GOLD
Price
$43.51
Change
+$1.49 (+3.55%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
18 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NEM
Price
$112.98
Change
+$7.55 (+7.16%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
119.05B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WPM
Price
$134.20
Change
+$8.90 (+7.10%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
60.7B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOLD or NEM or WPM

GOLD vs NEM vs WPM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Barrick Gold (GOLD) vs. Newmont (NEM) vs. Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Barrick Gold (GOLD), Newmont (NEM), and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) are major players in the gold sector, with GOLD and NEM as primary producers and WPM as a precious metals streaming company.
  • Recent market activity shows all three stocks influenced by elevated gold prices, with strong Q1 2026 earnings reported across the sector driven by higher realized prices.
  • WPM offers exposure through streaming agreements, providing potentially more stable margins compared to the operational risks faced by producers GOLD and NEM.
  • Upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings releases in early August position the stocks for potential volatility based on production updates and cost guidance.
  • Relative performance reflects broader gold market sentiment, with producers sensitive to all-in sustaining costs (AISC) and reserve replacement, while WPM benefits from lower direct operational exposure.
  • Valuation metrics such as price-to-earnings ratios vary, with streaming models often commanding premiums for predictability in cash flow.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to gold often compare major producers and streaming companies to assess relative value, risk profiles, and growth potential. Barrick Gold (GOLD), Newmont (NEM), and Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) represent distinct approaches within the precious metals space: two large-scale miners with global operations and one focused on streaming and royalty agreements. This comparison appeals to those evaluating sector positioning amid fluctuating commodity prices, operational execution, and macroeconomic factors influencing gold demand. The analysis highlights recent performance drivers and structural differences relevant for portfolio allocation decisions.

GOLD Overview and Recent Performance

Barrick Gold (GOLD) operates as a leading gold producer with a portfolio of Tier One assets across multiple continents, supplemented by copper output. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in line with broader gold sector movements, supported by elevated spot prices that boosted Q1 2026 results, including strong earnings growth year-over-year. Production beat guidance in the first quarter, aided by strong performances at key sites. Upcoming Q2 2026 earnings on August 10 may provide updated guidance on costs and output, influencing sentiment. Market activity reflects ongoing focus on operational discipline and free cash flow generation amid high gold prices.

NEM Overview and Recent Performance

Newmont (NEM) is the world’s largest gold mining company by production and reserves, with diversified operations primarily in North America and Australia. Recent market activity for NEM has mirrored gold price trends, with Q1 2026 results reflecting benefits from higher realized prices despite typical producer cost pressures. The company maintains a focus on portfolio optimization and reserve replacement. As earnings season approaches, attention centers on production metrics and all-in sustaining costs (AISC), which remain key indicators of operational efficiency in the current environment.

WPM Overview and Recent Performance

Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) functions as a precious metals streaming company, providing upfront capital to miners in exchange for future metal deliveries at predetermined prices. This model has delivered resilient performance in recent weeks, with analysts noting expected strong year-over-year EPS growth ahead of its August 6 earnings release. WPM benefits from high margins and lower direct exposure to mining operational risks compared to producers. Recent trading reflects sensitivity to gold and silver prices but with potentially reduced volatility from its diversified streaming portfolio.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the best and most suitable for current market conditions earn placement in this section, based on factors including strategy effectiveness, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability across timeframes. Bots feature varied trading styles, performance statistics, and ticker sets, allowing users to explore options suited to different market environments. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics and live strategies.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Barrick Gold (GOLD) and Newmont (NEM) operate as integrated producers with direct exposure to mining costs, labor, and geological risks, while Wheaton Precious Metals (WPM) uses a streaming model that emphasizes capital allocation over operations, often resulting in higher margins and more predictable cash flows. Growth drivers differ: producers focus on production growth and cost control, whereas WPM expands through new streaming deals. Recent momentum has been broadly aligned with gold prices, though WPM may exhibit relative stability due to its business structure. Risk factors include regulatory and geopolitical issues for miners versus counterparty and metal price risks for streamers. Sector exposure centers on gold for all three, with varying sensitivity to input costs and valuation multiples influenced by earnings visibility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in earnings delivery, margin stability from the streaming model, and positioning ahead of near-term catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic edge to WPM for relative resilience in the current market environment, while recognizing that GOLD and NEM offer leveraged exposure to production upside. Outcomes remain dependent on gold price movements and execution metrics reported in upcoming quarters.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2026
Stock price -- (GOLD: $43.51NEM: $112.98WPM: $134.20)
Brand notoriety: GOLD, NEM and WPM are all notable
NEM and WPM are part of the Precious Metals industry, and GOLD is in the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLD: 111%, NEM: 129%, WPM: 163%
Market capitalization -- GOLD: $1.26B, NEM: $119.05B, WPM: $60.7B
$NEM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $119.05B. $WPM’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $ $60.7B. $GOLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] has a market capitalization of $ $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $ $134.78B to $ $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $ $928.5B to $ $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $ $13.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $ $13.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNEM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s), and WPM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NEM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WPM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NEM is a better buy in the long-term than WPM, which in turn is a better option than GOLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NEM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and WPM’s TA Score reflects 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • NEM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • WPM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOLD is a better buy in the short-term than WPM, which in turn is a better option than NEM.

