GDX
Price
$80.20
Change
-$1.49 (-1.82%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
26.57B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GDXJ
Price
$99.35
Change
-$1.85 (-1.83%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
8.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SLVP
Price
$30.28
Change
-$0.86 (-2.76%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Net Assets
839.62M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GDX or GDXJ or SLVP

GDX vs GDXJ vs SLVP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 21, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) vs. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) vs. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP)

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) provides broad exposure to established large-cap gold mining companies through a market-capitalization-weighted index with approximately 60 holdings and a net expense ratio of 0.51%.
  • VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) targets smaller-capitalization gold and silver miners via a distinct index, offering greater diversification with roughly 160 holdings at a net expense ratio of 0.52%.
  • iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) focuses on silver and related metals miners, featuring a more concentrated portfolio of about 36 holdings and the lowest net expense ratio at 0.39%.
  • All three ETFs employ passive indexing strategies within the basic materials sector but differ in market-cap focus, primary metal emphasis, and concentration levels, resulting in varied risk and liquidity profiles.
  • GDX offers the highest liquidity and largest assets under management, while GDXJ emphasizes earlier-stage miners and SLVP delivers the most cost-efficient structure with silver-centric thematic tilt.
  • Structural differences in holdings count, expense ratios, and thematic exposure influence relative positioning for investors seeking gold versus silver mining equities.

Introduction

These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) compete within the precious metals mining sector, delivering equity exposure to companies involved in gold and silver extraction rather than physical commodities or futures contracts. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) both emphasize gold mining but differ in company size and index methodology, while iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) introduces a silver-focused thematic approach. Together they represent tiered risk exposures—large-cap stability, junior miner growth potential, and silver-specific concentration—allowing investors to compare strategic variations within the same broad industry theme.

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Overview

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) seeks to replicate the performance of the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index before fees and expenses. The index includes companies that derive at least 50% of revenues from gold mining and related activities. The fund holds approximately 60 securities, with top holdings typically including major producers such as Newmont, Agnico Eagle Mines, and Barrick Gold. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on basic materials. It maintains a net expense ratio of 0.51% and follows a passive, market-capitalization-weighted methodology with quarterly rebalancing. The structure provides broad global exposure to established gold miners and benefits from high trading volume on NYSE Arca.

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) Overview

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, which focuses on small-capitalization companies primarily engaged in gold and silver mining. The portfolio contains roughly 160 holdings, emphasizing earlier-stage or junior miners with greater growth potential and higher volatility than larger peers. Top positions often include companies such as Alamos Gold, Coeur Mining, and Pan American Silver. Allocation remains concentrated in basic materials. The net expense ratio stands at 0.52%, and the fund uses passive indexing with market-capitalization weighting and periodic rebalancing. It offers enhanced diversification within the junior segment compared with large-cap alternatives.

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) Overview

iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) aims to track the MSCI ACWI Select Silver Miners IMI Index, which selects global companies primarily involved in silver mining along with related metals. The fund maintains a concentrated portfolio of approximately 36 holdings, with significant positions in names such as Hecla Mining, Industrias Peñoles, and First Majestic Silver. Sector exposure is overwhelmingly basic materials. It carries the lowest net expense ratio among the three at 0.39% and employs a passive, investable-market-index methodology. The structure delivers targeted silver thematic exposure with fewer holdings than the VanEck gold-focused ETFs.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The precious metals mining sector responds to macroeconomic drivers including gold and silver price movements, inflation expectations, central bank policies, and geopolitical tensions that influence safe-haven demand. Capital flows into mining equities often accelerate during periods of currency debasement or economic uncertainty, while regulatory changes in key producing regions such as Canada, Australia, Mexico, and South Africa can affect operational costs and permitting. Earnings trends among major holdings depend on metal prices, production volumes, and cost management. Sector risks encompass commodity price volatility, environmental regulations, labor issues, and currency fluctuations in emerging markets. These external factors shape the broader environment for all three ETFs regardless of individual index construction.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, the three ETFs have exhibited distinct behavior driven by differences in market-cap exposure and metal focus. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has generally demonstrated more stable trend consistency due to its large-cap holdings, though it remains sensitive to broader gold price swings. VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has shown higher relative volatility and larger drawdowns in downturns because of its emphasis on smaller companies with greater operational leverage. iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) has displayed amplified sensitivity to silver price dynamics and concentration risk, resulting in periods of outperformance or underperformance versus the gold-centric peers. Performance divergences arise primarily from structural variations in holdings count, company size, and thematic tilt rather than short-term price fluctuations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural strength, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF (SLVP) due to its lowest expense ratio, competitive diversification within a focused theme, and cost-efficient positioning. VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) follows closely for its superior liquidity and broad large-cap stability, while VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) ranks third given its higher expense ratio and elevated volatility profile despite greater holdings depth. This assessment rests on durable characteristics including cost efficiency, risk-adjusted exposure, and thematic alignment rather than transient market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GDX with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

