These three exchange-traded funds (ETFs) provide distinct approaches to U.S. equity value investing, making them relevant for comparison in the current market environment. IVE, VLUE, and VYM each target value characteristics within large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks but through different index methodologies and objectives. IVE offers straightforward S&P 500 value exposure, VLUE applies a quantitative value factor overlay, and VYM prioritizes high dividend yields. Together, they represent tiered options for investors seeking value exposure with varying degrees of diversification, cost, and income generation.
The iShares S&P 500 Value ETF (IVE) seeks to track the investment results of the S&P 500 Value Index, which measures the performance of large-cap U.S. equities exhibiting value characteristics based on metrics such as book value, earnings, and sales. The fund holds approximately 440 securities, providing broad diversification across the value segment of the S&P 500. Top holdings typically include major technology and consumer companies such as Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), and others in the top tier. Sector allocations generally feature significant weights in information technology, financials, and health care. IVE maintains a passive structure with quarterly index rebalancing and carries an expense ratio of 0.18%. Its design emphasizes comprehensive large-cap value representation without additional factor tilts.
The iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) seeks to track the MSCI USA Enhanced Value Index, selecting large- and mid-cap U.S. stocks with strong value characteristics using multiple fundamental metrics. The fund typically holds around 150 securities, resulting in a more concentrated portfolio than broad market value indexes. Top holdings often feature technology names such as Micron Technology Inc. (MU) alongside financial and communication companies. Sector exposure tends to overweight information technology while maintaining allocations to financials and health care. VLUE operates as a passive smart beta ETF with quarterly rebalancing and an expense ratio of 0.15%. Its factor-enhanced methodology distinguishes it by targeting undervalued stocks with potential for improved risk-adjusted returns.
The Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) seeks to track the performance of the FTSE High Dividend Yield Index, which consists of U.S. common stocks with above-average dividend yields, excluding real estate investment trusts. The fund holds approximately 600 securities, delivering broad diversification across dividend-paying large-cap companies. Top holdings commonly include established firms in financials, technology, and consumer sectors. Sector allocations typically emphasize financials, information technology, health care, and industrials. VYM uses a passive indexing approach with periodic rebalancing and features the lowest expense ratio among the three at 0.04%. Its structure prioritizes income generation alongside capital appreciation potential through high-yielding stocks.
The broader large-cap value equity landscape continues to be shaped by macroeconomic factors including interest rate expectations, inflation trends, and corporate earnings growth in cyclical sectors. Capital flows have favored value strategies during periods of economic normalization, with financials and energy sectors benefiting from stable rates and commodity dynamics. Regulatory developments around corporate taxation and dividend policies influence high-yield strategies, while technological innovation drives earnings in select value-oriented technology holdings. Geopolitical tensions and supply chain considerations add volatility to industrials and energy exposures across these funds. Overall, the environment supports diversified value approaches amid shifting growth-versus-value sentiment in recent market cycles.
In recent weeks and months, the three ETFs have exhibited performance differences driven by their structural exposures. IVE's broad S&P 500 value representation has provided relatively stable trend consistency with moderate volatility. VLUE's concentrated value factor approach has shown greater sensitivity to technology sector movements, potentially leading to amplified drawdowns or rebounds during sector rotations. VYM's dividend focus has delivered more consistent income-oriented returns with lower sensitivity to growth-driven volatility but possible underperformance in strong momentum markets. Concentration risk appears higher in VLUE due to fewer holdings, while VYM offers deeper diversification. These variations stem from index construction differences, with value factor and dividend tilts creating distinct responses to macroeconomic drivers such as rate changes and earnings trends.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore data-driven insights for ETF and equity selection.
Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign the highest probabilistic favorability to VYM due to its superior cost efficiency at 0.04%, extensive diversification across approximately 600 holdings, and stable dividend-focused positioning that supports risk-adjusted returns in varied market cycles. IVE follows closely for its balanced large-cap coverage, while VLUE’s concentrated factor approach introduces higher concentration risk despite competitive costs. This assessment reflects durable attributes rather than short-term momentum.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| IVE | VLUE | VYM | |
| Gain YTD | 6.823 | 40.973 | 10.904 |
| Net Assets | 47.5B | 13.9B | 96.1B |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.04 |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 30.00 | 11.00 |
| Yield | 1.52 | 1.43 | 2.21 |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | 20 years |
| IVE | VLUE | VYM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 85% | 17 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BINV | 42.23 | -0.57 | -1.32% |
| Brandes International ETF | |||
| COPY | 14.67 | -0.25 | -1.68% |
| Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF | |||
| ITDC | 36.02 | -0.73 | -1.98% |
| iShares LifePath Target Date 2035 ETF | |||
| FDN | 271.79 | -9.09 | -3.24% |
| First Trust Dow Jones Internet ETF | |||
| STBQ | 18.82 | -1.17 | -5.86% |
| Amplify Stablecoin Technology LeadersETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VLUE has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VLUE jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VLUE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VLUE | 100% | -4.16% | ||
| MU - VLUE | 72% Closely correlated | -13.25% | ||
| IVZ - VLUE | 70% Closely correlated | -2.91% | ||
| LNC - VLUE | 70% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| PFG - VLUE | 68% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| MS - VLUE | 68% Closely correlated | -2.90% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VYM has been closely correlated with TFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VYM jumps, then TFC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VYM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VYM | 100% | -1.35% | ||
| TFC - VYM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| HBAN - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| RF - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| APAM - VYM | 75% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| TKR - VYM | 74% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||