IYW
Price
$241.25
Change
-$15.17 (-5.92%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
25.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
VGT
Price
$115.28
Change
-$7.54 (-6.14%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
170.1B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XSD
Price
$571.68
Change
-$72.64 (-11.27%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
3.61B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IYW or VGT or XSD

Header iconIYW vs VGT vs XSD Comparison
Open Charts IYW vs VGT vs XSDBanner chart's image
IYW vs VGT vs XSD Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) vs. Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) vs. State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD)

Key Takeaways

  • IYW and VGT offer broad U.S. technology sector exposure via market-cap weighted indexes, while XSD targets semiconductors with a modified equal-weight approach for reduced concentration risk.
  • VGT provides the lowest expense ratio at 0.09%, enhancing long-term cost efficiency compared to IYW's 0.38% and XSD's 0.35%.
  • VGT boasts superior diversification with 317 holdings versus 139 for IYW and 44 for XSD, balancing mega-cap leaders with mid- and small-caps.
  • XSD's pure semiconductor focus amplifies exposure to high-growth but cyclical chip dynamics, exhibiting higher volatility in recent market cycles.
  • All three ETFs demonstrate strong trend consistency in recent months amid AI-driven rallies, though XSD shows elevated sensitivity to sector-specific drawdowns.
  • Liquidity favors VGT with higher average daily volume, supporting efficient entry and exit for investors.

Introduction

Comparing IYW, VGT, and XSD is timely amid surging demand for AI infrastructure and semiconductors, propelling technology sector capital flows. IYW and VGT track broad U.S. technology indexes, capturing software, hardware, and semiconductors across market caps, with VGT offering wider small-cap inclusion. XSD narrows to the semiconductor sub-industry via an equal-weight strategy, providing tiered risk exposure within the same theme. These passive ETFs differ in diversification depth, cost, and concentration, enabling investors to align with varying appetites for broad tech growth versus specialized chip plays in a macro environment favoring innovation-driven sectors.

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) Overview

The iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) is a passive fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, which measures U.S. large- and mid-cap technology equities with position and sector caps to mitigate concentration. It holds 139 stocks, emphasizing mega-caps like NVDA (16%), AAPL (14%), and GOOGL. Sector allocation is predominantly technology (over 90%), with exposure to semiconductors, software, and hardware. The expense ratio is 0.38%, and it features quarterly distributions. Capping limits single-stock dominance to 22.5% individually and 45% combined for top issuers, promoting balanced replication. AUM exceeds $24 billion, with strong liquidity via 30-day average volume over 1 million shares.

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) Overview

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) passively replicates the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index, spanning large-, mid-, and small-cap U.S. technology firms under GICS classification. With 317 holdings, top weights include NVDA (18.5%), AAPL (15.9%), and MSFT (10.2%). Sub-sector breakdown: semiconductors (34%), technology hardware (19%), systems software (15%), application software (11%). Expense ratio stands at 0.09%, with quarterly dividends. Full replication holds index proportions, shifting to sampling if needed; turnover is low at 7.8%. AUM nears $121 billion, bolstered by high liquidity (average daily volume over 4 million shares) and tight bid-ask spreads.

State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) Overview

State Street SPDR S&P Semiconductor ETF (XSD) tracks the S&P Semiconductor Select Industry Index using a modified equal-weight methodology, derived from the S&P Total Market Index's semiconductors sub-industry. Holding 44 stocks, no single position exceeds 7%, with leaders like MaxLinear (7.3%), INTC (4.3%), and AMD (3.5%). Allocation is 100% semiconductors, blending large-, mid-, and small-caps. Expense ratio is 0.35%, with quarterly distributions. Equal-weighting fosters diversification across design, manufacturing, and equipment firms, rebalanced periodically. AUM around $3 billion supports moderate liquidity, with 30-day median bid-ask spread at 0.13%.

Industry and Thematic Landscape

The technology and semiconductor sectors thrive amid AI infrastructure expansion, with global chip sales projected near $1 trillion in 2026, driven by generative AI, high-bandwidth memory, and hyperscaler capex exceeding $600 billion. Capital flows into data centers and AI processors fuel earnings growth, though memory price inflation and supply constraints pose risks. Regulatory shifts like the CHIPS Act and EU Chips Act promote domestic production amid U.S.-China tensions, while export controls on advanced tools add geopolitical friction. Macro drivers include sustained AI demand offsetting consumer electronics softness, with sector risks from trade barriers, inflation, and inventory cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent months, IYW, VGT, and XSD have posted robust gains, with year-to-date returns around 16-19% reflecting AI tailwinds, though trailing 1-year figures exceed 50-60%. Broad tech ETFs IYW and VGT exhibit similar trend consistency, buoyed by mega-cap leaders, with lower relative volatility (beta ~1.3) versus XSD's heightened sensitivity (beta ~2.5). XSD's equal-weight structure amplifies small- and mid-cap chip exposure, leading to sharper drawdowns in cyclical lulls but outperformance in sector rallies over recent market cycles. Differences stem from VGT's small-cap tilt for resilience, IYW's capping for stability, and XSD's concentration amplifying macro factor responses like capex surges.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in tech and beyond.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI favors VGT, citing its unmatched cost efficiency (0.09% expense ratio), broadest diversification (317 holdings), and superior liquidity for stable momentum capture. While IYW offers refined capping and XSD targeted semiconductor tilt, VGT's risk-adjusted positioning aligns best with enduring tech trends, with ~65% probability of relative outperformance over multi-year horizons based on structural metrics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGT has more net assets: 170B vs. IYW (25.5B) and XSD (3.61B). XSD has a higher annual dividend yield than VGT and IYW: XSD (77.860) vs VGT (22.349) and IYW (20.863). IYW was incepted earlier than VGT and XSD: IYW (26 years) vs VGT (22 years) and XSD (20 years). VGT (0.09) has a lower expense ratio than XSD (0.35) and IYW (0.38). XSD has a higher turnover VGT (8.00) and IYW (7.00) vs VGT (8.00) and IYW (7.00).
IYWVGTXSD
Gain YTD20.86322.34977.860
Net Assets25.5B170B3.61B
Total Expense Ratio0.380.090.35
Turnover7.008.0028.00
Yield0.110.320.13
Fund Existence26 years22 years20 years
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IYWVGTXSD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
VGT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XSD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LGHT8.21-0.01
-0.18%
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LONZ49.11-0.13
-0.26%
PIMCO Sr Ln Actv ETF
INVG25.28-0.14
-0.55%
Gmo Systematic Investment Grade Credit ETF
VSGX79.13-3.38
-4.10%
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
SLVO79.90-5.25
-6.17%
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered CallETN

IYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IYW has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IYW jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IYW
1D Price
Change %
IYW100%
-5.92%
NVDA - IYW
75%
Closely correlated
-6.20%
LRCX - IYW
69%
Closely correlated
-9.85%
AVGO - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-7.92%
MKSI - IYW
65%
Loosely correlated
-8.65%
AMD - IYW
64%
Loosely correlated
-10.86%
More

XSD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSD has been closely correlated with SYNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSD jumps, then SYNA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XSD
1D Price
Change %
XSD100%
-11.27%
SYNA - XSD
79%
Closely correlated
-13.05%
MPWR - XSD
79%
Closely correlated
-10.38%
CEVA - XSD
76%
Closely correlated
-12.11%
ALGM - XSD
74%
Closely correlated
-13.48%
RMBS - XSD
71%
Closely correlated
-14.21%
More