IEZ
Price
$27.23
Change
-$0.20 (-0.73%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
553.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OIH
Price
$375.55
Change
-$4.98 (-1.31%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XES
Price
$113.15
Change
-$0.20 (-0.18%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
500.69M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IEZ or OIH or XES

IEZ vs OIH vs XES Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) vs. VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES)

Key Takeaways

  • IEZ, OIH, and XES all target the oil equipment and services subsector but differ structurally: IEZ and OIH use market-cap weighting for larger firms, while XES employs equal weighting for broader mid- and small-cap exposure.
  • OIH and XES share the lowest expense ratio at 0.35%, compared to IEZ's 0.38%, offering slight cost advantages for long-term holding.
  • IEZ holds around 31 stocks with top holdings like SLB and BKR comprising over 40%; OIH has 25-26 highly concentrated names; XES diversifies across 33-34 holdings with no single stock over 5%.
  • XES provides the deepest diversification, reducing concentration risk, while OIH emphasizes liquidity and scale among top oil service providers.
  • All exhibit high volatility tied to oil prices, but XES shows elevated sensitivity due to small-cap tilt, contrasting IEZ and OIH's focus on established leaders.
  • In recent months, equal-weighted XES has edged ahead in upside capture amid mid-cap strength, though with higher drawdown potential.

Introduction

IEZ, OIH, and XES offer targeted exposure to the oil equipment and services subsector, a critical enabler of upstream energy production. These ETFs compete within the same niche but represent varied strategic approaches: market-cap weighted benchmarks for IEZ and OIH prioritize larger, more liquid firms, while XES's equal-weighted methodology captures a broader spectrum including mid- and small-caps. Amid recent geopolitical tensions elevating oil prices and driving capital flows into energy infrastructure, comparing their structures reveals trade-offs in diversification, cost, and sensitivity to sector cycles. Investors weigh these amid macroeconomic shifts like supply disruptions and policy uncertainties influencing drilling activity and equipment demand.

iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) Overview

The iShares U.S. Oil Equipment & Services ETF (IEZ) is a passively managed fund seeking to track the Dow Jones U.S. Select Oil Equipment & Services Index, comprising U.S. equities providing equipment and services to oil fields. It holds approximately 31 stocks, with heavy concentration in top names: SLB (~23%), BKR (~22%), FTI (~5%), HAL (~5%), and NOV. Sector allocation is nearly 100% energy, focused on oil equipment and services. The expense ratio is 0.38%. As a market-cap weighted ETF, IEZ emphasizes larger issuers with greater liquidity, rebalanced periodically to reflect index changes. Its structure suits investors seeking established players in oilfield support.

VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) Overview

The VanEck Oil Services ETF (OIH) passively tracks the MVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index, targeting the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-listed oil services firms involved in equipment, drilling, and upstream support. It maintains 25-26 holdings, with top weights in SLB (~20%), BKR (~12%), HAL (~7%), FTI (~6%), and TS (~5%), accounting for over 70% of assets. Allocation is fully energy-focused. Expense ratio stands at 0.35%, with semi-annual rebalancing. This modified market-cap approach prioritizes liquidity and scale, positioning OIH for investors favoring industry leaders amid volatile oil markets.

