Advertisement
HUN vs SQM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Huntsman Corporation (HUN) vs. Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Huntsman Corporation (HUN) has delivered stronger year-to-date price appreciation than Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM), with shares rising approximately 45% in 2026 amid improving demand in specialty chemicals.
- SQM has recorded a significantly larger one-year total return exceeding 140%, supported by a rebound in lithium prices that is expected to drive substantial revenue growth.
- HUN reported a wider net loss in its first-quarter 2026 results but maintained stable adjusted EBITDA, with management emphasizing price discipline and stronger-than-expected demand.
- SQM benefits from exposure to the electric vehicle supply chain through lithium production, while HUN operates primarily in polyurethanes and performance products with more cyclical industrial exposure.
- Both stocks trade within broader materials sector dynamics, with HUN showing recent price target increases from analysts and SQM drawing attention for projected 2026 revenue expansion of around 58%.
- Relative positioning favors SQM for growth-oriented investors seeking lithium-related catalysts, while HUN offers appeal through valuation metrics and dividend yield in a recovering industrial environment.
Introduction
Traders and investors frequently compare HUN and SQM to evaluate opportunities across the materials sector, where chemical manufacturing and mineral extraction intersect with broader economic and energy-transition themes. Huntsman Corporation produces specialty chemicals used in construction, automotive, and aerospace applications, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. is a leading producer of lithium and fertilizers. This comparison is particularly relevant for those assessing relative performance, sector exposure, and momentum in the current market environment characterized by fluctuating commodity prices and evolving industrial demand.
HUN Overview and Recent Performance
Huntsman Corporation operates in specialty chemicals, with key segments including polyurethanes, performance products, and advanced materials. In recent market activity, the stock has advanced notably from lower levels earlier in the year, closing near $14.50 amid a 52-week range of $7.30 to $15.90. First-quarter 2026 results showed a net loss attributable to the company of $53 million, wider than the prior-year period, though adjusted EBITDA remained comparable at $73 million. Management highlighted ongoing price increases and stronger demand trends, which have supported sentiment. Analyst actions included a raised price target, reflecting views on improved pricing power and aerospace-related opportunities.
SQM Overview and Recent Performance
Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. focuses on lithium carbonate and hydroxide production, along with potassium fertilizers and industrial chemicals, positioning it as a key supplier to battery and electric vehicle markets. The stock has traded around $80 in recent sessions within a 52-week range of $29.36 to $98.00, delivering substantial gains over the past year. Recent developments center on lithium price recovery, which analysts project will support approximately 58% revenue growth for 2026. The company maintains a dividend policy tied to earnings and has seen institutional interest, with upcoming earnings expected to reflect the improving commodity backdrop.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions—measured by metrics such as win rate, profit factor, and drawdown control—earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span diverse styles, including trend-following, mean-reversion, and momentum approaches, with varying timeframes from intraday to multi-week and performance statistics that can include ranges such as 60-85% win rates or profit factors above 1.5 in optimized setups. All bots differ in their ticker selections, risk parameters, and historical results. Review the platform to explore options suited to individual objectives.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) differ markedly in business models: HUN centers on value-added chemical formulations with exposure to construction and transportation cycles, whereas SQM derives the majority of its activity from lithium extraction tied to energy storage demand. Growth drivers for HUN include pricing initiatives and aerospace recovery, while SQM’s trajectory hinges on lithium market stabilization. Recent momentum shows HUN with larger year-to-date gains, yet SQM maintains superior longer-term returns. Risk factors for HUN encompass raw material cost volatility and industrial slowdowns; for SQM, they include commodity price swings and regulatory considerations in Chile. Market sentiment appears constructive for both, though SQM’s positioning benefits more directly from electric vehicle supply-chain tailwinds, creating a trade-off between HUN’s relative stability in earnings trends and SQM’s higher-beta growth profile.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in recent price action, lithium-related catalysts for revenue expansion, and relative positioning within the materials sector, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to SQM for growth-oriented strategies. HUN presents a more balanced profile with valuation support and demand resilience that could appeal in defensive rotations. Outcomes remain contingent on continued commodity trends and broader economic data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Notable companies
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HUN is a StrongBuy and SQM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HUN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SQM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HUN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HUN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- SQM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
HUN (@Chemicals: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.75% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +3.54% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Major Diversified industry was -4.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.45%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
HUN is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
SQM is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Major Diversified (-4.17% weekly)The major diversified chemicals industry includes companies that produce a wide range of chemicals and industrial gases. The products are often used as raw materials in the manufacturing of various types of goods, including plastics, paints, carpets, and fixtures to name a few. Major companies making diversified chemicals include DuPont de Nemours Inc., Celanese Corporation, Celanese Corporation and Westlake Chemical Corporation.
@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.11% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| HUN | SQM | HUN / SQM | |
| Capitalization | 2.64B | 23B | 11% |
| EBITDA | 124M | 1.62B | 8% |
| Gain YTD | 51.838 | 18.248 | 284% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 28.14 | - |
| Revenue | 5.69B | 5.3B | 107% |
| Total Cash | 369M | 3.87B | 10% |
| Total Debt | 2.49B | 5.11B | 49% |
HUN | SQM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HUN's Valuation (11) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SQM (43) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (100) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
SQM's SMR Rating (59) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (95) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SQM (46) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
HUN's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is in the same range as SQM (14) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.
| HUN | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 14 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 74% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSTZ | 30.30 | 1.33 | +4.59% |
| BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust | |||
| FIDI | 28.42 | 0.52 | +1.87% |
| Fidelity International High Div ETF | |||
| JLQD | 41.22 | 0.22 | +0.52% |
| Janus Henderson Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| XB | 39.18 | 0.17 | +0.44% |
| BondBloxx B Rated USD Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF | |||
| LVLN | 24.64 | N/A | N/A |
| State Street SPDR S&P Leveraged Ln ETF | |||
HUN and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUN has been closely correlated with DOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUN jumps, then DOW could also see price increases.
SQM and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.