Price Growth

GOLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.20% price change this week, while NEM (@Precious Metals) price change was +20.56% , and WPM (@Precious Metals) price fluctuated +23.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -0.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.69%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +21.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

NEM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

WPM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-0.13% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

@Precious Metals (+21.40% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NEM($119B) has a higher market cap than WPM($60.7B) and GOLD($1.26B). WPM has higher P/E ratio than NEM and GOLD: WPM (29.77) vs NEM (14.25) and GOLD (14.17). GOLD YTD gains are higher at: 28.869 vs. WPM (14.545) and NEM (13.644). NEM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 16B vs. WPM (2.4B) and GOLD (204M). NEM has more cash in the bank: 9.01B vs. WPM (2.17B) and GOLD (144M). WPM has less debt than GOLD and NEM: WPM (7.66M) vs GOLD (715M) and NEM (5.6B). NEM has higher revenues than GOLD and WPM: NEM (25.8B) vs GOLD (23B) and WPM (2.75B).
GOLDNEMWPM
Capitalization1.26B119B60.7B
EBITDA204M16B2.4B
Gain YTD28.86913.64414.545
P/E Ratio14.1714.2529.77
Revenue23B25.8B2.75B
Total Cash144M9.01B2.17B
Total Debt715M5.6B7.66M
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLD vs NEM vs WPM: Fundamental Ratings
GOLD
NEM
WPM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
193544
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
514134
SMR RATING
1..100
693844
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
464243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1003697
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
27n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WPM's Valuation (52) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GOLD (70) and is in the same range as NEM (70). This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to GOLD’s and similarly to NEM’s over the last 12 months.

WPM's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as NEM (41) and is in the same range as GOLD (51). This means that WPM's stock grew similarly to NEM’s and similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's SMR Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (44) and is in the same range as GOLD (69). This means that NEM's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as WPM (43) and is in the same range as GOLD (46). This means that NEM's stock grew similarly to WPM’s and similarly to GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

NEM's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WPM (97) and is somewhat better than the same rating for GOLD (100). This means that NEM's stock grew somewhat faster than WPM’s and somewhat faster than GOLD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLDNEMWPM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NEM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WPM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTXSX69.801.10
+1.60%
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp GrInstl
LIDCX12.180.09
+0.74%
Lord Abbett International Value C
VIMAX409.742.82
+0.69%
Vanguard Morn Mid Cap Index Admiral
JEMMX13.680.08
+0.59%
JHancock Emerging Markets Equity I
CBGAX16.410.03
+0.18%
ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Inc C

NEM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NEM has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NEM jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NEM
1D Price
Change %
NEM100%
+7.16%
KGC - NEM
88%
Closely correlated
+7.88%
AEM - NEM
87%
Closely correlated
+6.49%
WPM - NEM
86%
Closely correlated
+7.10%
PAAS - NEM
85%
Closely correlated
+6.60%
CGAU - NEM
85%
Closely correlated
+7.22%
More