GRID, ICLN, and PBD represent distinct approaches within the clean energy and infrastructure investment landscape. GRID emphasizes smart grid infrastructure, while ICLN and PBD focus on broader global clean energy generation and innovation. These exchange-traded funds (ETFs) do not track identical indexes but compete in overlapping thematic spaces driven by decarbonization efforts. Investors comparing them evaluate differences in index methodology, sector concentration, geographic reach, and cost structures to align with specific risk tolerances and thematic convictions in the energy transition theme.
GRID is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the performance of the NASDAQ OMX Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. The index targets companies involved in smart grid technologies, electrical energy infrastructure, and related equipment. The fund holds approximately 130 securities with top positions including ABB Ltd., Eaton Corp. PLC, Johnson Controls International PLC, Schneider Electric SE, and National Grid PLC. Sector allocation is heavily weighted toward industrials (around 65%) and utilities (around 20%), with smaller allocations to technology. GRID carries an expense ratio of 0.56% and employs a modified market-capitalization weighting methodology with periodic rebalancing. Its structure provides focused exposure to grid modernization themes within a globally diversified but infrastructure-centric portfolio.
ICLN is a passively managed ETF designed to track the S&P Global Clean Energy Index (or equivalent benchmark), providing exposure to global companies engaged in clean energy production and related activities. The fund typically holds 106-134 securities, with notable top holdings such as Bloom Energy Corp., First Solar Inc., and Nextracker Inc. Sector weights emphasize utilities and industrials alongside technology components. ICLN maintains an expense ratio of 0.39%, making it the most cost-efficient of the three. It uses a rules-based index methodology with rebalancing to reflect changes in the clean energy universe, offering investors a diversified yet concentrated global clean energy allocation.
PBD is a passively managed ETF that tracks the WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index, focusing on companies involved in clean energy innovation and technologies worldwide. The fund holds approximately 112-124 securities with lower concentration, as the top 10 holdings typically represent under 18% of assets. Holdings span various clean energy subsectors with balanced geographic exposure. PBD features an expense ratio of 0.75%. Its index employs a modified equal-weight approach with quarterly rebalancing to maintain broad representation across innovative clean energy firms, resulting in a more evenly distributed portfolio compared to peers.
The clean energy sector encompasses renewable generation, energy storage, grid infrastructure, and efficiency technologies. Macro drivers include government incentives for decarbonization, rising electricity demand from data centers and electrification, and supply chain developments in solar, wind, and battery technologies. Regulatory shifts toward net-zero targets and infrastructure modernization programs influence capital allocation across the value chain. Geopolitical factors affecting critical minerals and trade policies add volatility, while earnings trends among equipment manufacturers and utilities reflect project pipelines and policy stability. Sector risks include policy uncertainty, interest rate sensitivity for capital-intensive projects, and competition from traditional energy sources during periods of commodity price fluctuations.
In recent market cycles, performance differences have stemmed from exposure variations. GRID’s infrastructure focus has shown relative resilience during periods of elevated interest rates due to stable utility-like cash flows in holdings. ICLN, with greater weighting toward pure-play renewable equipment manufacturers, has exhibited higher sensitivity to technology sector rotations and supply chain developments. PBD’s broader diversification across global innovators has contributed to lower single-name concentration risk but potentially muted upside in concentrated rallies. Volatility profiles reflect these tilts, with GRID often displaying more moderate drawdowns tied to industrial cycles and ICLN showing sharper moves aligned with clean energy sentiment. Relative positioning depends on investor views on grid versus generation exposure within the energy transition.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover opportunities aligned with your strategy.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to ICLN due to its combination of broad clean energy exposure, lowest expense ratio, and balanced holdings profile that supports risk-adjusted positioning in the thematic space. GRID follows closely for investors prioritizing infrastructure specialization and liquidity, while PBD ranks third given its higher cost despite strong diversification. This assessment reflects relative strengths in cost efficiency, thematic alignment, and portfolio construction metrics rather than short-term momentum.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| GRID | ICLN | PBD | |
| Gain YTD | 24.928 | 24.985 | 25.045 |
| Net Assets | 11.5B | 3.02B | 215M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.75 |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 25.00 | 49.00 |
| Yield | 0.78 | 1.14 | 1.63 |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | 19 years |
| GRID | ICLN | PBD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EASG | 38.76 | -0.02 | -0.04% |
| Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Eq ETF | |||
| CPNJ | 27.52 | -0.11 | -0.38% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jun | |||
| KOMP | 70.14 | -0.36 | -0.51% |
| Stt Strt®SPDR®S&PKenshoNwEcosComposETF | |||
| DGRS | 57.21 | -0.68 | -1.17% |
| WisdomTree US SmallCap Qual Div Gr ETF | |||
| KMLI | 7.79 | -0.41 | -5.05% |
| KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRID has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GRID jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRID | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRID | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| ETN - GRID | 79% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NVT - GRID | 69% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| PWR - GRID | 68% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| AEIS - GRID | 67% Closely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| JCI - GRID | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ICLN has been closely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ICLN jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICLN | 100% | -1.63% | ||
| NXT - ICLN | 72% Closely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| BE - ICLN | 70% Closely correlated | +1.46% | ||
| FCEL - ICLN | 68% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| FSLR - ICLN | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| SEDG - ICLN | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.32% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBD has been loosely correlated with BLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PBD jumps, then BLDP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBD | 100% | -0.79% | ||
| BLDP - PBD | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| MP - PBD | 60% Loosely correlated | +6.64% | ||
| CHPT - PBD | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.81% | ||
| EVGO - PBD | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.00% | ||
| ACHR - PBD | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
More | ||||