GDX's Indicator enters downward trend

The Aroon Indicator for GDX entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor identified a pattern where the AroonDown red line was above 70 while the AroonUp green line was below 30 for three straight days. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. A.I.dvisor looked at 148 similar instances where the Aroon Indicator formed such a pattern. In 131 of the 148 cases the stock moved lower. This puts the odds of a downward move at 89%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDX as a result. In 69 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for GDX turned negative on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 43 of the 49 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 88%.

GDX moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

The 10-day moving average for GDX crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 10 of 12 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 83%.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDX declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator is in the oversold zone. Keep an eye out for a move up in the foreseeable future.

The 50-day moving average for GDX moved above the 200-day moving average on October 01, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +5.17% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDX advanced for three days, in 292 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

GDX may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for GDXJ with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

GDXJ in downward trend: 10-day moving average crossed below 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026

The 10-day moving average for GDXJ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 13 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on September 23, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on GDXJ as a result. In 68 of 78 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

GDXJ moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where GDXJ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 86%.

The Aroon Indicator for GDXJ entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator entered the oversold zone -- be on the watch for GDXJ's price rising or consolidating in the future. That's also the time to consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The 50-day moving average for GDXJ moved above the 200-day moving average on October 08, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +4.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where GDXJ advanced for three days, in 268 of 296 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

GDXJ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for SLVP with price predictions
Oct 23, 2026

SLVP in downward trend: 10-day moving average broke below 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026

The 10-day moving average for SLVP crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bearish Trend Analysis

SLVP moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SLVP declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.

The Aroon Indicator for SLVP entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Bullish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.

The 50-day moving average for SLVP moved above the 200-day moving average on September 30, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.

Following a +4.76% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SLVP advanced for three days, in 287 of 310 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.

SLVP may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GDXGDXJSLVP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
GDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GDXJ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SLVP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDAQ25.64-0.03
-0.12%
TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (TDAQ)
UITB45.25-0.10
-0.21%
VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB)
IHY20.64-0.07
-0.35%
VanEck International High Yield Bond ETF (IHY)
QQXT99.27-0.88
-0.88%
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Ex-Technology Sector Index Fund (QQXT)
USAX2.82-0.19
-6.31%
Tradr 2X Long USAR Daily ETF (USAX)

GDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GDX has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GDX jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GDX
1D Price
Change %
GDX100%
-1.82%
WPM - GDX
96%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
AEM - GDX
95%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
KGC - GDX
94%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
NEM - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-4.59%
IAG - GDX
93%
Closely correlated
-0.97%
More

SLVP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLVP has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLVP jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVP
1D Price
Change %
SLVP100%
-2.76%
PAAS - SLVP
93%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
WPM - SLVP
93%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
AEM - SLVP
91%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
CDE - SLVP
90%
Closely correlated
-3.10%
SKE - SLVP
90%
Closely correlated
-2.51%
More