Advertisement
INTC or MU or PURR
INTC | MU | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | 88 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 28 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MU's Valuation (59) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (98). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
MU's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as INTC (49). This means that MU’s stock grew similarly to INTC’s over the last 12 months.
MU's SMR Rating (17) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for INTC (94). This means that MU’s stock grew significantly faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
MU's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (36). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
MU's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Semiconductors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INTC (76). This means that MU’s stock grew somewhat faster than INTC’s over the last 12 months.
| INTC | MU | PURR | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 73% | 10 days ago 79% | 23 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
INTC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MU’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s), and PURR’s FA Score reflects 0 green FA rating(s).
- INTC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MU’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
- PURR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
INTC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s), and PURR’s TA Score reflects 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- INTC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PURR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
INTC (@Semiconductors) experienced а -12.26% price change this week, while MU (@Semiconductors) price change was -4.27% , and PURR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price fluctuated -6.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -7.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.59%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.23%.
Reported Earning Dates
INTC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
MU is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2026.
PURR is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Semiconductors (-7.09% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.00% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETHT | 16.38 | 0.14 | +0.86% |
| ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) | |||
| PRXV | 35.31 | 0.06 | +0.17% |
| Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| SUSB | 24.43 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares ESG Aware 1-5 Year USD Corporate Bond ETF (SUSB) | |||
| TMYY | 21.05 | -0.48 | -2.21% |
| GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF (TMYY) | |||
| NFLU | 14.86 | -0.53 | -3.44% |
| T-Rex 2X Long NFLX Daily Target ETF (NFLU) | |||
INTC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INTC has been loosely correlated with AMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INTC jumps, then AMD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INTC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INTC | 100% | -2.22% | ||
| AMD - INTC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| RMBS - INTC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
| ASX - INTC | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.59% | ||
| MXL - INTC | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| CEVA - INTC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.