Advertisement
HUN or MEOH or SQM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntsman Corporation (HUN) vs. Methanex Corporation (MEOH) vs. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile (SQM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Divergent momentum: MEOH has delivered the strongest relative performance, while HUN has lagged and SQM has swung sharply between strength and pullback.
- Different drivers: HUN is tied to industrial chemicals demand, MEOH to methanol pricing and energy inputs, and SQM to lithium and specialty minerals.
- Earnings profiles diverge: HUN is reporting losses, MEOH is cycling toward recovery, and SQM is posting sharply higher lithium-driven profits.
- Valuation sensitivity varies: MEOH trades on a low forward multiple, HUN on a low book value but weak earnings, and SQM on a commodity-cyclical premium.
- Risk sources differ: demand weakness for HUN, methanol-price and integration risk for MEOH, and lithium-price volatility plus Chilean regulatory exposure for SQM.
Introduction
Investors comparing HUN, MEOH, and SQM are weighing three very different plays within the broader chemicals and materials complex. This stock comparison is relevant for traders and investors who want to understand how relative performance, earnings momentum, and market positioning diverge even among companies that share a sector label. Each name is exposed to distinct end markets and commodity cycles, which means the appropriate framing is not "which is best" in absolute terms, but which set of trends and risks best matches an investor's outlook on industrial demand, energy-linked chemicals, and the lithium transition.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
HUN (Huntsman Corporation) manufactures differentiated organic chemicals across polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials, serving construction, automotive, and industrial end markets. In recent weeks the shares have trended lower, trading well below their 50-day and 200-day moving averages and toward the lower end of their 52-week range. Relative performance has been weak, with the stock down meaningfully over the trailing three months despite a modestly positive year-over-year change. Sentiment has been pressured by soft industrial and construction demand and by negative trailing earnings. The company carries a notable dividend yield, but its payout sits alongside a leveraged balance sheet and a negative earnings-per-share (EPS) figure on a trailing twelve-month basis, which has kept analysts cautious; at least one major firm has trimmed its price target while maintaining an underweight-style rating.
MEOH Overview and Recent Performance
MEOH (Methanex Corporation) is the world's largest producer and supplier of methanol, with production sites across North and South America, Asia Pacific, Europe, and New Zealand, plus its own ocean tanker fleet. Relative performance has been the standout of the group, with the stock posting a strong year-over-year advance and solid gains over recent months, supported by the integration of the OCI Global methanol business. That acquisition expanded the North American production base through the Geismar, Beaumont, and Natgasoline assets, and management has reported record production at key sites. Earnings have improved sharply, and the stock trades on a comparatively low forward multiple that reflects both improved profitability and the market's expectation that cyclical earnings have risen. Risks include methanol-price sensitivity, natural-gas feedstock constraints at certain locations, and elevated shipping costs tied to regional conflict.
SQM Overview and Recent Performance
SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile) is a Chilean producer of lithium, iodine and derivatives, and specialty plant nutrients, including potassium-based fertilizers and solar salts. Its lithium is used in electric-vehicle batteries and energy-storage systems, while its iodine is used in applications such as X-ray contrast media. Fundamentals have improved sharply: the company reported a strong first quarter with record lithium sales volumes, higher realized prices, and a large year-over-year increase in net income, and it raised full-year lithium volume guidance. Despite that momentum, the shares have been volatile, giving back some of their earlier gains as renewed lithium oversupply concerns and a firmer U.S. dollar weighed on the sector in recent weeks. The company's low-cost brine operations in Chile's Salar de Atacama support its margins, though its partnership with state-linked CODELCO and evolving Chilean mining policy remain important structural considerations.
