Advertisement
ILCG or ONEQ or QQQ
Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) vs. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) vs. Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ)
Key Takeaways
- iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) offers the lowest expense ratio at 0.04% and targets large- and mid-cap growth stocks via the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index.
- Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) provides the broadest exposure with over 1,000 holdings tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index, resulting in greater diversification but a higher 0.21% expense ratio.
- Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) delivers concentrated exposure to the 100 largest non-financial Nasdaq-listed companies through the Nasdaq-100 Index, with strong liquidity and a 0.20% expense ratio.
- All three ETFs emphasize growth-oriented technology and innovation sectors, though ILCG includes mid-cap names while ONEQ spans a wider Nasdaq universe and QQQ maintains the tightest large-cap focus.
- Structural differences in index methodology drive variations in concentration risk, sector tilts, and rebalancing frequency across the funds.
- Investors seeking cost efficiency may lean toward ILCG, while those prioritizing broad market representation or high liquidity could consider ONEQ or QQQ respectively.
Introduction
These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide targeted access to U.S. growth equities with varying degrees of breadth and concentration. ILCG, ONEQ, and QQQ compete within the large-growth category yet follow distinct indexes that emphasize different segments of the Nasdaq and broader growth universe. Their structural variations in holdings count, sector weighting, and cost profiles make them relevant for investors evaluating exposure to technology-driven innovation amid evolving market cycles.
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) Overview
ILCG seeks to track the Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index, which selects U.S. large- and mid-cap stocks exhibiting above-average growth characteristics based on earnings, sales, cash flow, and book value metrics. The fund holds approximately 325 to 357 securities and maintains a passive, market-capitalization-weighted approach with quarterly rebalancing. Top holdings typically include NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL). Sector allocation tilts heavily toward technology, often exceeding 50%, followed by consumer cyclical and communication services. Its expense ratio stands at 0.04%, among the lowest in the category, supporting efficient long-term holding.
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) Overview
ONEQ aims to replicate the Nasdaq Composite Index, encompassing more than 3,000 Nasdaq-listed domestic and international companies across all market capitalizations. The fund typically holds over 1,000 securities through a sampling methodology that mirrors the index’s capitalization, industry, and valuation profile. Passive management and physical replication define its structure, with periodic adjustments to track index changes. Prominent holdings feature NVDA, AAPL, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), AMZN, and Alphabet shares. Technology dominates sector exposure, though the broader index incorporates additional consumer, healthcare, and industrial names compared with narrower peers. The expense ratio is 0.21%.
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) Overview
QQQ tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index, which comprises the 100 largest non-financial companies listed on Nasdaq, selected by market capitalization. The fund holds exactly 100 securities under a modified market-capitalization weighting scheme, with quarterly rebalancing and annual reconstitution. Leading positions commonly include NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN, and AVGO. Technology accounts for the majority of assets, supplemented by consumer discretionary, communication services, and healthcare. The expense ratio is 0.20%, and the ETF benefits from exceptional liquidity due to its long history since 1999 and high trading volume.
Industry and Thematic Landscape
The technology and innovation sectors continue to attract significant capital flows driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, cloud computing, semiconductors, and digital services. Macroeconomic factors such as interest rate trajectories, corporate earnings growth among mega-cap names, and regulatory developments in antitrust and data privacy influence all three ETFs. Geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains and global trade add volatility to holdings concentrated in electronics and software. Broader market cycles highlight the sensitivity of growth equities to valuation multiples and investor risk appetite, shaping relative positioning across concentrated versus diversified vehicles.
Performance and Positioning Comparison
In recent market cycles, structural differences have produced varied responses to technology sector momentum. ILCG’s inclusion of mid-cap growth names can moderate concentration risk relative to QQQ while still capturing large-cap leaders. ONEQ’s expansive Nasdaq Composite coverage delivers smoother participation across a wider array of companies, potentially reducing single-stock impact during drawdowns. QQQ’s strict focus on the largest non-financial Nasdaq constituents has historically amplified upside in strong innovation rallies but also heightened sensitivity to mega-cap earnings surprises. Volatility profiles differ accordingly, with broader diversification in ONEQ offering a buffer compared with the tighter holdings of QQQ and ILCG.
AI Screener
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable structural attributes, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference to ILCG for its combination of low expense ratio, balanced large- and mid-cap growth exposure, and efficient tracking of a growth-oriented index. ONEQ offers superior diversification depth suitable for broader representation, while QQQ provides unmatched liquidity and established positioning for investors prioritizing concentrated large-cap innovation exposure. Selection ultimately depends on individual risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
ILCG sees MACD Histogram just turned negative
ILCG saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 13, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 44 of the 49 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ILCG as a result. In 69 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
ILCG moved below its 50-day moving average on October 14, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for ILCG crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 14 of 18 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ILCG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where ILCG's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 26 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.52% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ILCG advanced for three days, in 296 of 354 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 84%.
ILCG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 338 of 378 cases where ILCG Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 89%.
ONEQ in downward trend: 10-day moving average moved below 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026
The 10-day moving average for ONEQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 17 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for ONEQ moved out of overbought territory on October 07, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 45 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 37 of the 45 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 82%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ONEQ as a result. In 70 of 85 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 82%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for ONEQ turned negative on October 13, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 53 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 46 of the 53 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 87%.
ONEQ moved below its 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ONEQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +1.07% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ONEQ advanced for three days, in 302 of 356 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
ONEQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 315 of 358 cases where ONEQ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 88%.
QQQ sees MACD Histogram crosses below signal line
QQQ saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 13, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 46 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 42 of the 46 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 14, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on QQQ as a result. In 73 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 87%.
QQQ moved below its 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for QQQ crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 23, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 16 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where QQQ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 81%.
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Oscillator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where QQQ's RSI Oscillator exited the oversold zone, 24 of 26 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 7 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +1.34% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where QQQ advanced for three days, in 313 of 368 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 85%.
QQQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 316 of 353 cases where QQQ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 90%.
| ILCG | ONEQ | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% | 19 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| NVD | 4.19 | 0.04 | +0.96% |
| GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF (NVD) | |||
| TAPR | 26.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator 2 Yr to April 2027 (TAPR) | |||
| IJT | 161.18 | -0.62 | -0.38% |
| iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) | |||
| MVFG | 34.20 | -0.25 | -0.72% |
| Monarch Volume Factor Global Unconstrained Index ETF (MVFG) | |||
| FAX | 12.73 | -0.22 | -1.70% |
| abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund | |||
ILCG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILCG has been loosely correlated with NVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ILCG jumps, then NVT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILCG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILCG | 100% | -0.37% | ||
| NVT - ILCG | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.62% | ||
| ETN - ILCG | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| FIX - ILCG | 63% Loosely correlated | -9.26% | ||
| VRT - ILCG | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| GLW - ILCG | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||