown profiles among the ETFs. FTEC's broader holdings may provide more stable trend consistency compared to more concentrated peers during periods of large-cap rotation. IETC's active focus on domestic capabilities can lead to differentiated sensitivity to U.S.-specific policy and supply chain developments. IYW's capped index approach moderates single-name concentration risk relative to uncapped benchmarks. Performance divergences often stem from variations in holding counts, expense structures, and exposure to evolving technology sub-sectors.
AI Screener
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable structural strength, diversification profile, cost efficiency, momentum stability, and risk-adjusted positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probability of favor to FTEC due to its lowest expense ratio and broadest holdings within the technology sector.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
FTEC in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026
FTEC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 15, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 35 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FTEC as a result. In 69 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FTEC turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 51 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 44 of the 51 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 86%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FTEC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FTEC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.19% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FTEC advanced for three days, in 341 of 389 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 88%.
FTEC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 299 of 329 cases where FTEC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
IETC in downward trend: 10-day moving average broke below 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026
The 10-day moving average for IETC crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IETC as a result. In 67 of 82 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IETC turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 76%.
IETC moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IETC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IETC's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 20 of 24 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.61% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IETC advanced for three days, in 307 of 357 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
IETC may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 279 of 308 cases where IETC Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
IYW in downward trend: price dove below 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026
IYW moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 29 of 33 similar past instances, the stock price decreased further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on IYW as a result. In 73 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for IYW turned negative on October 12, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 86%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IYW declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where IYW's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 23 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IYW advanced for three days, in 326 of 374 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 87%.
IYW may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 294 of 320 cases where IYW Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
| FTEC | IETC | IYW | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 18 days ago 86% | 18 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
IETC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IETC has been closely correlated with ORCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IETC jumps, then ORCL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IETC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IETC | 100% | -4.09% | ||
| ORCL - IETC | 68% Closely correlated | -2.78% | ||
| ANET - IETC | 64% Loosely correlated | -7.19% | ||
| VSH - IETC | 58% Loosely correlated | -9.54% | ||
| AMRC - IETC | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.83% | ||
| HPE - IETC | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
More | ||||
IYW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IYW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IYW | 100% | -3.15% | ||
| ONTO - IYW | 67% Closely correlated | -10.57% | ||
| MKSI - IYW | 65% Loosely correlated | -9.25% | ||
| NXPI - IYW | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| VRT - IYW | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.81% | ||
| COHR - IYW | 61% Loosely correlated | -12.51% | ||
More | ||||