Trending AI Robots
For traders who want a systematic, data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates a focused selection of its AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this curated section. Each bot has its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, statistics, and set of tickers it trades, so the "trending" designation is not one-size-fits-all. Reviewing the roster can help traders see which approaches are currently resonating across momentum, value, and volatility regimes. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to evaluate the available options and match a bot's profile to your own market view.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The clearest contrast is in business model and growth drivers. HUN is a diversified specialty-chemicals franchise levered to cyclical construction and industrial activity; MEOH is a methanol pure-play sensitive to natural-gas costs and global shipping; and SQM is a commodity producer riding lithium and iodine demand. On recent momentum, MEOH leads decisively, SQM is mixed (strong year-over-year gains offset by a recent pullback), and HUN trails. Risk factors also diverge: HUN faces demand softness and balance-sheet leverage, MEOH faces methanol-price swings and integration-related debt, and SQM faces lithium-price volatility and Chilean regulatory and partnership exposure. Valuation sensitivity is another differentiator—HUN screens cheap on book value but has negative earnings, MEOH trades on a low forward earnings multiple, and SQM carries a moderate multiple that remains vulnerable to commodity-price revisions.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative strength, and catalyst positioning, Tickeron's AI would most likely favor MEOH at present. The stock combines the group's strongest momentum with improving earnings, a low forward valuation, and a consensus-leaning-positive analyst posture, giving it the most consistent trend profile of the three. SQM offers compelling fundamentals but carries greater volatility from lithium-price swings, while HUN currently shows weaker momentum and earnings support. This is a probabilistic assessment of relative positioning rather than a definitive forecast, and conditions could shift as earnings, commodity prices, and macro sentiment evolve.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
HUN's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for HUN moved out of oversold territory on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 32 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 24 of the 32 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 75%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 46 of 64 cases where HUN's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for HUN just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where HUN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 34 of 52 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Following a +4.13% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where HUN advanced for three days, in 164 of 257 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
HUN may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 19, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on HUN as a result. In 65 of 92 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where HUN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 75%.
The Aroon Indicator for HUN entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 18 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.536) is normal, around the industry mean (1.158). P/E Ratio (-7.838) is within average values for comparable stocks, (3.289). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.080) is also within normal values, averaging (3.769). Dividend Yield (0.043) settles around the average of (0.137) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.269) is also within normal values, averaging (0.578).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 64 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. HUN’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. HUN’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock worse than average.
Momentum Indicator for MEOH turns positive, indicating new upward trend
MEOH saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 97 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 77 of the 97 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 79%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MEOH just turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where MEOH's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 48 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Following a +2.41% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MEOH advanced for three days, in 226 of 318 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for MEOH moved out of overbought territory on October 19, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 35 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 20 of the 35 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 57%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 39 of 61 cases where MEOH's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MEOH declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
MEOH broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 08, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MEOH entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 1 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 10 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MEOH’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 88, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 74 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.904) is normal, around the industry mean (1.158). MEOH's P/E Ratio (71.750) is considerably higher than the industry average of (3.289). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.080) is also within normal values, averaging (3.769). Dividend Yield (0.012) settles around the average of (0.137) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.117) is also within normal values, averaging (0.578).
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
SQM in upward trend: price may ascend as a result of having broken its lower Bollinger Band on October 14, 2026
SQM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 28 of 35 cases where SQM's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.56% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SQM advanced for three days, in 223 of 302 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day moving average for SQM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 18, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 12 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SQM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
The Aroon Indicator for SQM entered a downward trend on October 21, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 44 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (2.645) is normal, around the industry mean (2.360). P/E Ratio (12.027) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-17.218). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.300) is also within normal values, averaging (1.548). Dividend Yield (0.074) settles around the average of (0.040) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.917) is also within normal values, averaging (48.960).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 61 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. SQM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 86 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. SQM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 82, placing this stock worse than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
HUN | MEOH | SQM | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 21 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 86 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 39 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | 1 | 90 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 10 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (18) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SQM (44) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for MEOH (74) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that HUN's stock grew similarly to SQM’s and somewhat faster than MEOH’s over the last 12 months.
MEOH's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (86) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that MEOH's stock grew similarly to SQM’s and somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's SMR Rating (41) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MEOH (86) in the Chemicals Specialty industry, and is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (92) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that SQM's stock grew somewhat faster than MEOH’s and somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
MEOH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as SQM (61) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry, and is in the same range as HUN (64) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that MEOH's stock grew similarly to SQM’s and similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.
MEOH's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as HUN (16) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry, and is significantly better than the same rating for SQM (90) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that MEOH's stock grew similarly to HUN’s and significantly faster than SQM’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | MEOH | SQM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 7 days ago 71% | 17 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MEOH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s), and SQM’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MEOH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SQM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEOH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s), and SQM’s TA Score reflects 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MEOH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SQM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а -0.12% price change this week, while MEOH (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) price change was -0.46% , and SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price fluctuated -5.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -26.61%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.75%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
MEOH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
SQM is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-2.10% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.09% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
Advertisement
MEOH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEOH has been loosely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEOH jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MEOH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEOH | 100% | -0.27% | ||
| DD - MEOH | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| LYB - MEOH | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
| AVNT - MEOH | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| CC - MEOH | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| DOW - MEOH | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||