State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) Overview

The State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index, an equal-weighted benchmark from the S&P Total Market Index's sub-industry. It holds 33-34 stocks, capping each at ~4.5-5%: examples include Solaris Energy Infrastructure (~4.9%), Kodiak Gas Services (~4.6%), Patterson-UTI (~4.4%), HAL (~4.1%), and SLB (~4.1%). Sector breakdown: ~73% oil & gas equipment/services, 27% drilling. Expense ratio is 0.35%, with quarterly rebalancing. This structure promotes diversification across large-, mid-, and small-caps, reducing single-stock risk while amplifying subsector breadth.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The oil equipment and services sector faces a dynamic environment shaped by geopolitical tensions, including Middle East conflicts disrupting supplies via the Strait of Hormuz and elevating crude prices above $100 per barrel. These shocks have spurred capital flows into energy infrastructure, boosting rig counts and service demand. Macro drivers like U.S. GDP growth projections around 1.4% and rising tariffs (potentially +12.5%) add uncertainty, while regulatory shifts—such as eased Venezuela sanctions—open new supply avenues. Earnings trends for holdings reflect higher realizations, though risks persist from prolonged disruptions, inflation in inputs, and OPEC+ dynamics. Geoeconomic confrontations rank as top global risks, heightening volatility in drilling activity and equipment needs.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, XES has led gains, capturing ~50% YTD returns through equal-weighting's mid-cap boost, outpacing IEZ (~46%) and OIH (~48%). Over recent market cycles, all have rallied with oil surges but shown high volatility (30%+ standard deviation), with XES exhibiting the greatest sensitivity to small-cap swings and drawdowns. IEZ and OIH, anchored by mega-caps like SLB and BKR, display more stable trends and lower relative volatility during consolidations. Concentration in OIH amplifies leader-driven upside but risks sharper pullbacks; XES's breadth aids recovery but heightens beta to rig count changes; IEZ balances the two. Differences stem from weighting: cap-weighted funds favor scale amid macro caution, equal-weighted thrives on broad dispersion.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across sectors like energy equipment. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in oil services.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors OIH with moderate confidence (~60% probability edge) due to its superior liquidity, cost efficiency at 0.35%, and stable momentum from concentrated exposure to proven leaders like SLB. While XES offers better diversification and recent outperformance, its higher volatility suits tactical plays over positioning. IEZ trails slightly on costs but matches cap-weighted stability. This reflects current risk-adjusted strength in large-cap resilience amid geopolitical volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OIH has more net assets: 2B vs. IEZ (553M) and XES (501M). XES has a higher annual dividend yield than OIH and IEZ: XES (39.058) vs OIH (33.627) and IEZ (32.165). IEZ was incepted earlier than OIH and XES: IEZ (20 years) vs OIH (15 years) and XES (20 years). OIH (0.35) and XES (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than IEZ (0.38). XES has a higher turnover IEZ (25.00) and OIH (21.00) vs IEZ (25.00) and OIH (21.00).
IEZOIHXES
Gain YTD32.16533.62739.058
Net Assets553M2B501M
Total Expense Ratio0.380.350.35
Turnover25.0021.0034.00
Yield1.211.161.15
Fund Existence20 years15 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IEZOIHXES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IEZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OIH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GUSH30.910.60
+1.98%
Direxion Dly S&P Oil&Gs Ex&Prd Bl 2X ETF
CGW65.271.12
+1.75%
Invesco S&P Global Water ETF
XIDE30.320.04
+0.13%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & PrmIncETF-Dec
SIOO19.48-0.04
-0.20%
VistaShares Target 15TM S&P 100 Dis ETF
KMLI7.61-0.42
-5.19%
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF

IEZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEZ has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEZ jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IEZ
1D Price
Change %
IEZ100%
+2.58%
SLB - IEZ
87%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
BKR - IEZ
85%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
NOV - IEZ
84%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
HAL - IEZ
82%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
WFRD - IEZ
79%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
More

OIH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OIH has been closely correlated with SLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OIH jumps, then SLB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OIH
1D Price
Change %
OIH100%
+2.49%
SLB - OIH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.74%
NOV - OIH
84%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
HAL - OIH
83%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
BKR - OIH
80%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
HP - OIH
79%
Closely correlated
+3.82%
More

XES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XES has been closely correlated with NOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XES jumps, then NOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XES
1D Price
Change %
XES100%
+3.31%
NOV - XES
81%
Closely correlated
+3.22%
HP - XES
80%
Closely correlated
+3.82%
PTEN - XES
79%
Closely correlated
+2.63%
HAL - XES
78%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
NE - XES
78%
Closely correlated
N/A
More